
屏障材料自体浓缩生长因子膜和骨胶原在后牙区牙槽嵴保存术中的应用:一项1年随访的前瞻性队列研究
朱湛枫, 杨婷婷, 陈沁怡, 邱伟恩, 黎詠珊, 林意蓝, 班宇
屏障材料自体浓缩生长因子膜和骨胶原在后牙区牙槽嵴保存术中的应用:一项1年随访的前瞻性队列研究
Concentrated growth factor and collagen as barrier materials in alveolar ridge preservation for posterior teeth: a prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up
目的 评价自体浓缩生长因子(CGF)膜和骨胶原作为屏障材料在后牙区牙槽嵴保存术(ARP)术后1年的骨组织保存效果。 方法 选取三壁及以上骨缺损需接受后牙区牙槽嵴保存术治疗的24例患者为研究对象,随机分配至CGF组(12例)和骨胶原组(Collagen组)(12例)。2组患者均拔除无法保留后牙,拔牙窝内填充异种移植物骨替代物Bio‐Oss®至拔牙前牙槽嵴顶处,CGF组将制取的CGF膜覆盖于骨替代材料上缘并封闭创口,Collagen组采用Bio-Oss® Collagen覆盖并封闭创口。牙槽峭保存术后6个月植入种植体。采用锥形束CT测量分析术后即刻、6个月和1年的垂直牙槽嵴骨高度和水平牙槽嵴骨宽度变化,评估种植术中再植骨率和植体存留率。采用SPSS 28.0软件对数据进行统计学分析。 结果 24例患者均完成术后1年随访,无1例退出试验或失访,无1例出现术后感染、出血和种植体周病等。术后6个月CGF组的垂直牙槽嵴骨高度减少量低于Collagen组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1年CGF组和Collagen组垂直牙槽嵴骨高度的减少量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6个月、术后1年CGF组和Collagen组水平牙槽嵴骨宽度的减少量差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组种植术中再植骨率均为16.7%,植体存留率为100%。 结论 CGF膜和Bio-Oss® Collagen作为后牙区牙槽嵴保存术的屏障材料,均能有效减少拔牙后牙槽骨吸收,保存牙槽骨。
Objective This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of concentrated growth factor (CGF) membrane and collagen as barrier materials in sealing the alveolar socket in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the posterior region during a one-year follow-up. Methods A total of 24 patients who underwent ARP in the posterior region were selected for inclusion and randomly assigned to the CGF group (12 cases) and Collagen group (12 cases). The patients in both groups underwent extraction of posterior teeth. The extraction sockets were filled with a bone substitute to the level of the pre-extraction buccal and lingual or palatal alveolar bone plates. The wounds in the CGF group were closed with a fabricated CGF overlaying the upper edge of the bone substitute material, whereas those in the Collagen group were closed with Bio-Oss Collagen. The implants were placed after 6 months. The evaluation was based on implant retention, re-grafting rate, and vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge bone volume changes measured by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 28.0 software. Results No patient withdrew throughout the follow-up period. No implant failure and no severe peri-implant or mucosal soft tissue complications were observed. Six months after the operation, the degree of vertical alveolar ridge height resorption in the CGF group was lower than that in the Collagen group (P<0.05). There were no statistically difference between the groups at 1 year after the operation (P>0.05). The amount of bone reduction in horizontal alveolar ridge width showed no difference between the groups at 6 months and 1 year after surgery (P>0.05). Conclusion CGF membrane and Bio-Oss Collagen as barrier materials for posterior ARP inhibited reduction in alveolar ridge bone mass.
