PDF(3705 KB)
不翻瓣种植术与翻瓣种植术对软组织影响的Meta分析
陈韵伊, 孙慈吉, 黎红
PDF(3705 KB)
PDF(3705 KB)
不翻瓣种植术与翻瓣种植术对软组织影响的Meta分析
), 孙慈吉1, 黎红1,2()Effects of flapless and flapped implantations on soft tissue: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
), Sun Ciji1, Li Hong1,2()目的 系统比较不翻瓣种植术与翻瓣种植术对种植体周围软组织产生的影响。 方法 检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Clinical Trails、OpenGrey、OpenDoar、Scopus、Ovid等9个数据库，纳入比较不翻瓣种植术与翻瓣种植术修复缺失牙的相关随机对照试验，检索时限为从2013年1月1日到2023 年8月27日，采用软件RevMan 5.3、Stata 14.0对符合纳入标准的研究进行Meta分析。 结果 共检得1 245篇文献，最终纳入17项研究。Meta分析结果表明：不翻瓣种植术可产生更好的种植体周围软组织愈合，种植体成功率［均数差（MD）=1.06，95%可信区间（CI）（1.02，1.10），P=0.004］、角化龈宽度变化［MD=0.10，95%CI（0.00，0.20），P=0.04］、探诊深度［MD=-0.60，95%CI（-0.67，-0.53），P<0.000 01］均优于翻瓣种植术，差异有统计学意义；改良牙菌斑指数［标准化均数差（SMD）=-0.41，95%CI（-0.81，0.00），P=0.05］、改良龈沟出血指数［SMD=-0.44，95%CI（-0.78，-0.10），P=0.01］最终合并结果显示优于翻瓣种植术；不翻瓣种植术龈乳头指数高于翻瓣种植术；两者间牙菌斑指数、牙龈指数变化的差异无统计学意义。 结论 与翻瓣种植术相比，不翻瓣种植术能实现更高的种植体成功率、更小的角化龈宽度变化、更小的探诊深度，不翻瓣种植术的改良牙菌斑指数、改良龈沟出血指数、龈乳头指数也存在优势。
Objective This study aimed to systematically compare the effects of flapless and flapped implantations on the surrounding soft tissues of dental implants. Methods Nine databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, OpenGrey, OpenDoar, Scopus, and Ovid, from January 1, 2013, to August 27, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing flapless implantation with flapped implantation for restoration of missing teeth were included. Meta-analysis was conducted on studies that met the inclusion criteria by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0. Results A total of 1 245 articles were retrieved, and 17 studies were ultimately included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that flapless implantation resulted in better healing of the soft tissues around the dental implants than flapped implantation. Moreover, flapless implantation showed superior changes in implant success rate [mean difference (MD)=1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.02, 1.10), P=0.004], the width of keratinized gingival changes [MD=0.10, 95%CI (0.00, 0.20), P=0.04], and probing depth [MD=-0.60, 95%CI (-0.67, -0.53), P<0.000 01], with statistically significant differences. The final combined results of modified plaque index [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-0.41, 95%CI (-0.81, 0.00), P=0.05] and modified sulcus bleeding index [SMD=-0.44, 95%CI (-0.78, -0.10), P=0.01] showed superiority over flapped implantation. The papillary presence index was higher in the flapless implantation group than in the flapped implantation group. No statistically significant differences were observed in plaque index and gingival indices changes between the two groups. Conclusion Flapless implantation can achieve higher implant success rate, smaller changes in the width of keratinized gingival, and smaller probing depths than flapped implantation. It also has advantages in terms of modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, and papillary presence index.
