输卵管手术影响不孕女性卵巢储备功能的相关研究

刘晓洁, 郭小妮, 莫小纳, 叶虹

PDF(503 KB)
PDF(503 KB)
重庆医科大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (01) : 130-134. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003633
临床研究

输卵管手术影响不孕女性卵巢储备功能的相关研究

作者信息 +

Effect of tubal surgeries on ovarian reserve function in female infertility

Author information +
History +

摘要

目的 评估不同输卵管处理方式对不孕患者的卵巢储备状况和辅助生殖技术(assisted reproductive technology,ART)结果的影响。 方法 2017年1月至2022年9月在重庆市妇幼保健院生殖医学中心所行ART的11 316例患者,分为未行手术组(n=4 732)、输卵管保守手术组(n=4 578)、输卵管结扎/切除术组(n=2 006),主要观察指标是血清抗苗勒氏管激素(anti-Müllerian hormone,AMH)、基础窦卵泡数(antral-follicle-count,AFC)、基础促卵泡激素(follicle-stimulating hormone,FSH)、获卵数和可移植胚胎数。采用单因素方差分析、卡方检验和广义线性模型(generalize linear model,LSD)进行分析。 结果 与未手术组相比,输卵管保守手术组卵巢储备功能明显下降,AMH(OR=0.736,95%CI=0.668~0.811,P=0.001)、基础FSH(OR=1.171,95%CI=1.064~1.288,P=0.001)、AFC(OR=0.600,95%CI=0.519~0.693,P=0.001)、获卵数(OR=0.569,95%CI=0.439~0.739,P=0.001)、胚胎移植数(OR=0.788,95%CI=0.703~0.883,P<0.001)。输卵管结扎/切除术组与未手术组相比也出现卵巢储备功能明显下降,AMH(OR=0.752,95%CI=0.660~0.856,P<0.001)、基础FSH(OR=1.160,95%CI=1.021~1.318,P<0.05)和AFC计数(OR=0.549,95%CI=0.453~0.665,P<0.001)。但输卵管结扎/切除术组与输卵管保守手术组相比,在AMH、基础FSH、AFC计数、获卵数方面无差异,但MII卵数(OR=1.564,95%CI=1.129~2.167,P=0.007)和胚胎移植数量(OR=1.270,95%CI=1.091~1.479,P=0.002)有正面影响。 结论 对输卵管进行结扎/切除或保守手术,术后女性的卵巢储备功能均下降。但输卵管结扎/切除,与保守手术相比,对卵巢储备功能下降的影响程度无差异。

Abstract

Objective To assess the effect of different tubal treatments on ovarian reserve status and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in infertile patients. Methods This study included 11316 patients receiving ART in Chongqing Institute of Reproduction and Genetics,Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children from January 2017 to September 2022. The patients were divided into three groups: non-surgery group(n=4 732),conservative tubal surgery group(n=4 578),and tubal ligation/salpingectomy group(n=2 006). The primary outcome measures were serum anti-mullerian hormone(AMH),basic antral follicle count(AFC),basic follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH),number of oocytes retrieved,and number of transferable embryos. One-way analysis of variance,chi-square test,and generalized linear model (least significant difference) were used for analysis. Results Compared with the non-surgery group,the patient’ ovarian reserve function decreased significantly in the conservative tubal surgery group,with significant differences in AMH(OR=0.736,95%CI=0.668-0.811,P=0.001),basic FSH(OR=1.171,95%CI=1.064-1.288,P=0.001),AFC(OR=0.600,95%CI=0.519-0.693,P=0.001),number of oocytes retrieved(OR=0.569,95%CI=0.439-0.739,P=0.001),and number of transferable embryos(OR=0.788,95%CI=0.703-0.883,P<0.001);the ovarian reserve function also decreased significantly in the tubal ligation/salpingectomy group,with significant differences in AMH(OR=0.752,95%CI=0.660-0.856,P<0.001),basic FSH (OR=1.160,95%CI=1.021-1.318,P<0.05),and AFC(OR=0.549,95%CI=0.453-0.665,P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in AMH,basic FSH,AFC,and number of oocytes retrieved between the tubal ligation/salpingectomy group and the conservative tubal surgery group,but there were positive effects on the number of metaphase Ⅱ oocytes(OR=1.564,95%CI=1.129-2.167,P=0.007) and number of transferable embryos(OR=1.270,95%CI=1.091-1.479,P=0.002). Conclusion The ovarian reserve function decreases in infertile women after tubal ligation/salpingectomy or conservative tubal surgery. However,tubal ligation/salpingectomy do not result in more serious ovarian reserve impairment compared with conservative tubal surgery.

