随着研究生招生规模逐年扩大，研究生培养质量备受关注。学位论文不仅反映了研究生学习阶段的科研成果，同时也是研究生教育质量的重要标志。本文以首都医科大学基础医学院为例，分析现行研究生学位论文双盲评审机制的意义与优缺点，并依据实践中发现的问题，提出改进的建议与措施，以期进一步完善双盲评审机制，提高研究生培养水平。

As the postgraduates enrollment scale expands year by year, the quality of postgraduate cultivation has attracted much attention. The dissertation is not only a reflection of the scientific achievements of the postgraduate during their study period, but also an important symbol of the quality of postgraduate education. Taking School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University as an example, this paper analyzes the significance, advantages and disadvantages of the current double-blind review of postgraduate dissertations. Based on the problems found in practice, suggestions and measures for improvement are proposed to further improve the double-blind review and enhance the level of postgraduate cultivation.