alveolar ridge preservation / concentrated growth factor / collagen
R783.4
1 | Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(): 1-21. |
2 | Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 4: CD010176. |
3 | Majzoub J, Ravida A, Starch-Jensen T, et al. The influence of different grafting materials on alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2019, 10(3): e6. |
4 | 刘怡. 位点保存技术的现状与未来[J]. 口腔医学, 2016, 36(7): 577-582. |
4 | Liu Y. Current status and future of site preservation techniques[J]. Stomatology, 2016, 36(7): 577-582. |
5 | Li Z, Liu L, Wang L, et al. The effects and potential applications of concentrated growth factor in dentin-pulp complex regeneration[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2021, 12(1): 357. |
6 | Qiao J, An N, Ouyang X. Quantification of growth factors in different platelet concentrates[J]. Platelets, 2017, 28(8): 774-778. |
7 | Rodella LF, Favero G, Boninsegna R, et al. Growth factors, CD34 positive cells, and fibrin network analysis in concentrated growth factors fraction[J]. Microsc Res Te-ch, 2011, 74(8): 772-777. |
8 | Palermo A, Giannotti L, Di Chiara Stanca B, et al. Use of CGF in oral and implant surgery: from laboratory evidence to clinical evaluation[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(23): 15164. |
9 | Liu Y, Li X, Jiang C, et al. Clinical applications of concentrated growth factors membrane for sealing the soc-ket in alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2022, 8(1): 46. |
10 | Meloni SM, Tallarico M, Lolli FM, et al. Postextraction socket preservation using epithelial connective tissue graft vs porcine collagen matrix. 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2015, 8(1): 39-48. |
11 | Ying Y, Li B, Liu C, et al. A biodegradable gelatin-based nanostructured sponge with space maintenance to enhan-ce long-term osteogenesis in maxillary sinus augmentation[J]. J Biomater Appl, 2021, 35(6): 681-695. |
12 | 王健, 胡秀莲, 林野. Bio-oss和Bio-oss骨胶原保持牙槽骨量的临床研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2009, 23(1): 4-6. |
12 | Wang J, Hu XL, Lin Y. Early changes of alveolar ridge contour following ridge preservation using Bio-oss and Bio-oss collagen[J]. J Modern Stomatol, 2009, 23(1): 4-6. |
13 | 徐丹, 姚淳, 顾敏. Bio-Oss骨粉和Bio-Oss骨胶原位点保存的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 414-417. |
13 | Xu D, Yao C, Gu M. Clinical study of Bio-Oss powder and Bio-Oss collagen for site preservation during implantology[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2020, 29(4): 414-417. |
14 | 杨婷婷, 邱伟恩, 陈沁怡, 等. 两种材料联合Bio-Oss骨粉在后牙区拔牙位点保存术中的应用效果研究[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2022, 15(2): 161-166. |
14 | Yang TT, Qiu WE, Chen XY, et al. Clinical evaluation of Bio-Oss? combined with two materials in alveolar ridge preservation of posterior teeth[J]. Chin J Pract Stomatol, 2022, 15(2): 161-166. |
15 | Heberer S, Al-Chawaf B, Hildebrand D, et al. Histomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets augmented with Bio-Oss Collagen after a 6-week healing period: a prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(12): 1219-1225. |
16 | Maciel J, Momesso GA, Ramalho-Ferreira G, et al. Bone healing evaluation in critical-size defects treated with xenogenous bone plus porcine collagen[J]. Implant Dent, 2017, 26(2): 296-302. |
17 | Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Hayacibara R, et al. Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced-augmen-ted and non-augmented-defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(5): 435-440. |
18 | 邱伟恩, 杨婷婷, 胡涵韬, 等. 三种材料封闭磨牙牙槽嵴保存术创的早期评价[J]. 中国美容医学, 2023, 32(5): 137-142. |
18 | Qiu WE, Yang TT, Hu HT, et al. Early clinical efficacy evaluation of three materials in molar alveolar ridge pre-servation[J]. Chin J Aesthet Med, 2023, 32(5): 137-142. |
19 | Nurden AT. Platelets, inflammation and tissue regeneration[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2011, 105(): S13-S33. |
20 | Krishnakumar D, Mahendra J, Ari G, et al. A clinical and histological evaluation of platelet-rich fibrin and CGF for root coverage procedure using coronally advan-ced flap: a split-mouth design[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2019, 30(6): 970-974. |
21 | Grainger DJ, Mosedale DE, Metcalfe JC. TGF-beta in blood: a complex problem[J]. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2000, 11(1/2): 133-145. |
22 | Masuki H, Okudera T, Watanebe T, et al. Growth factor and pro-inflammatory cytokine contents in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF), and concentrated growth factors (CGF)[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2016, 2(1): 19. |
23 | Wang X, Wang G, Zhao X, et al. Short-term evaluation of guided bone reconstruction with titanium mesh membranes and CGF membranes in immediate implantation of anterior maxillary tooth[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021: 4754078. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |