Clinical value of serum anti-centromere protein F antibody in breast cancer

Wang Yanping, Tang Dijiao, Nuerbiye Maimaitiyili, Zou Lin, Chen Pu

PDF(897 KB)
PDF(897 KB)
Journal of Chongqing Medical University ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (09) : 1188-1192. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003588
Clinical research

Clinical value of serum anti-centromere protein F antibody in breast cancer

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical value of serum anti-centromere protein F antibody(anti-CENPF) in breast cancer. Methods Serum samples were collected from 100 breast cancer patients(BC group),40 patients with benign breast disease(non-BC group),and 40 healthy controls(HC group). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the serum level of anti-CENPF,and chemiluminescence was used to measure the serum level of carbohydrate antigen 153(CA153). Results The BC group had a significantly higher serum level of anti-CENPF than the non-BC group and the HC group(P<0.05). The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve analysis showed that anti-CENPF and CA153 had an area under the ROC curve(AUC) of 0.714 and 0.672,respectively,in the diagnosis of breast cancer,and the combination of anti-CENPF and CA153 had an AUC of 0.739. There was a significant increase in the concentration of serum anti-CENPF in breast cancer patients with lymph node metastasis,distant metastasis,or negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER-2)(P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the serum level of anti-CENPF between breast cancer patients with different tumor sizes,clinical stages,and molecular types(P<0.05). Comparison between groups showed that patients with stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ breast cancer had a significantly higher serum level of anti-CENPF than those with stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ breast cancer,and patients with HER-2 overexpression or Luminal B type breast cancer had a significantly lower serum level of anti-CENPF than those with triple negative breast cancer. Among patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer,the HER-2 negative group had a significantly higher concentration of anti-CENPF than the HER-2 positive group(P=0.026). Conclusion Serum anti-CENPF plays an important role in the diagnosis,clinical staging,and molecular typing of breast cancer,and the level of anti-CENPF may be negatively correlated with the prognosis of breast cancer. Therefore,it is expected to become a potential disease marker for breast cancer.

Key words

anti-centromere protein F antibody / breast cancer / diagnosis / staging / prognosis

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wang Yanping , Tang Dijiao , Nuerbiye Maimaitiyili , et al . Clinical value of serum anti-centromere protein F antibody in breast cancer. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2024, 49(09): 1188-1192 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003588

References

1
Trapani D Ginsburg O Fadelu T,et al. Global challenges and policy solutions in breast cancer control[J]. Cancer Treat Rev2022104:102339.
2
张志锋,孙业富,沈预程. 血清TFF1检测在乳腺癌诊断及预后评估中的价值[J]. 中国免疫学杂志201935(13):1627-1630.
Zhang ZF Sun YF Shen YC. Value of serum TFF1 in diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer[J]. Chin J Immunol201935(13):1627-1630.
3
Seale KN Tkaczuk KHR. Circulating biomarkers in breast cancer[J]. Clin Breast Cancer202222(3):e319-e331.
4
邱晓阳,吴 璇,刘君,等. 外周血循环肿瘤细胞联合CA153检测在乳腺癌筛查及分期预测中的应用价值[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版)202049(3):331-337.
Qiu XY Wu X Liu J,et al. Application value of peripheral blood circulating tumor cells combined with CA153 detection in breast cancer screening and stage prediction[J]. Acta Med Univ Sci Technol Huazhong202049(3):331-337.
5
Zhang J Wang ZY Liu ZM,et al. CENPF promotes the proliferation of renal cell carcinoma in vitro [J]. Transl Androl Urol202312(2):320-329.
6
李宇阳,傅培铃,钟国栋,等. 着丝粒蛋白-F在胰腺导管腺癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版)202352(6):771-780.
Li YY Fu PL Zhong GD,et al. Expression and clinical significance of centromere protein-F in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J]. Acta Med Univ Sci Technol Huazhong202352(6):771-780.
7
Fritzler MJ Rattner JB Luft LM,et al. Historical perspectives on the discovery and elucidation of autoantibodies to centromere proteins(CENP) and the emerging importance of antibodies to CENP-F[J]. Autoimmun Rev201110(4):194-200.
8
Tan PH Ellis I Allison K,et al. The 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast[J]. Histopathology202077(2):181-185.
9
Zhu HL Doğan BE. American joint committee on cancer’s staging system for breast cancer,eighth edition:summary for clinicians[J]. Eur J Breast Health202117(3):234-238.
10
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志202131(10):954-1040.
Breast Cancer Expert Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association. Guidelines and norms for diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer of China Anti-Cancer Association(2021 edition)[J]. China Oncol202131(10):954-1040.
11
Goldhirsch A Wood WC Coates AS,et al. Strategies for subtypes:dealing with the diversity of breast cancer:highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011[J]. Ann Oncol201122(8):1736-1747.
12
Liang YR Zhang HW Song XJ,et al. Metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancer:Molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic targets[J]. Semin Cancer Biol202060:14-27.
13
Kim EJ Park HS Kim JY,et al. Assessment of the prognostic staging system of American joint committee on cancer 8th edition for breast cancer:comparisons with the conventional anatomic staging system[J]. J Breast Cancer202023(1):59-68.
14
刘荫华,周 斌,辛灵,等. 正确认识AJCC第8版乳腺癌预后分期的临床价值[J]. 国际外科学杂志201744(3):149-151.
Liu YH Zhou B Xin L,et al. Clinical value of correctly understanding the prognosis staging of AJCC 8th edition breast cancer[J]. Int J Surg201744(3):149-151.
15
Temian DC Pop LA Irimie AI,et al. The epigenetics of triple-negative and basal-like breast cancer:current knowledge[J]. J Breast Cancer201821(3):233-243.

Comments

PDF(897 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/