牙种植体 / 不翻瓣 / 翻瓣 / 软组织 / 影响 / Meta分析
dental implants / flapless / flapped / soft tissure / effects / Meta-analysis
R783.6
| 1 | Naeini EN, Atashkadeh M, De Bruyn H, et al. Narrati-ve review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and cli-nical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020, 22(4): 454-467. |
| 2 | Brodala N. Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(): 118-125. |
| 3 | Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M, et al. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006, 21(2): 298-304. |
| 4 | Tee YL. Minimally invasive surgical placements of nonsubmerged dental implants: a case series report, evaluation of the surgical technique and complications[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2011, 37(5): 579-587. |
| 5 | Mueller CK, Thorwarth M, Schultze-Mosgau S. Influence of insertion protocol and implant shoulder design on inflammatory infiltration and gene expression in peri-implant soft tissue during nonsubmerged dental implant healing[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 109(5): e11-e19. |
| 6 | Mueller CK, Thorwarth M, Schultze-Mosgau S. Histomorphometric and whole-genome expression analysis of peri-implant soft tissue healing: a comparison of flapless and open surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011, 26(4): 760-767. |
| 7 | You TM, Choi BH, Li J, et al. Morphogenesis of the pe-ri-implant mucosa: a comparison between flap and flapless procedures in the canine mandible[J]. Oral Surg O-ral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009, 107(1): 66-70. |
| 8 | Lin GH, Chan HL, Bashutski JD, et al. The effect of flapless surgery on implant survival and marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Periodontol, 2014, 85(5): e91-103. |
| 9 | Atieh MA, Alfardan L, Alsabeeha NHM. Flapped versus flapless alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 51(1): 133-142. |
| 10 | Lahoti K, Dandekar S, Gade J, et al. Comparative evaluation of crestal bone level by flapless and flap techni-ques for implant placement: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2021, 21(4): 328. |
| 11 | Zhuang JB, Zhao D, Wu YQ, et al. Evaluation of outcomes of dental implants inserted by flapless or flapped procedure: a meta-analysis[J]. Implant Dent, 2018, 27(5): 588-598. |
| 12 | Lee J, Lee JB, Koo KT, et al. Flap management in alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33(3): 613-621. |
| 13 | Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, et al. Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2014, 85(1): 14-23. |
| 14 | Bashutski JD, Wang HL, Rudek I, et al. Effect of flapless surgery on single-tooth implants in the esthetic zo-ne: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2013, 84(12): 1747-1754. |
| 15 | Froum SJ, Khouly I. Survival rates and bone and soft tissue level changes around one-piece dental implants pla-ced with a flapless or flap protocol: 8.5-year results[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017, 37(3): 327-337. |
| 16 | Garcia-Sanchez R, Mardas N, Buti J, et al. Immediate implant placement in fresh alveolar sockets with a minimal split-thickness envelope flap: a randomised control-led clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implant Res, 2021, 32(9): 1115-1126. |
| 17 | Jané-Salas E, Roselló-LLabrés X, Jané-Pallí E, et al. Open flap versus flapless placement of dental implants. A randomized controlled pilot trial[J]. Odontology, 2018, 106(3): 340-348. |
| 18 | Jiao G, Gao M. Clinical observation on the effect of minimally invasive flapless technique and implant prognosis in oral implants[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2018, 11(11): 12165-12172. |
| 19 | Singh N, Agrawal KK, Chand P, et al. Clinical outcomes of flap versus flapless immediately loaded single dental implants in the mandibular posterior region: one-year follow-up results from a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, 128(2): 167-173. |
| 20 | Siu TL, Dukka H, Saleh MHA, et al. Flap versus flapless alveolar ridge preservation: a clinical and histological single-blinded, randomized controlled trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2023, 94(2): 184-192. |
| 21 | Stoupel J, Lee CT, Glick J, et al. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the aesthetic zone using a flapless or a flap-involving approach: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2016, 43(12): 1171-1179. |
| 22 | Sunitha RV, Sapthagiri E. Flapless implant surgery: a 2-year follow-up study of 40 implants[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2013, 116(4): e237-e243. |
| 23 | Tsoukaki M, Kalpidis CDR, Sakellari D, et al. Clinical, radiographic, microbiological, and immunological outcomes of flapped vs. flapless dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implant Res, 2013, 24(9): 969-976. |
| 24 | Wang F, Huang W, Zhang Z, et al. Minimally invasive flapless vs. flapped approach for single implant placement: a 2-year randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(6): 757-764. |
| 25 | B?micke W, Gabbert O, Koob A, et al. Comparison of immediately loaded flapless-placed one-piece implants and flapped-placed conventionally loaded two-piece implants, both fitted with all-ceramic single crowns, in the posterior mandible: 3-year results from a randomised controlled pilot trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2017, 10(2): 179-195. |
