
宫颈LEEP术后发生宫颈管粘连风险模型构建及验证
牟大英, 李艺, 路祥会, 黄露, 陈雪梅, 谢盛言, 李坪原, 谢月
宫颈LEEP术后发生宫颈管粘连风险模型构建及验证
Construction and validation of a risk model of cervical adhesions after cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure
目的 分析子宫颈环形电切术(loop electrosurgical excision procedure,LEEP)术后发生宫颈管粘连的危险因素,建立并验证风险预测模型。 方法 本研究前瞻性选取2021年9月至2022年4月遵义市第一人民医院子宫颈鳞状上皮内病变(cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion,SIL)且行LEEP治疗的200例患者作为研究对象。根据LEEP术后有无发生宫颈管粘连分为粘连组(n=45)和未粘连组(n=155),采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析LEEP术后发生宫颈管粘连的影响因素,基于筛选得到的危险因素建立列线图模型,并对模型的精准度进行验证。 结果 年龄(OR=1.152,95%CI=1.063~1.249)、创面出血(OR=6.602,95%CI=2.652~16.436)、创口感染(OR=6.288,95%CI=2.357~16.772)、切除深度(OR=3.383,95%CI=1.367~8.373)是宫颈管粘连发生的独立危险因素。验证结果:一致性指数(concordance index,CI)为0.904;Hosmer-Lemeshow提示该列线图模型预测LEEP术后发生宫颈管粘连的风险预测值与实际观测值比较,差异未显示统计学意义(χ2=1.810,P=0.840);列线图模型预测LEEP术后发生宫颈管粘连的校正曲线趋近于理想曲线,验证前后的平均绝对误差为0.033;列线图模型预测LEEP术后发生宫颈管粘连的校正曲线和受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)曲线下的面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.904(95%CI=0.858~0.950),灵敏度为0.933,特异度为0.768。 结论 本研究构建的SIL行LEEP术后患者宫颈管粘连发生风险预测模型效果良好,可以有效预测宫颈管粘连的发生,可为早期对患者采取预防性干预措施提供参考。
Objective To analyze risk factors for cervical adhesions after loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP) of the cervix,and to establish and verify a risk prediction model for it. Methods We prospectively selected 200 patients with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions(SILs) who received LEEP treatment in The First People’s Hospital of Zunyi from September 2021 to April 2022. According to the presence or absence of cervical adhesions after LEEP,they were divided into adhesion group(n=45) and non-adhesion group(n=155). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative cervical adhesions. A nomogram model was established based on the selected risk factors,followed by accuracy verification. Results The independent risk factors for postoperative cervical adhesions included age[odds ratio(OR)=1.152,95%CI=1.063-1.249],cervical wound bleeding(OR=6.602,95%CI=2.652-16.436),cervical wound infection(OR=6.288,95%CI=2.357-16.772),and the depth of excision(OR=3.383,95%CI=1.367-8.373). The verification results showed that the CI was 0.904. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed no significant difference between the nomogram model-predicted value and the observed value of the risk of cervical adhesions after LEEP(χ2=1.810,P=0.840). For predicting the occurrence of cervical adhesions after LEEP,the calibration curve of the nomogram model was close to the ideal curve,with the mean absolute error before and after verification being 0.033. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram model predicting the occurrence of postoperative cervical adhesions was 0.904(95%CI=0.858-0.950),with a sensitivity of 0.933 and a specificity of 0.768. Conclusion The established risk prediction model performs well in predicting the occurrence of cervical adhesions in patients with SILs undergoing LEEP,which can provide a reference for early preventive intervention measures for these patients.
cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure / cervical adhesion / risk model construction
R737.33
1 |
裴蕴锋,经先振,周 娟,等. 医院就诊人群HPV感染的流行病学特征及其与宫颈癌/癌前病变的关系[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版),2018,47(3):349-353.
|
2 |
|
3 |
王雅卉,郑颖龄,周 丽. 子宫颈鳞状上皮内病变子宫颈环形电切术术后病变残留或复发情况及影响因素研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2020,35(19):3567-3571.
|
4 |
|
5 |
林 兰,吴冬梅,邓 勇,等. 高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变LEEP术后HPV持续感染的危险因素及预测模型构建[J]. 福建医药杂志,2019,41(6):1-5.
|
6 |
吴雅萌,黄 竹,石汉平. 235例宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ级术后患者临床结局的影响因素分析[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2020,28(19):3387-3391.
|
7 |
张致伟. LEEP术对宫颈上皮内瘤变患者临床指标及症状转归情况研究[J]. 中国医疗器械信息,2020,26(22):78-79.
|
8 |
钱菊芬,陶爱群. 宫颈环形电切术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变疗效比较[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2013,21(4):263-265.
|
9 |
熊娜群,严力锋,徐维才,等. 绝经后宫颈LEEP术后宫颈粘连的影响因素分析[J]. 现代实用医学,2020,32(4):455-456.
|
10 |
周美珍,陈苑红,林飘越. 宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈癌前病变的疗效与并发症发生率分析[J]. 中国医药科学,2019,9(12):101-103,131.
|
11 |
李 翠,夏瑞雪. 宫颈上皮内瘤变患者LEEP术后宫颈粘连发生状况及影响因素[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2021,32(9):1427-1428.
|
12 |
李风艳,郭 晶,王朝霞. 宫颈环形电切术术后宫颈粘连影响因素分析及预防研究[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,10(8):26-29.
|
13 |
周柯宁,何颖颖,范素鸿,等. 不同途径补充雌激素对卵巢早衰女性LEEP术后宫颈创面愈合影响的研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2019,34(9):1980-1983.
|
14 |
王秀花. 宫颈环形电切术术后宫颈粘连影响因素分析及预防研究[J]. 世界复合医学,2021,7(1):40-42.
|
15 |
陈 忆,吴 丹,徐凤英,等. 绝经期患者子宫颈环形电切术后子宫颈狭窄粘连的临床特征分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(5):362-367.
|
16 |
|
17 |
徐志勇,马晓良. 甲状腺癌患者术后复发风险预测的列线图模型建立[J]. 实用肿瘤学杂志,2021,35(1):35-40.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |