
激光及涂层表面处理对氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响
杜桥, 牛光良
激光及涂层表面处理对氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响
Effect of laser and coating surface treatment on the bond strength of zirconia ceramics
目的 探讨Er: YAG激光、Nd: YAG激光及硅锆涂层处理氧化锆陶瓷表面对其粘接强度的影响。 方法 用粉末压片机制作直径为18 mm、厚度为1.5 mm的氧化锆预烧结圆形瓷片,按照伪随机数字表法随机分为5组,分别接受不处理烧结(空白对照组)、烧结后氧化铝颗粒喷砂(喷砂组)、烧结后Er: YAG激光照射(Er: YAG激光组)、烧结后Nd: YAG激光照射(Nd: YAG激光组)、硅锆涂层后烧结(硅锆涂层组)表面处理,用树脂粘接剂粘接氧化锆陶瓷与复合树脂柱,用万能测试机进行剪切强度测试,体式显微镜下观察并记录断裂破坏模式,粗糙度测量仪测量瓷片表面粗糙度,扫描电子显微镜下观察表面微观形貌,能谱仪分析表面元素组成。 结果 剪切粘接强度测试结果表明,硅锆涂层组的剪切粘接强度高于其余各组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);喷砂组与Er: YAG激光组的粘接强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但均高于Nd: YAG激光组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。粗糙度测量结果表明,硅锆涂层组的表面粗糙度高于其余各组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);喷砂组、Er: YAG激光组和Nd: YAG激光组的表面粗糙度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但均高于空白对照组(P<0.05)。扫描电子显微镜下观察可见,喷砂组表面可见无规则深浅不同的划痕,Er: YAG激光组表面可见激光作用形成的较大凹坑,较大凹坑中可见散在较小的孔洞,氧化锆晶体结构消失,取而代之的是局部熔融形成的相对平整表面,表面可见大量裂纹。Nd: YAG激光组表面可见激光作用区形成凹坑,凹坑表面可见大量裂纹形成。硅锆涂层组表面可见较为复杂的多孔结构,可见大量“小岛样”结构,“小岛样”结构表面及其周围沟壑内可见大量氧化锆晶粒,晶粒间存在大量微小孔隙。空白对照组、Er: YAG激光组及Nd: YAG激光组表面仅有Zr、O、Y元素,喷砂组表面可见Al元素存在,硅锆涂层组可见较高比例的Si元素。 结论 Er: YAG激光及Nd: YAG激光处理氧化锆陶瓷表面可使其粗糙度增加,提高与树脂粘接剂间的粘接强度。硅锆涂层处理能增加氧化锆表面粗糙度和粘接强度,且效果优于喷砂及激光处理。
Objective This study aims to investigate bond strength between zirconia and resin cement through surface treatments with Er: YAG laser, Nd: YAG laser, and Si-Zr coating. Methods Seventy-five round pre-sintered zirconia discs with a diameter of 18 mm and a thickness of 1.5 mm were prepared by a powder compactor. Fifty discs were randomly divided into five groups of 10 discs each and were subjected to five surface treatments: no treatment (control group), sandblasting with alumina particles (sandblasting group), Er: YAG laser treatment (Er: YAG laser group), Nd:YAG laser treatment (Nd: YAG laser group), and Si-Zr coating treatment (Si-Zr coating group). The discs were then bonded to composite resin columns with resin cement. The shear bond strength of each group was tested with a universal tester. Roughness tester, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy were used to analyze surface performance. Results The bond strength of the Si-Zr coating group was higher than that of the remaining groups (P<0.05). The difference in bond strength between the sandblasting group and the Er: YAG laser group was not statistically significant (P>0.05), but both of them had higher bond strength than the Nd: YAG laser group (P<0.05). The Si-Zr coating group had the highest surface roughness (P<0.05). The surface roughness of the sandblasting, Er: YAG laser, and Nd: YAG laser groups was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05), but the difference among the three groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). SEM observations showed irregular scratches on the surface of the sandblasting group and large pits with holes on the surface of the Er: YAG and Nd: YAG laser groups. In the Er: YAG laser group, the crystal structure was replaced by a smooth surface with a large amount of microcracks due to partial melting. Complex porous structures that comprised “island-like” structures and mass pores among the grains were observed on the surface of the Si-Zr coating. Only Zr, O, and Y were detected on the surfaces of the control, Er: YAG laser, and Nd: YAG laser groups. Al was found on the surface of the sandblasted group, and a higher proportion of Si was detected on the surface of the Si-Zr coating group. Conclusion Er: YAG laser and Nd: YAG laser treatment on the zirconia ceramic surface could increase roughness and improve the bond strength to resin cement. Si-Zr coating treatment is an effective alternative for increasing the roughness and bond strength of zirconia surface and is superior to sandblasting and laser treatments.
