机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜关于全子宫切除术在不同体质指数患者中的对比研究

朱梦秋, 易倩琳, 武加林, 陈万丽, 肖琳

PDF(519 KB)
PDF(519 KB)
重庆医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (01) : 70-74. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003401
临床研究 DOI:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003401

机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜关于全子宫切除术在不同体质指数患者中的对比研究

作者信息 +

Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy in patients with different levels of body mass index

Author information +
History +

摘要

目的 比较机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜关于全子宫切除术在不同体质指数患者中的安全性及可行性。 方法 回顾性收集2016年2月至2021年4月于重庆医科大学附属第一医院接受了机器人辅助腹腔镜全子宫切除术(n=416)和传统腹腔镜全子宫切除术(n=725)患者的病例资料。按照不同等级体质指数(body mass index,BMI)对患者进行分层(非超重、超重和肥胖),比较2组中各BMI亚组间患者的围术期情况、术中及术后并发症。 结果 机器人组中超重亚组的手术时间短于传统腹腔镜组[(125.37±50.92) min vs. (135.68±44.55) min],机器人组中3个BMI亚组的术中出血量均少于传统腹腔镜组[(60.46±45.20) mL vs. (92.88±105.13) mL、(72.01±62.03) mL vs. (115.02±123.38) mL及(65.59±37.92) mL vs. (125.16±96.07) mL],机器人组中超重亚组和肥胖亚组的首次排气时间均短于传统腹腔镜组[(2.04±0.83) d vs. (2.19±0.63) d和(1.97±0.54) d vs. (2.19±0.54) d],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。机器人组中各BMI亚组术中及术后总体并发症发生率仍低于腹腔镜组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 超重和肥胖患者的全子宫切除术,机器人辅助腹腔镜相较于传统腹腔镜在围术期降低并发症等方面有一定优势。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy in patients with different levels of body mass index. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the case data of 416 patients who received robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy and 725 patients who received traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy in The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from February 2016 to April 2021. The patients were stratified according to the different levels of body mass index(non-overweight,overweight,and obese),and the two groups and the subgroups based on body mass index were compared in terms of perioperative conditions and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results The overweight subgroup in the robot-assisted laparoscopic group had a significantly shorter time of operation than that in the traditional laparoscopic group[(125.37±50.92) min vs. (135.68±44.55) min,P<0.05],and all three subgroups in the robot-assisted laparoscopic group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss than those in the traditional laparoscopic group[non-overweight:(60.46±45.20) mL vs. (92.88±105.13) mL,P<0.05;overweight:(72.01±62.03) mL vs. (115.02±123.38) mL,P<0.05; obese:(65.59±37.92) mL vs. (125.16±96.07) mL,P<0.05]. The overweight and obese subgroups in the robot-assisted laparoscopic group had a significantly shorter time to first flatus than those in the traditional laparoscopic group[overweight:(2.04±0.83) d vs. (2.19±0.63) d,P<0.05;obese:(1.97±0.54) vs. (2.19±0.54) d,P<0.05]. All three subgroups in the robot-assisted laparoscopic group had a lower overall incidence rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications than those in the traditional laparoscopic group,but with no statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusion As for total hysterectomy in overweight and obese patients,robot-assisted laparoscopy has certain advantages over traditional laparoscopy in reducing perioperative complications.

关键词

机器人辅助腹腔镜 / 传统腹腔镜 / 全子宫切除术 / 体质指数 / 围术期

Key words

robot-assisted laparoscopy / traditional laparoscopy / total hysterectomy / body mass index / perioperative conditions

中图分类号

R713.4

引用本文

导出引用
朱梦秋 , 易倩琳 , 武加林 , . 机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜关于全子宫切除术在不同体质指数患者中的对比研究. 重庆医科大学学报. 2024, 49(01): 70-74 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003401
Zhu Mengqiu, Yi Qianlin, Wu Jialin, et al. Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy in patients with different levels of body mass index[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2024, 49(01): 70-74 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003401

参考文献

1
黎金婷,芦恩婷,田东立,等. 体质量指数对机器人辅助腹腔镜全子宫切除术的影响[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文)20223(1):42-47.
Li JT Lu ET Tian DL,et al. Influence of body mass index on robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. Chin J Rob Surg20223(1):42-47.
2
王海波,李苓妙,胡晓丽,等. 肥胖妇女腹腔镜全子宫切除术并发症比较与风险评估[J]. 解放军医药杂志201931(8):66-69.
Wang HB Li LM Hu XL,et al. Comparison of complications and risk assessment in obese women undergoing laparoscopic complete hysterectomy[J]. Med Pharm J Chin People’s Liberation Army201931(8):66-69.
3
Davidson BA Weber JM Monuzsko KA,et al. Evaluation of surgical morbidity after hysterectomy during an obesity epidemic[J]. Obstet Gynecol2022139(4):589-596.
4
Krane MK Allaix ME Zoccali M,et al. Does morbid obesity change outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease?Review of 626 consecutive cases[J]. J Am Coll Surg2013216(5):986-996.
5
Lagares-Garcia J O'Connell A Firilas A,et al. The influence of body mass index on clinical short-term outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery[J]. Int J Med Robot201612(4):680-685.
6
黄聂笑,肖 琳,马丹,等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下盆腔淋巴结清扫与传统腹腔镜下盆腔淋巴结清扫的对比研究[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文)20201(2):77-85.
Huang NX Xiao L Ma D,et al. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy[J]. Chin J Rob Surg20201(2):77-85.
7
马金香,张文娟,黄婷婷. 机器人辅助腹腔镜对比传统腹腔镜关于全子宫切除术的Meta分析[J]. 医学理论与实践202033(16):2613-2617.
Ma JX Zhang WJ Huang TT. The comparison of robotic-assisted VS conventional laparoscopes for hysterectomy:a meta-analysis[J]. J Med Theory Pract202033(16):2613-2617.
8
李津津,欧阳熙坪,龚 雪,等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜宫颈癌手术的临床对比研究[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文)20201(3):166-173.
Li JJ Ouyang XP Gong X,et al. Clinical comparison between traditional and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in treatment of cervical cancer[J]. Chin J Rob Surg20201(3):166-173.
9
Brunes M Johannesson U Häbel H,et al. Effects of obesity on peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus conventional hysterectomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol202128(2):228-236.
10
El-Achi V Weishaupt J Carter J,et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in morbidly obese women for endometrial cancer[J]. J Robot Surg202115(3):483-487.
11
Kannisto P Harter P Heitz F,et al. Implementation of robot-assisted gynecologic surgery for patients with low and high BMI in a German gynecological cancer center[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet2014290(1):143-148.
12
Montané B Toosi K Velez-Cubian FO,et al. Effect of obesity on perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy[J]. Surg Innov201724(2):122-132.
13
Koythong T Thigpen B Sunkara S,et al. Surgical outcomes of hysterectomy via robot-assisted versus traditional transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol202128(12):2028-2035.
14
Matsuo K Mandelbaum RS Nusbaum DJ,et al. Risk of upper-body adverse events in robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol202128(9):1585-1594.
15
Haveman I van Weelden WJ Roovers EA,et al. Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in different classes of obesity:a cohort study[J]. JSLS202226(1):e2021. 00077.
16
Gracia M García-Santos J Ramirez M,et al. Value of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer by body mass index[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2020150(3):398-405.

评论

PDF(519 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/