目的 比较非麻醉专业本科生线上见习与传统见习效果。 方法 将2022年7月4日和2020年6月28日在首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院麻醉科见习的首都医科大学公共卫生医学事业管理专业46名学生分成两组，2022年7月4日的见习学生24名为传统组，采用线下麻醉科见习方法；2020年6月28日的见习学生22名为线上组，采用“腾讯会议直播+操作视频分享+班级微信群答疑”的线上麻醉见习方法。采用问卷调查方式对教学整体满意度和考试成绩进行评价。 结果 传统组与线上组麻醉见习整体满意度分别为100%和95.45%（P＞0.05）。两组试卷成绩和正确率相比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。线上组86.36%学生有参与传统见习的意愿。 结论 线上见习与传统见习相比较，整体满意度较高、考试成绩较好，可作为传统见习无法进行时的替代方案。

Objective To compare the effect of online and offline on anesthesia training for non-anesthesia undergraduate students. Methods A total of 46 students majoring in public health medicine management from Capital Medical University were divided into traditional group and online group. Twenty-four students for internship on July 4, 2022 were classified as the traditional group, and the traditional offline anesthesia training method was adopted. Twenty-two students for internship on June 28, 2020 were classified as the online group, and the hybrid online anesthesia training method of Tencent conference + operation video sharing + Q&A in class wechat group was adopted. Questionnaire survey was used to evaluate the overall teaching satisfaction and test scores. Results The overall satisfaction of traditional group and online group were 100% and 95.45% (P＞0.05), respectively. There was no statistical difference in the scores and accuracy rate between the two groups (P＞0.05). Eigty-six point thiry-six percent of the students in the online group were more eager for offline anesthesia training. Conclusion There were also higher overall satisfaction and better test results on the hybrid online anesthesia training compared with the traditional training, and hybrid online training can be used as a substitute during the special time.