Efficacy and safety of the airway opening device with automatic position adjustment: an empirical study

Chen Hongmei, Sun Minyue, Luo Yan, Yang Xiangmei

PDF(1083 KB)
PDF(1083 KB)
Journal of Chongqing Medical University ›› 2025, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (04) : 530-535. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003758
Clinical research

Efficacy and safety of the airway opening device with automatic position adjustment: an empirical study

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of a new airway opening device with automatic position adjustment. Methods From January 4 to March 15,2021,the purposive sampling method was used to select 360 patients who underwent bronchoscopy examination or treatment. According to the random sequence generated by a computer,the research assistant adjusted the position angle(PA) as 90°(90° PA group),95°(95° PA group),and 100°(100° PA group),respectively,to open the airway of subjects,and the bronchoscope entered the airway to obtain the image of the best glottic view. All subjects were followed up immediately after study and at 0.5,1,3,6,12,and 24 hours after study to observe device-related adverse events. The primary outcome measure was the Cormack-Lehane(CL) grade for glottic exposure,and the secondary outcome measures were the incidence rate of adverse events and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) score. Results More than 80.0% of the subjects had CL grade I glottic exposure,and there was no significant difference in CL grade between the three PA groups(χ2 =1.942,P>0.05). The CL grade of some subjects was optimized at an angle of 100°. No device-related adverse events were reported,and the VAS score was 0. Conclusion The device can effectively and safely open the airway of subjects undergoing bronchoscopy at a PA of 90°-100°,and although it has no obvious advantage in improving glottic exposure at different levels of PA,it is recommended to select the PA of 100° to open the airway.

Key words

airway / airway management / medical device / bronchoscopy / glottic view

Cite this article

Download Citations
Chen Hongmei , Sun Minyue , Luo Yan , et al. Efficacy and safety of the airway opening device with automatic position adjustment: an empirical study. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2025, 50(04): 530-535 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003758

References

1
陈红梅,李冬梅,孙敏越,等. 气道打开体位自动调节装置的安全性应用研究[J]. 重庆医学202352(21):3239-3245.
Chen HM Li DM Sun MY,et al. Application study on safety of airway opening device with automatic position adjustment[J]. Chongqing Med202352(21):3239-3245.
2
陈红梅,罗 艳,吴俊,等. 气道打开体位自动调节装置的研制与初步应用[J]. 中国医疗设备202237(9):9-13,41.
Chen HM Luo Y Wu J,et al. Development and preliminary application of airway opening device with automatic position adjustment[J]. China Med Devices202237(9):9-13,41.
3
Cormack RS Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics[J]. Anaesthesia198439(11):1105-1111.
4
U.S. National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) Version 5 [EB/OL]. (2017-11-27). [2024-11-04].
5
Hjermstad MJ Fayers PM Haugen DF,et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales,verbal rating scales,and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults:a systematic literature review[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage201141(6):1073-1093.
6
Karcioglu O Topacoglu H Dikme O,et al. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults:which to use?[J]. Am J Emerg Med201836(4):707-714.
7
Howes BW Wharton NM Gibbison B,et al. LMA Supreme insertion by novices in manikins and patients[J]. Anaesthesia201065(4):343-347.
8
Schalk R Eichler K Bergold MN,et al. A radiographic comparison of human airway anatomy and airway manikins:implications for manikin-based testing of artificial airways[J]. Resuscitation201592:129-136.
9
Blackburn MB Wang SC Ross BE,et al. Anatomic accuracy of airway training manikins compared with humans[J]. Anaesthesia202176(3):366-372.
10
Schebesta K Hüpfl M Rössler B,et al. Degrees of reality:airway anatomy of high-fidelity human patient simulators and airway trainers[J]. Anesthesiology2012116(6):1204-1209.
11
de Luca A Sall FS Sailley R,et al. Reliability of manikin-based studies:an evaluation of manikin characteristics and their impact on measurements of ventilatory variables[J]. Anaesthesia201570(8):915-921.
12
Rai MR Popat MT. Evaluation of airway equipment:man or manikin?[J]. Anaesthesia201166(1):1-3.
13
El-Orbany MI Getachew YB Joseph NJ,et al. Head elevation improves laryngeal exposure with direct laryngoscopy[J]. J Clin Anesth201527(2):153-158.
14
Frerk C Mitchell VS McNarry AF,et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults[J]. Br J Anaesth2015115(6):827-848.
15
Brown EN Pavone KJ Naranjo M. Multimodal general anesthesia:theory and practice[J]. Anesth Analg2018127(5):1246-1258.
16
Oertel BG Lötsch J. Clinical pharmacology of analgesics assessed with human experimental pain models:bridging basic and clinical research[J]. Br J Pharmacol2013168(3):534-553.
17
Wu ZJ Yu JJ Lin QH,et al. Effects of an intraoperative intravenous bolus dose of dexmedetomidine on remifentanil-induced postinfusion hyperalgesia in patients undergoing thyroidectomy:a double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Anesth Analg2021132(2):320-328.
18
韩 锋,王 莹,田欣欣,等. 不同麻醉药物在支气管镜检查中的应用[J]. 临床荟萃202035(3):268-272.
Han F Wang Y Tian XX,et al. Application of different anesthetic drugs in bronchoscopy[J]. Clin Focus202035(3):268-272.

Comments

PDF(1083 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/