Analysis of supply-demand differences in management talent quality between universities and enterprises using AHP-Fuzzy evaluation

WANG Shuling, LI Sichen, DOU Lele, WU Jin

PDF(3047 KB)
PDF(3047 KB)
Researches in Higher Education of Pharmacy ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 120-131.

Analysis of supply-demand differences in management talent quality between universities and enterprises using AHP-Fuzzy evaluation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore the requirements for the quality of management talents, and provide suggestions for the cultivation of pharmaceutical management talents in universities from the perspective of supply and demand of universities and enterprises. Methods Based on the quality of managerial talents, a secondary indicator questionnaire was set up. Interviews and questionnaires were conducted online and offline with 50 college workers in related majors and 50 managers from pharmaceutical-related enterprises. The AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method was used to construct an evaluation system for managerial talents, calculate the weight of each indicator, and use the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to calculate the scores of managerial talent requirements with pharmaceutical management as an example, exploring the differences between the two. Results The weights of the four major qualities calculated by the AHP method are as follows: political and moral quality 47% and 36%; professional quality 23% and 24%; psychological quality 18% and 25% and physical quality 12% and 16% for colleges and enterprises respectively. The top three secondary indicators of universities and enterprises and their weights are: political belief 29.14%, 14.76%; practical ability 17.25%, 12.24%; academic morality 9.40%, 13.32%. From the perspective of colleges and universities, the fourth and fifth places are daily behavior and functional quality; from the perspective of enterprises, the fourth and fifth places are professional knowledge and stress tolerance. According to the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results, the scores of pharmaceutical management talents in universities and enterprises are 78.8 and 85.8 respectively. Conclusion There are differences between universities and enterprises in the evaluation of the quality of management talents. The transition of talents from colleges to enterprises is a continuous growth process. Universities should consider the needs of enterprises in the cultivation of management talents, combining practical, theoretical, and psychological qualities with the cultivation of political and moral quality to cultivate high-quality talents who not only have high moral conduct but also better meet the needs of enterprises.

Key words

dual perspectives of enterprises and universities; pharmaceutical management talents; AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

CLC number

C961

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Shuling, LI Sichen, DOU Lele, WU Jin.

Analysis of supply-demand differences in management talent quality between universities and enterprises using AHP-Fuzzy evaluation

. Researches in Higher Education of Pharmacy. 2024, 42(3): 120-131

References

[1] 余涛. 市场经济下企业工商管理人才培养模式探析[J]. 中国市场, 2021(33): 116-117.
[2] 张鲲. 高校工商管理人才培养的路径探析: 评辽宁大学出版社《地方高校工商管理专业应用型人才培养模式研究》[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2022(12): 206.
[3] 程国平. 管理学原理[M]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学出版社, 2015.
[4] 张道响, 王天骄, 顾芳菲. 1+X模式下铸造行业企业管理人才培养[J]. 铸造, 2022,71(11): 1472.
[5] 陈果. 基于创新型管理人才培养的管理学教学改革[J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 2022,5(11): 44-46,71.
[6] 王学俭, 李东坡, 李晓莉. 新时代高校思政课教学协同创新的内涵、重点与对策[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022,50(1): 87-97.
[7] 杨洪英, 陈国宝, 刘承军, 等. “双一流”高校国际化人才培养的逻辑依归、问题表征与应然路向[J]. 现代教育管理, 2023(3): 47-57.
[8] 苏君阳, 杨旖萱, 朴美景. 学科交叉融合背景下高校人才培养模式改革[J]. 北京教育(高教), 2023(1): 44-48.
[9] 聂军, 代彬, 吴霞. “国际化+数智化”背景下高校财务管理专业人才培养模式探究与实践[J]. 职业, 2022(20): 49-51.
[10] 姚鸟儿. 初创科技型企业融资能力评价指标体系构建研究: 基于模糊综合评价模型的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2020(12): 135-138,164.
[11] 王斌, 李刚, 曹勇, 等. 基于指标权重分配的群决策赋权方法研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018,27(11): 22-25.
[12] 宋永明, 朱洪利. 基于犹豫模糊偏好关系群决策的共识达成及其在信用风险评价中的应用[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2021,51(9): 46-58.
[13] 艾春安, 奉非东, 李剑, 等. 基于区间数判断矩阵与模糊聚类分析的主观群决策AHP方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2019,35(2): 39-43.
[14] 方奕舟, 陈志和, 熊育久. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的中山市水生态文明城市建设评估[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2021,60(3): 88-98.
[15] 张金福, 刘雪. 我国地方创新策源能力的模糊综合评价研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021,41(9): 8-14.
[16] 颜赛燕. 基于AHP-模糊数学综合评价的科技型中小企业融资效果研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2020,39(3): 75-81.
[17] 刘英华, 符向前. AHP-模糊综合评价法在泵站信息化评价工程中的应用[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2021(12): 235-238.
[18] 孙娜, 舒朋华, 刘青, 等. 线上线下相结合的“翻转式”教学模式在药事管理与法规课程中的应用[J]. 中国药事, 2021,35(7): 841-846.
[19] 王淑玲. 创业型药事管理人才培养模式研究[J]. 中国药事, 2014,28(10): 1079-1082.
[20] 薛原. 基于应用型人才培养的独立学院药事管理专业课程改革策略与探索[J]. 中国药物经济学, 2017,12(9): 152-153.
[21] 徐凤翔, 陈宇, 黄哲, 等. 药事管理专业教学质量评价的实证研究[J]. 沈阳药科大学学报, 2019,36(12): 1119-1126.
[22] 戴海斌, 林彬. 中国县域医共体药事管理与药学服务规范专家共识[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2021,38(17): 2049-2052.
[23] 杨勇, 田侃. 药事管理专业人才培养与执业药师职责发挥的一致性分析[J]. 中国药事, 2015,29(11): 1137-1140.
[24] 王群, 金钊, 黄颖, 等. 药事管理干预对基层医疗机构中药注射剂临床使用的影响[J]. 中国药房, 2021,32(12): 1526-1530.
[25] 陈健, 左秀然, 邓艾平. 医院药事管理信息化流程优化与实践[J]. 中国卫生信息管理杂志, 2021,18(5): 651-655.
[26] 刘耀铃, 李文强, 秦希佳, 等. 基于AHP-模糊综合的复杂装备性能指标评价与反馈方法[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2020,36(6): 8-14.

Comments

PDF(3047 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/