非小细胞肺癌同源重组修复通路基因与临床特征的相关性分析

杨茜, 赵洁, 唐海涛, 廖鑫, 牟康, 李小松, 沈依帆

PDF(936 KB)
PDF(936 KB)
重庆医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (07) : 871-876. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003508
临床研究

非小细胞肺癌同源重组修复通路基因与临床特征的相关性分析

作者信息 +

Correlation of homologous recombination repair genes with clinical features in non-small cell lung cancer

Author information +
History +

摘要

目的 采用基因组不稳定评分(genomic instability score,GIS)描述非小细胞肺癌患者的同源重组修复缺陷(homologous recombination deficiency,HRD)状态,探讨HRD状态及同源重组通路基因(homologous recombination repair,HRR)与临床特征的相关性。 方法 本研究纳入2020年1月至2022年1月在重庆医科大学附属第一医院接受治疗的335例非小细胞肺癌患者,采用二代测序法检测GIS评分及35个HRR基因,根据杂合性缺失(loss of heterozygosity,LOH)、端粒等位基因失衡(telomeric allelic imbalance,TAI)、大片段迁移(large-scale state transition,LST)综合评估GIS评分。GIS评分及HRR基因与临床特征之间的关系通过Mann-Whitney U检验,Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn-Bonferroni检验分析。GIS评分和肿瘤突变负荷(tumor mutation burden,TMB)值的相关性采用Spearman分析。 结果 在335例患者中,男性患者、年龄大、分期晚、有吸烟史、鳞癌均会导致GIS评分更高,GIS评分MdP25,P75 )分别是13(4,26.75),12(3,22.5),21.5(12,30),16(4,27)和24(18,38.25)(Z=-5.083,P<0.001;Z=2.973,P=0.003;Z=8.225,P<0.001;Z=4.655,P<0.001;Z=-7.082,P<0.001)。HRR体系基因突变组样本GIS评分高于野生组,2组GIS评分分别为18.5(5.25,28.75)和6(1,16)(Z=5.012,P<0.001)。共检测到33个HRR相关基因突变,主要集中在ATM、RECQL4、ATR、FANCM、BRCA1、FANCA、BRIP1、NBN、WRN等基因,其中BRCA2、FANCI、FANCA基因突变均会导致GIS评分升高,GIS评分MdP25,P75 )分别是34(25.25,51),31.5(14.5,50)和22(12,44)(Z=-2.805,P=0.005;Z=-2.216,P=0.027;Z=-2.478,P=0.013)。GIS评分和TMB值之间呈正相关(rs =0.504,P<0.001)。 结论 揭示中国非小细胞肺癌患者GIS评分及HRR基因突变特征,提示基于二代测序的GIS评分及HRR基因检测可能成为非小细胞肺癌患者靶向治疗及免疫治疗新的生物标志物。

Abstract

Objective To investigae the status of homologous recombination deficiency(HRD)in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)patients by using genomic instability score(GIS)and the correlation of HRD status and homologous recombination repair(HRR)genes with the clinical features of NSCLC. Methods A total of 335 patients with NSCLC who were treated in The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2020 to January 2022 were enrolled,and next-generation sequencing was used to measure GIS score and 35 HRR genes. GIS score was determined based on loss of heterozygosity,telomeric allelic imbalance,and large-scale state transition. The Mann-Whitney U test,the Kruskal-Wallis test,and the Dunn-Bonferroni test were used to investigate the correlation of GIS score and HRR genes with clinical features. The Spearman analysis was used to investigate the correlation between GIS score and tumor mutation burden(TMB). Results Among the 335 patients,male sex,older age,advanced stage,smoking history,and squamous cell carcinoma all contributed to a higher GIS score,and the Md(P25,P75 )values of GIS scores were 13(4,26.75),12(3,22.5),21.5(12,30),16(4,27),and 24(18,38.25),respectively(Z=-5.083,P<0.001;Z=2.973,P=0.003;Z=8.225,P<0.001;Z=4.655,P<0.001;Z=-7.082,P<0.001). The GIS score of the samples in the HRR somatic mutation group was significantly higher than that in the wild group,with a Md(P25,P75 )value of 18.5(5.25,28.75)and 6(1,16),respectively(Z=5.012,P<0.001). A total of 33 HRR-related gene mutations were found,which were mainly located in the ATM,RECQL4,ATR,FANCM,BRCA1,FANCA,BRIP1,NBN,and WRN genes,and among these genes,mutations in the BRCA2,FANCI,and FANCA genes could lead to the increase in GIS score,with a Md(P25,P75 )value of 34(25.25,51),31.5(14.5,50),and 22(12,44),respectively(Z=-2.805,P=0.005;Z=-2.216,P=0.027;Z=-2.478,P=0.013). GIS score was positively correlated with TMB(rs =0.504,P<0.001). Conclusion This study reveals GIS score and the characteristics of HRR mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients,and these findings suggest that GIS score and HRR gene detection based on next-generation sequencing can become new biomarkers for targeted therapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC patients.

关键词

非小细胞肺癌 / 同源重组修复缺陷 / 基因组不稳定评分 / 同源重组通路

Key words

non-small cell lung cancer / homologous recombination deficiency / genomic instability score / homologous recombination repair

中图分类号

R734.2

引用本文

导出引用
杨茜 , 赵洁 , 唐海涛 , . 非小细胞肺癌同源重组修复通路基因与临床特征的相关性分析. 重庆医科大学学报. 2024, 49(07): 871-876 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003508
Yang Xi, Zhao Jie, Tang Haitao, et al. Correlation of homologous recombination repair genes with clinical features in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2024, 49(07): 871-876 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003508

参考文献

1
Zheng RS Zhang SW Zeng HM,et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China,2016[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent20222(1):1-9.
2
Lord CJ Ashworth A. PARP inhibitors:synthetic lethality in the clinic[J]. Science2017355(6330):1152-1158.
3
Principe DR Narbutis M Koch R,et al. Frequency and prognostic value of mutations associated with the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway in a large pan cancer cohort[J]. Sci Rep202010(1):20223.
4
Diossy M Sztupinszki Z Borcsok J,et al. A subset of lung cancer cases shows robust signs of homologous recombination deficiency associated genomic mutational signatures[J]. NPJ Precis Oncol20215(1):55.
5
Travis WD. The 2015 WHO classification of lung tumors[J]. Pathologe201435(Suppl 2):188.
6
Amin M Edge S Greene F,et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed [M]. New York:Springer,2017.
7
Abkevich V Timms KM Hennessy BT,et al. Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Br J Cancer2012107(10):1776-1782.
8
Birkbak NJ Wang ZC Kim JY,et al. Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents[J]. Cancer Discov20122(4):366-375.
9
Popova T Manié E Rieunier G,et al. Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation[J]. Cancer Res201272(21):5454-5462.
10
Hoppe MM Sundar R Tan DSP,et al. Biomarkers for homologous recombination deficiency in cancer[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst2018110(7):704-713.
11
Miller RE Leary A Scott CL,et al. ESMO recommendations on predictive biomarker testing for homologous recombination deficiency and PARP inhibitor benefit in ovarian cancer[J]. Ann Oncol202031(12):1606-1622.
12
Lord CJ Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy[J]. Nature2012481(7381):287-294.
13
Gelmon KA Tischkowitz M MacKay H,et al. Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer:a phase 2,multicentre,open-label,non-randomised study[J]. Lancet Oncol201112(9):852-861.
14
Locken-Castilla A Pacheco-Pantoja EL Rodríguez-Brito F,et al. Smoking index,lifestyle factors,and genomic instability assessed by single-cell gel electrophoresis:a cross-sectional study in subjects from Yucatan,Mexico[J]. Clin Epigenetics201911(1):150.
15
Helleday T. Pathways for mitotic homologous recombination in mammalian cells[J]. Mutat Res2003532(1/2):103-115.
16
Ryk C Kumar R Thirumaran RK,et al. Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1,APEX1,XRCC3 and NBS1,and the risk for lung cancer in never- and ever-smokers[J]. Lung Cancer200654(3):285-292.
17
Nogueira A Catarino R Coelho A,et al. Influence of DNA repair RAD51 gene variants in overall survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first line chemotherapy[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol201066(3):501-506.
18
Hammouz RY Kostanek JK Dudzisz A,et al. Differential expression of lung adenocarcinoma transcriptome with signature of tobacco exposure[J]. J Appl Genet202061(3):421-437.
19
Qing T Wang XF Jun T,et al. Genomic determinants of homologous recombination deficiency across human cancers[J]. Cancers202113(18):4572.
20
Su RJ Liu Y Wu XM,et al. Dynamically accumulating homologous recombination deficiency score served as an important prognosis factor in high-grade serous ovarian cancer[J]. Front Mol Biosci20218:762741.
21
Wen H Feng Z Ma YT,et al. Homologous recombination deficiency in diverse cancer types and its correlation with platinum chemotherapy efficiency in ovarian cancer[J]. BMC Cancer202222(1):550.
22
Kandoth C McLellan MD Vandin F,et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types[J]. Nature2013502(7471):333-339.
23
Knijnenburg TA Wang LH Zimmermann MT,et al. Genomic and molecular landscape of DNA damage repair deficiency across the cancer genome atlas[J]. Cell Rep201823(1):239-254.e6.
24
Jin MH Oh DY. ATM in DNA repair in cancer[J]. Pharmacol Ther2019203:107391.
25
Ricciuti B Recondo G Spurr LF,et al. Impact of DNA damage response and repair(DDR)gene mutations on efficacy of PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Clin Cancer Res202026(15):4135-4142.
26
Bajrami I Frankum JR Konde A,et al. Genome-wide profiling of genetic synthetic lethality identifies CDK12 as a novel determinant of PARP1/2 inhibitor sensitivity[J]. Cancer Res201474(1):287-297.
27
Hodgson DR Dougherty BA Lai ZW,et al. Candidate biomarkers of PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ovarian cancer beyond the BRCA genes[J]. Br J Cancer2018119(11):1401-1409.
28
Chae YK Anker JF Oh MS,et al. Mutations in DNA repair genes are associated with increased neoantigen burden and a distinct immunophenotype in lung squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Sci Rep20199(1):3235.
29
Chen Y Zheng XB Lin J,et al. A high homologous recombination deficiency score is associated with poor survival and a non-inflamed tumor microenvironment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients[J]. Oral Oncol2022128:105860.
30
Zhou Z Ding ZP Yuan J,et al. Homologous recombination deficiency(HRD)can predict the therapeutic outcomes of immunoneoadjuvant therapy in NSCLC patients[J]. J Hematol Oncol202215(1):62.

基金

重庆英才·创新创业示范团队,新型生物标志物创新转化研究资助项目(CQYC202203091342)

评论

PDF(936 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/