Evaluation of engagement in blended teaching and its influencing factors

Lü Yalan, Hou Xiaorong

PDF(1788 KB)
PDF(1788 KB)
Medical Education Management ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 86-91. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2025.01.015
Investigation

Evaluation of engagement in blended teaching and its influencing factors

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To analyze the engagement in blended learning and its influencing factors to provide references for optimizing the blended teaching model and improving learning engagement. Methods Student engagement and related data were obtained through a questionnaire survey, and multiple linear regression models were used to analyze the influencing factors of learning engagement. Results After implementing blended learning in the course, students showed high engagement scores in all six sub-dimensions and total learning engagement. Learning engagement was positively correlated with academic performance without significant statistical differences. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that students' self-efficacy, the presentation and delivery of resources, and the perceived gains were significantly positively correlated with learning engagement. Satisfaction with seven aspects of blended learning significantly influenced different sub-dimensions of learning engagement. Conclusion Blended learning effectively promotes students' engagement. When designing blended learning, attention should be paid to the selection of teaching platforms, reconstruction of teaching content, development of online teaching resources, training of teachers' teaching abilities, and the objective design and interpretation of process evaluation indicators.

Key words

information literacy / blended teaching / learning engagement / effectiveness evaluation / influencing factors

Cite this article

Download Citations
Lü Yalan , Hou Xiaorong. Evaluation of engagement in blended teaching and its influencing factors. Medical Education Management. 2025, 11(1): 86-91 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2025.01.015

References

1
谭颖思. 国内外混合式教学研究现状综述[J]. 中国多媒体与网络教学学报:中旬刊2019(8): 42-43.
2
李学庆, 黄常青, 薛华, 等. 基于中国大学MOOC平台的《信息检索》课混合式教学的学习评价——以福建农林大学为例[J]. 办公自动化202227(23): 11-13.
3
贺映兰, 林濂瑜, 李文波. 高校文献检索课程的混合式在线教学实践[J]. 情报探索2021(2): 96-104.
4
陈晓红, 高凡, 朱维凤, 等. 信息素养SPOC混合教学模式的设计与实现[J]. 图书情报工作202266(9): 74-81.
5
章思思, 朱碧纯. 基于SPOC的混合式教学在医学文献检索课程中的应用[J]. 温州医科大学学报202151(6): 510-513, 517.
6
马婧, 周倩. 国际混合学习领域热点主题与前沿趋势研究——基于科学知识图谱方法的实证分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)201937(4): 116-128.
7
马婧, 韩锡斌, 程建钢. 促进学习投入的混合教学活动设计研究[J]. 清华大学教育研究201839(3): 67-75, 92.
8
何克抗. 从Blending Learning看教育技术理论的新发展(下)[J]. 电化教育研究2004(4): 22-26.
9
马婧, 周倩. 混合式环境下大学生学习性投入维度构成及其实证研究[J]. 教育发展研究201939(13): 54-65.
10
乔晓熔. 中学生数学学习自我决定及其与数学学习投入的关系[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2006.
11
梁静. 混合式教学模式提升大学生课堂学习投入水平的准实验研究[J]. 高教学刊2019(2): 59-60, 64.
12
李芳, 敖博, 陈柯璇, 等. 混合式教学提升大学生学习投入度的效果研究[J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践20236(5): 145-148.
13
Graham C R.Blended learning systems:definition, current trends,and future directions[M]//Handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2006: 3-21.
14
刘海燕, 张元敏. 大学生英语学习投入与学习成绩的相关性[J]. 黑龙江科学202314(13): 132-134.
15
刘玲, 汪琼. 混合教学模式下学生学习投入的特点及影响因素研究[J]. 现代教育技术202131(11): 80-86.
16
汪雅霜. 大学生学习投入度对学习收获影响的实证研究——基于多层线性模型的分析结果[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报2015(7): 76-81.
17
万昆, 饶宸瑞, 徐如梦. 国际教育领域学习投入度研究的焦点与转向[J]. 现代教育技术202131(4): 36-43.

吕亚兰:设计研究方案,收集、分析资料,撰写论文;侯筱蓉:设计研究方案,修改、审校论文。

Comments

PDF(1788 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/