zirconia / surface treatment / bond strength / laser / coating
R783.2
1 | Maciel LC, Amaral M, Queiroz DA, et al. The effect of repeated surface treatment of zirconia on its bond strength to resin cement[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020, 12(5): 291-298. |
2 | Joukhadar C, Osman E, Rayyan M, et al. Comparison between different surface treatment methods on shear bond strength of zirconia (in vitro study)[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2020, 12(3): e264-e270. |
3 | Moqbel NM, Al-Akhali M, Wille S, et al. Influence of aging and surface treatment on the composite bond strength to translucent 3Y-TZP zirconia[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2022, 24(1): 375-384. |
4 | 杜桥, 牛光良. 氧化锆的表面粗化和改性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(1): 97-101. |
4 | Du Q, Niu GL. Surface roughening zirconia and modification[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2015, 42(1): 97-101. |
5 | Su Z, Li M, Zhang L, et al. A novel porous silica-zirconia coating for improving bond performance of dental zirconia[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2021, 22(3): 214-222. |
6 | Uno S, Okada M, Taketa H, et al. Toughening of highly translucent zirconia by monoclinic ZrO2 and SiO2 particle coating[J]. Dent Mater J, 2020, 39(2): 295-301. |
7 | Akar T, Dündar A, K?rmal? ?, et al. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of zirconia to a self-adhesive resin cement after different surface treatment[J]. Dent Med Probl, 2021, 58(4): 463-472. |
8 | da Silva BTF, Trevelin LT, Schroeter AC, et al. Effect of silica coating and laser treatment on the flexural strength, surface characteristics, and bond strength of a dental zirconia[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2021, 129(1): e12754. |
9 | Henriques B, Fabris D, Souza JCM, et al. Bond strength enhancement of zirconia-porcelain interfaces via Nd: YAG laser surface structuring[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2018, 81: 161-167. |
10 | Zhang X, Dong H, Wu X, et al. Evaluation of Er: YAG laser energy transmitted through novel dental zirconia ceramics[J]. Dent Mater J, 2023, 42(5): 669-675. |
11 | Asadzadeh N, Ghorbanian F, Ahrary F, et al. Bond strength of resin cement and glass ionomer to Nd: YAG laser-treated zirconia ceramics[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(4): e881-e885. |
12 | Hatami M, Lotfi-Kamran M, Davari A, et al. Effect of different laser treatments on the shear bond strength of zirconia ceramic to resin cement[J]. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 2021, 18: 56. |
13 | Akhavan Zanjani V, Ahmadi H, Nateghifard A, et al. Effect of different laser surface treatment on microshear bond strength between zirconia ceramic and resin cement[J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2015, 6(4): 294-300. |
14 | Moretto SG, de Freitas PM, Inca HEC, et al. Influence of Er: YAG laser surface treatment on flexural and bond strengths to glass-infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2021, 36(7): 1487-1495. |
15 | Arami S, Tabatabae MH, Namdar SF, et al. Effects of different lasers and particle abrasion on surface characteristics of zirconia ceramics[J]. J Dent (Tehran), 2014, 11(2): 233-241. |
16 | Yassaei S, Aghili HA, Davari A, et al. Effect of four methods of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to zirconium[J]. J Dent (Tehran), 2015, 12(4): 281-289. |
17 | Cavalcanti AN, Pilecki P, Foxton RM, et al. Evaluation of the surface roughness and morphologic features of Y-TZP ceramics after different surface treatments[J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2009, 27(3): 473-479. |
18 | 杜桥, 牛光良. 硅锆浆料涂层对氧化锆陶瓷与树脂水门汀粘接强度的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2022, 57(9): 932-937. |
18 | Du Q, Niu GL. Effect of SiO2-ZrO2 slurry coating on shear bond strength of zirconia to resin cement[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2022, 57(9): 932-937. |
19 | 杜桥, 牛光良, 林红, 等. 硅锆浆料涂层对氧化锆陶瓷表面性能的影响[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2015, 50(11): 681-684. |
19 | Du Q, Niu GL, Lin H, et al. Effect of SiO2-ZrO2 slurry coating on surface performance of zirconia ceramic[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2015, 50(11): 681-684. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |