血清CitH3、PCT及IL-10检测对体外心肺复苏后急性肺损伤的预测价值

王晓宁, 孙家安, 王燕, 段浩朋

PDF(756 KB)
PDF(756 KB)
西南医科大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1) : 58-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3351.2025.01.012
临床医学研究

血清CitH3、PCT及IL-10检测对体外心肺复苏后急性肺损伤的预测价值

作者信息 +

Prognostic Value of Serum CitH3, PCT and IL-10 in Acute Lung Injury after Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Author information +
History +

摘要

目的 探究血清瓜氨酸组蛋白H3(citrullinated histone H3,CitH3)、降钙素原(procalcitonin,PCT)及白细胞介素-10(interleukin-10,IL-10)对体外心肺复苏(extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation,ECPR)后急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)的预测价值。 方法 择取2021年1月至2024年4月行ECPR的患者126例,入院次日空腹采血测定患者血清CitH3、PCT、IL⁃10水平。根据ECPR后ALI发生与否分为ALI组与非ALI组,对比两组临床资料及血清CitH3、PCT、IL-10水平,Logistic多因素回归分析ECPR后ALI发生的危险因素。另外受试者工作特征(receive operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析血清CitH3、PCT、IL-10对ALI的预测价值。 结果 因6例患者未配合完成相关检查等被剔除,最终纳入120例患者,其中住院期间ALI发生28例(ALI组),ALI未发生92例(非ALI组)。ALI组入院时急性生理学和慢性健康状况评分(Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Scoring System, APACHE Ⅱ)、序贯器官衰竭评估(Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, SOFA)、心肺复苏到自主循环恢复时间均大于非ALI组(P < 0.05);ALI组血清CitH3、PCT、IL-10水平均高于非ALI组(P < 0.05)。Logistic多因素回归分析显示心肺复苏到自主循环恢复时间、血清CitH3、PCT及IL-10是ALI发生的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。ROC曲线显示,血清CitH3、PCT、IL-10单一及3项联合预测ALI发生的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)分别为0.886、0.837、0.852、0.951,3项联合的AUC均大于PCT、IL-10单一检测(P < 0.05)。 结论 ECPR后ALI发生患者血清CitH3、PCT、IL-10水平上升,对ALI发生有一定的预测价值,特别是联合检测效能更显著。

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of serum citrullinated histone H3 (CitH3), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin⁃10 (IL⁃10) in predicting (Acute Lung Injury)ALI after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Methods A total of 126 patients who underwent ECPR from January 2021 to April 2024 were chosen, and fasting blood samples were collected the next day after admission to determine the levels of serum CitH3, PCT and IL⁃10. They were separated into the ALI group and the non⁃ALI group, according to whether ALI occurred after ECPR. Clinical data, serum CitH3, PCT, and IL-10 levels were compared. The risk factors of ALI after ECPR were analyzed by Logistic multivariate regression. The predictive value of serum CitH3, PCT, and IL-10 for ALI was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Out of 6 patients, those who did not cooperate to complete the relevant examinations were excluded, resulting in 120 patients. During their hospital stay, 28 cases of ALI occurred(the ALI group), while 92 cases did not have ALI(the non⁃ALI group). The ALI group showed higher scores of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Scoring System(APACH Ⅱ), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA), and recovery time from cardiopulmonary resuscitation to spontaneous circulation (P < 0.05). Serum CitH3, PCT, and IL-10 levels in the ALI group were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that the recovery time from cardiopulmonary resuscitation to spontaneous circulation, serum CitH3, PCT, and IL-10 were independent risk factors for ALI (P < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) for serum CitH3, PCT, and IL-10 individually were 0.886, 0.837, and 0.852, respectively. The AUC for the combined detection of the three markers was 0.951, which was significantly higher than that of the individual detections of PCT and IL-10 (P < 0.05). Conclusions Serum levels of CitH3, PCT, and IL-10 in ALI patients increased after ECPR, indicating a certain predictive value for the occurrence of ALI, with especially notable results when these markers were detected in combination.

关键词

体外心肺复苏 / 急性肺损伤 / 瓜氨酸组蛋白H3 / 降钙素原 / 白细胞介素-10

Key words

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation / Acute lung injury / Citrulline histone H3 / Procalcitonin / Interleukin-10

中图分类号

R605.97

引用本文

导出引用
王晓宁 , 孙家安 , 王燕 , . 血清CitH3、PCT及IL-10检测对体外心肺复苏后急性肺损伤的预测价值. 西南医科大学学报. 2025, 48(1): 58-62 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-3351.2025.01.012
Xiaoning WANG, Jiaan SUN, Yan WANG, et al. Prognostic Value of Serum CitH3, PCT and IL-10 in Acute Lung Injury after Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation[J]. Journal of Southwest Medical University. 2025, 48(1): 58-62 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-3351.2025.01.012