关键词

辅助生殖助孕 / 卵巢储备功能 / 输卵管手术

Key words

assisted reproductive technology / ovarian reserve function / tubal surgery

中图分类号

R715.5

引用本文

导出引用
刘晓洁 , 郭小妮 , 莫小纳 , . 输卵管手术影响不孕女性卵巢储备功能的相关研究. 重庆医科大学学报. 2025, 50(01): 130-134 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003633
Liu Xiaojie, Guo Xiaoni, Mo Xiaona, et al. Effect of tubal surgeries on ovarian reserve function in female infertility[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2025, 50(01): 130-134 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003633

参考文献

1
Zegers-Hochschild F Adamson GD de Mouzon J,et al. The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization(WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology[J]. Hum Reprod200924(11):2683-2687.
2
张翠玲,姜 玉,庄亚儿,等. 中国女性终身不育水平估计:基于第七次全国人口普查数据的分析[J]. 人口研究202347(3):78-93.
Zhang CL Jiang Y Zhuang YE,et al. An assessment of lifetime childlessness in China based on the 7th population census[J]. Popul Res202347(3):78-93.
3
Lobo RA Gershenson DM Lentz MD Valea FA. Comprehensive Gynecology[M]. Netherlands:7th ed. Elsevier,2017:904.
4
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Electronic address: org ASRM@asrm. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology:a committee opinion[J]. Fertil Steril2021115(5):1143-1150.
5
Kotlyar A Gingold J Shue S,et al. The effect of salpingectomy on ovarian function[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol201724(4):563-578.
6
Rustamov O Krishnan M Roberts SA,et al. Effect of salpingectomy,ovarian cystectomy and unilateral salpingo-oopherectomy on ovarian reserve[J]. Gynecol Surg201613:173-178.
7
Moolhuijsen LME Visser JA. Anti-müllerian hormone and ovarian reserve:update on assessing ovarian function[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2020105(11):3361-3373.
8
Bedenk J Vrtačnik-Bokal E Virant-Klun I. The role of anti-Müllerian hormone(AMH) in ovarian disease and infertility[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet202037(1):89-100.
9
Sezik M Ozkaya O Demir F,et al. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy:effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res200733(6):863-869.
10
Surrey ES Schoolcraft WB. Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinges before in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer:salpingectomy versus proximal tubal occlusion[J]. Fertil Steril200175(3):612-617.
11
Luo JQ Shi Y Liu D,et al. The effect of salpingectomy on the ovarian reserve and ovarian response in ectopic pregnancy:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine201998(47):e17901.
12
Kobayashi M Kitahara Y Hasegawa Y,et al. Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian reserve:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res202248(7):1513-1522.
13
Gupta V Agarwal S Chaudhari P,et al. A study to evaluate the effect of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian reserve and function[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India202373(1):62-68.
14
Wang SZ Gu JH. The effect of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve in patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. J Ovarian Res202114(1):86.
15
王凤笛,陈月璐,张 越,等. 卵巢储备功能减退与肠道及生殖道微生物相关性研究进展[J]. 重庆医科大学学报202449(2):105-108.
Wang FD Chen YL Zhang Y,et al. Research advances in the association of diminished ovarian reserve with gut and genital tract microbiota[J]. J Chongqing Med Univ202449(2):105-108.
16
Tehranian A Zangbar RH Aghajani F,et al. Effects of salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy on ovarian reserve:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Gynecol Surg201714(1):17.
17
Pereira N Pryor KP Voskuilen-Gonzalez A,et al. Ovarian response and inVitro fertilization outcomes after salpingectomy:does salpingectomy indication matter?[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol201724(3):446-454.

评论

PDF(503 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/