| 26 | Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Marchetti M, et al. Computer-gui-ded versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2014, 7(3): 229-242. |
| 27 | Shamsan YA, Eldibany R, El Halawani GN, et al. Flapless versus conventional flap approch for dental implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone[J]. Alexandria Dent J, 2018, 43(2): 80-85. |
| 28 | 杨立, 陆卫青. 上颌前牙区2种即刻种植术对牙槽骨长度、软硬组织的影响及安全性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(3): 317-320. |
| 28 | Yang L, Lu WQ. The effect and safety of two techniques of immediate implants on alveolar bone length, soft and hard tissue in the anterior maxillary zone[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2017, 26(3): 317-320. |
| 29 | Curado TFF, Silva JR, Nascimento LN, et al. Implant survival/success and peri-implant outcomes of titanium-zirconium mini implants for mandibular overdentures: results from a 1-year randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implant Res, 2023, 34(8): 769-782. |
| 30 | Cai H, Liang X, Sun DY, et al. Long-term clinical performance of flapless implant surgery compared to the conventional approach with flap elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2020, 8(6): 1087-1103. |
| 31 | Pitman J, Christiaens V, Callens J, et al. Immediate implant placement with flap or flapless surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2023, 50(6): 755-764. |
| 32 | 刘道华. 上颌前牙区2种即刻种植术对牙槽骨长度、软硬组织的影响及手术的安全性分析[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2019, 6(24): 143, 152. |
| 32 | Liu DH. Analysis of the effects of 2 immediate implant procedures in the maxillary anterior region on alveolar bone length, hard and soft tissues, and the safety of the procedures[J]. Electr J General Dent, 2019, 6(24): 143, 152. |
| 33 | 宫苹. 口腔种植学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020. |
| 33 | Gong P. Oral implantology[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2020. |
| 34 | Esposito M, Maghaireh H, Grusovin MG, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, 2012(2): CD006697. |
| 35 | 雷文龙, 郭毅, 施斌. 非翻瓣法与翻瓣法在口腔种植手术治疗中疗效的Meta分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2015, 36(1): 159-164. |
| 35 | Lei WL, Guo Y, Shi B. Flapless versus flap: which technique is more effective for the dental implants? A Meta-analysis[J]. J Wuhan Univ (Med Ed), 2015, 36(1): 159-164. |
| 36 | 林泽明, 何炳蔚, 陈江, 等. 基于配准技术的微创牙种植导向模板的制作方法及应用[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(4): 402-406, 410. |
| 36 | Lin ZM, He BW, Chen J, et al. Manufacture method and clinical application of minimally invasive dental implant guide template based on registration technology[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2012, 30(4): 402-406, 410. |
| 37 | Ramanauskaite A, Schwarz F, Sader R. Influence of width of keratinized tissue on the prevalence of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implant Res, 2022, 33(S23): 8-31. |
| 38 | Gunpinar S, Meraci B, Karas M. Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020, 6(1): 19. |
| 39 | Grischke J, Karch A, Wenzlaff A, et al. Keratinized mucosa width is associated with severity of peri-implant mucositis. A cross-sectional study[J]. Clin Oral Implant Res, 2019, 30(5): 457-465. |
| 40 | 袁洁, 郭倩倩, 李麒, 等. 上颌前牙区牙周生物型特征间的相关性研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2020, 38(4): 398-403. |
| 40 | Yuan J, Guo QQ, Li Q, et al. Relationships among the periodontal biotype characteristics in the maxillary anterior[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2020, 38(4): 398-403. |
| 41 | Gao XM, Qin SY, Cai H, et al. Comparison of general and aesthetic effects between flapless and flap techniques in dental implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2021, 7(1): 100. |
| 42 | 封伟, 薛敏, 张士剑, 等. 前牙美学区不翻瓣种植与翻瓣种植对种植体周围组织的影响[J]. 中华医学美学美容杂志, 2016, 22(3): 165-168. |
| 42 | Feng W, Xue M, Zhang SJ, et al. Effeets of flapless versus flap implant surgery on tissues surrounding implants in esthetic zone[J]. Chin J Med Aesth Cosmet, 2016, 22(3): 165-168. |
| 43 | 余晓宁, 蔡洁琛, 陈小红. 翻瓣与不翻瓣种植手术疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(6): 370-377. |
| 43 | Yu XN, Cai JC, Chen XH. The effect of flap and flapless surgery on the outcomes of implant treatment: a Meta analysis[J]. Chin J Oral Med Res (Electr Ed), 2022, 16(6): 370-377. |
| 44 | 宿玉成. 种植外科中的软组织处理及其美学效果[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2006, 41(3): 148-150. |
| 44 | Su YC. Soft tissue management in implant surgery and its aesthetic effect[J]. Chin J Stomatol, 2006, 41(3): 148-150. |
| 45 | Tao BX, Feng Y, Fan XQ, et al. Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: an in vitro study[J]. J Dent, 2022, 123: 104170. |
| 46 | 岳嵚, 胡秀莲, 李健慧, 等. 不翻瓣与翻瓣种植技术对边缘骨水平的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(6): 997-1000. |
| 46 | Yue Q, Hu XL, Li JH, et al. Effects of non-flap and flap implant techniques on marginal bone levels[J]. J Peking Univ (Med Ed), 2013, 45(6): 997-1000. |
| 47 | 杨小东, 刘果生, 吴大怡. 不翻瓣植入牙种植体手术方式的优点与局限性[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2009,14(2): 42-43. |
| 47 | Yang XD, Liu GS, Wu DY. Advantages and limitations of flapless implant surgery[J]. Chin J Oral Implantol, 2009, 14(2): 42-43. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
AI Summary
