
局麻下可弯曲负压鞘联合输尿管软镜治疗≥3 cm肾结石的有效性和安全性研究
常海, 王林峰, 张高杰, 彭越强, 罗生军, 唐伟
局麻下可弯曲负压鞘联合输尿管软镜治疗≥3 cm肾结石的有效性和安全性研究
Efficacy and safety of a tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopy under local anesthesia in treatment of kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm
目的 探讨局部麻醉下可弯曲负压鞘联合输尿管软镜治疗3.0 cm以上大负荷肾结石的有效性和安全性。 方法 回顾性分析2023年1月至2023年12月于重庆医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科局麻下完成的输尿管软镜钬激光碎石治疗的3.0 cm以上肾结石患者的临床资料,并分为可弯鞘组和传统鞘组,收集其一般资料,对比2组在围术期指标、术后并发症、手术效果等相关指标的差异。 结果 共96例患者纳入研究,其中可弯曲鞘组44例,传统鞘组52例,2组患者的年龄、体质指数(body mass index,BMI)、结石负荷等一般资料2组间比较差异无统计学意义,可弯鞘组术后清石率(72.73%)明显高于传统鞘组(46.15%),P<0.05,而并发症发生率,如发热(2.27%)、石街形成(2.27%)明显低于传统鞘组(23.08%/17.31%),P<0.05,单次手术时间可弯鞘组[(126.20±21.45) min]与传统鞘组[(116.71±27.39) min]比较差异无统计学意义。 结论 局麻下可弯曲负压鞘联合输尿管软镜治疗≥3 cm肾结石安全、有效,值得推广和应用。
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of a tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with a flexible ureteroscope under local anesthesia in the treatment of high-burden kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of the patients with kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm who underwent holmium laser lithotripsy by ureteral ureteroscopy under local anesthesia in Department of Urology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,from January to December 2023,and the patients were divided into flexible sheath group and conventional sheath group. General data were collected,and the two groups were compared in terms of perioperative indicators,postoperative complications,and surgical outcomes. Results A total of 96 patients were enrolled in this study,with 44 patients in the flexible sheath group and 52 patients in the conventional sheath group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the general data such as age,body mass index,and stone burden,and compared with the conventional sheath group,the flexible sheath group had a significantly higher postoperative stone clearance rate(72.73% vs. 46.15%,P<0.05),while the complication rates,such as fever(2.27%) and stone street formation(2.27%) were significantly lower than that of the traditional sheath group(23.08%/17.31%),P<0.05,There was no significant difference in the time of single operation between the flexible sheath group and the conventional sheath group(126.20±21.45 min vs. 116.71±27.39 min). Conclusion Tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopy under local anesthesia is safe and effective in the treatment of high-burden kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm and thus holds promise for clinical application.
kidney stone / local anesthesia / tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath / flexible ureteroscopy
R692.4
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
林奕伟,梁 慧,梁利健,等. 头端可弯曲负压输尿管鞘在大负荷肾结石(≥2 cm)输尿管软镜碎石取石术中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志,2023,38(6):433-436.
|
5 |
段传军,杨 瑞,赵红,等. 微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜在治疗2.0~4.0 cm肾结石中疗效与安全性比较[J]. 安徽医学,2024,45(2):203-206.
|
6 |
周文湖,陈道勋,卢东明,等. 经尿道可弯曲负压吸引鞘碎石取石治疗肾及输尿管上段结石的初步疗效[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2023,28(12):1028-1031.
|
7 |
王晨阳. 分期输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗直径3~4 cm肾结石的效果对比[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2023.
|
8 |
|
9 |
张明明,苏晓雨,刘 金. 输尿管镜手术治疗重复肾输尿管畸形合并输尿管结石21例临床分析[J]. 临床医学,2022,42(4):58-60.
|
10 |
黄闻彦. 一次性输尿管软镜及可重复使用输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效对比[D]. 广州:广州医科大学,2022.
|
11 |
林剑峰,叶志彬,涂建平,等. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘与常规鞘联合一次性输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的疗效比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2023,23(9):652-656.
|
12 |
吴小将,田文俊,郑达闻,等. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗直径2~3 cm上尿路结石的临床研究[J]. 中华全科医学,2023,21(9):1516-1519.
|
13 |
胡力仁,范先明,林剑锋,等. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜治疗2~3 cm上尿路结石[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2022,22(9):763-766.
|
14 |
伏 伟. 输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效比较分析[J]. 中华养生保健,2023,41(8):188-190.
|
15 |
伦晓璐,王永传,周海军,等. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗2~4 cm肾结石临床疗效观察[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志,2020,9(4):245-249.
|
16 |
丁 强,谢文华,何 屹. 40~80 Hz钬激光微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜手术治疗肾结石患者的疗效比较[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2024,29(1):65-68.
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
张慧铭,史 晶,徐虹,等. 杜非合剂联合利多卡因局部麻醉在输尿管软镜碎石取石的临床应用[J]. 基层医学论坛,2021,25(26):3743-3744.
|
20 |
王 宁,刘慧倩,唐永玺,等. 局麻输尿管软镜钬激光碎石取石术治疗高危上尿路结石患者疗效观察[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志,2022,37(8):620-625.
|
21 |
亓立成,楚 宁. 《2022 EAU指南:尿石症介入治疗的最佳实践》解读[J]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2022,14(4):31-36.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |