
Relationship between the perception of medical education environment and students' autonomy in learning in pediatric blended learning
Liu Fang, Yu Shiqian, Wei Li, Niu Ping, He Xiaoqin, Ye Jingping, Yao Baozhen
Relationship between the perception of medical education environment and students' autonomy in learning in pediatric blended learning
Objective To analyze the relationship between the perception of the medical education environment based on pediatric blended learning and students' autonomy in learning. Methods The clinical medicine students from the First Clinical School of Wuhan University who had completed the blended learning courses in pediatrics were enrolled as participants. The Dundee ready education environment measure (DREEM) scale and the autonomy in learning rating scale for college students were adopted to investigate the perception of the medical education environment and autonomy in learning. Results The perception of the medical education environment among the clinical medicine students was generally positive. The order of score rating among dimensions was as follows: perception of teachers > perception of learning > perception of academic atmosphere > perception of environment > social and self-perception. The scores for self-regulation, learning strategies, content and environment, learning motivation, and overall autonomy in learning were 67.85%, 72.86%, 65.56%, 70.63%, and 68.97%, respectively. The result of the correlation analysis revealed that the scores of the internal dimensions of both the DREEM scale and the Autonomy in Learning Rating Scale for college students were significantly positively correlated with their own total scores (P<0.05). Moreover, there were significant positive correlations observed among the scores of different dimensions within each scale (P<0.05). Additionally, the scores of each dimension and the total score of the Autonomy in Learning Rating Scale for college students were significantly positively correlated with the scores of different dimensions and the total score of the DREEM scale (P<0.05). Conclusion Clinical medicine students who experienced pediatric blended learning had a generally positive perception of the medical education environment, and their autonomy in learning was good and closely related to their perception of the medical education environment. In the implementation of blended learning, continuous optimization of teaching content, improvement of the teaching proficiency of teachers, and proactive enhancement of the medical education environment will help enhance clinical medicine students' satisfaction with the educational environment, as well as their learning interest and autonomy in learning, thus promoting the sustainable development of medical education reforms more effectively.
medical education environment / autonomy in learning / blended learning / clinical medicine / Dundee ready education environment measure
1 |
|
2 |
王美燕, 张丽, 刘文光. 《儿科学》混合式教学改革的探索与实践[J]. 教育现代化, 2019, 6(84): 68-69.
|
3 |
何振涛, 陈德晖, 蔡勇, 等. 混合式教学在儿科学教学中的应用[J]. 广州医科大学学报, 2021, 49(2): 101-103.
|
4 |
崔坤华, 何欢. 混合式教学模式在儿科临床教学中的应用[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2022(28): 147-150.
|
5 |
单天明, 曹阳, 孙宝志. 医学教育环境测量评价的实践与探索[J]. 医学与哲学, 2007, 28(1): 75-76.
|
6 |
李德志, 王平. 医学教育环境感知对医学生学习投入的影响:学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2020, 49(4): 357-361.
|
7 |
|
8 |
单天明, 孙宝志. 医学教育环境测量与高等医学教育改革[J]. 医学教育, 2005(2): 91-94.
|
9 |
杨扬, 陈贤义, 向浩, 等. 基于DREEM量表的公共卫生人才培养新模式实施效果的研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2016, 36(3): 362-366.
|
10 |
苏中平, 赵婷, 叶鹏, 等. 医学生自主学习能力与教育环境的适应性探究[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2014(8): 12-13, 17.
|
11 |
袁红梅. 大学生学习自主性量表的修订及区域性常模的建立[D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2005.
|
12 |
宫德馨, 王培琳, 韩莉, 等. 五年制和八年制医学生对教育环境知觉的对比研究[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2019(3): 16-17.
|
13 |
邹莉, 周蕾, 熊健, 等. “互联网+教育”模式对大学生自主学习能力的影响[J]. 科教导刊-电子版: 下旬, 2021(6): 1-2.
|
14 |
王宇, 张发钦, 覃雪梅, 等. 大学生自主学习方式与高校思政课实践教学模式适配性调查分析[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2018(19): 68-70.
|
15 |
葛华, 腰昕月, 古丽斯坦·艾则孜, 等. 医学本科生学业情绪与自主学习能力关系的调查研究[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2022(9): 23-25.
|
16 |
陈闽君. 基于学习者视角的大学生在线课堂学习自主性研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2022.
|
17 |
何松霖, 王金华. 医学教育环境评估量表在我国口腔医学生中应用的信度与效度分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(1): 109-112.
|
18 |
余娟. 五年制医学生学习自主性现状调查[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2013, 33(2): 253-255.
|
刘芳:提出研究思路,数据分析,撰写论文;余诗倩、魏丽、牛萍:实施研究过程,调研,分析结果;何晓琴、姚宝珍:数据获取与分析,审定论文;叶静萍:设计研究方案,总体把关,审定论文。
/
〈 |
|
〉 |