参考文献

1
GAISENDREES C, POOTH JS, LUEHR M, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2023, 120(42): 703-710.
2
ABRAMS D, MACLAREN G, LORUSSO R, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: evidence and implications[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2022, 48(1): 1-15.
3
纪孟君, 赵艳梅, 路倩颖, 等. 体外膜肺氧合在严重创伤患者救治中的并发症及其防治策略研究进展[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2023, 39(2): 178-184.
4
范明华, 张铭, 梁晔, 等. 大鼠慢性肺部感染刺激抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体产生及其机制[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2019, 35(8): 603-610.
5
YANG X, ZENG J, YU X, et al. PCT, IL-6, and IL-10 facilitate early diagnosis and pathogen classifications in bloodstream infection[J]. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2023, 22(1): 103.
6
MILLAR MW, FAZAL F, RAHMAN A. Therapeutic targeting of NF-κB in acute lung injury: a double-edged sword[J]. Cells, 2022, 11(20): 3317.
7
关小容, 付斌, 郑永先, 等. 血清瓜氨酸化组蛋白H3、沉默信号调节因子1检测在急诊脓毒症患者病情及预后评估中应用研究[J]. 创伤与急危重病医学, 2021, 9(4): 268-271.
8
王婷, 韦小碗, 杨亮, 等. 脓毒症患者血清PCT、CRP、IL-6和IL-10水平检测及临床意义[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2020, 49(11): 1510-1514.
9
中华医学会急诊医学分会复苏学组, 成人体外心肺复苏专家共识组. 成人体外心肺复苏专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2018, 27(1):22-29.
10
颜艳, 王彤. 医学统计学[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020: 252- 254.
11
中华医学会重症医学分会. 急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断和治疗指南(2006)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2007, 27(1): 1-6.
12
DONNINO MW, SALCICCIOLI JD, DEJAM A, et al. APACHE Ⅱ scoring to predict outcome in post-cardiac arrest[J]. Resuscitation, 2013, 84(5): 651-656.
13
VINCENT JL, DE MENDONÇA A, CANTRAINE F, et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. working group on “sepsis-related problems” of the European society of intensive care medicine[J]. Crit Care Med, 1998, 26(11): 1793-1800.
14
常影, 刘泽雄, 季晓鹏, 等. 体外循环肺损伤机制与肺保护策略研究进展[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2023, 39(7): 817-821.
15
XIA L, ZHANG C, LV N, et al. AdMSC-derived exosomes alleviate acute lung injury via transferring mitochondrial component to improve homeostasis of alveolar macrophages[J]. Theranostics, 2022, 12(6): 2928-2947.
16
GE P, LUO Y, OKOYE CS, et al. Intestinal barrier damage, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and acute lung injury: a troublesome trio for acute pancreatitis[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2020, 132: 110770.
17
李锋, 吴新杰, 陈启江, 等. 青蒿素对猪心脏骤停复苏后肺损伤的影响及其机制[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2023, 14(3): 520-527.
18
LI M, LIN C, LESO A, et al. Quantification of citrullinated histone H3 bound DNA for detection of neutrophil extracellular traps[J]. Cancers, 2020, 12(11): 3424.
19
李聪, 李丽丽, 刘辉. 老年脓毒症患者血清SDC-1、CitH3水平表达及临床意义[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(22): 92-96.
20
KUMAR S, PAYAL N, SRIVASTAVA VK, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps and organ dysfunction in sepsis[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2021, 523: 152-162.
21
王锦, 谢晶, 吕利玉. 血清瓜氨酸化组蛋白H3预测急性胰腺炎严重程度和住院病死率的临床价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2022, 23(10): 696-702.
22
吕魁, 孙俊峰, 杨健鹰. 血清C反应蛋白、降钙素原、D-二聚体在急性胰腺炎患者中的表达及与严重程度床边指数和肺损伤的相关性[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2023, 52(10): 1375-1378.
23
WANG K, WANG MY, LIAO XM, et al. Locally organised and activated Fth1hi neutrophils aggravate inflammation of acute lung injury in an IL-10-dependent manner[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13: 7703.
24
VIVAS MC, VILLAMARÍN-GUERRERO HF, SANCHEZ CA. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) 1082 promoter polymorphisms and plasma IL-10 levels in patients with bacterial sepsis[J]. Rom J Intern Med, 2021, 59(1): 50-57.
25
李京宴, 田英平, 高恒波, 等. 脓毒症患者继发急性肺损伤的危险因素及早期预测价值[J]. 中国急救医学, 2022, 42(6): 487-492.
26
孙姣姣, 王甜, 李小林, 等. 金黄色葡萄球菌感染引起急性肺损伤的风险预警模型构建[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2023, 41(5): 338-343.
27
李中士, 兰超, 张文华, 等. Alb、PCT及NT-proBNP检测与重症肺炎致ARDS患者病情的相关性及预后评估效能[J]. 西南医科大学学报, 2023, 46(6): 509-512, 523.
28
黄莉, 林丽娥, 符祥俊, 等. 血清IL-10、PCT水平预测老年急性髓细胞白血病化疗患者继发性感染的价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2022, 42(10): 2371-2374.

基金

河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(20B320024)

评论

PDF(756 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/