A retrospective analysis of the application value of chromosome karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis

Shen Mengjie, Chen Ke, Tong Keya, Chen Hongrui, Yang Songling, Zhang Xiaodong

PDF(766 KB)
PDF(766 KB)
Journal of Chongqing Medical University ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (09) : 1181-1187. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003573
Clinical research

A retrospective analysis of the application value of chromosome karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the application value of chromosome karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA) in prenatal diagnosis. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the karyotyping and CMA results of 1 575 amniotic fluid samples. Results The detection rates of abnormalities by karyotyping,CMA,and their combination were 5.84%,11.68%,and 13.65%,respectively. In the samples of normal karyotypes, for cases of sonographic structural anomalies,ultrasound soft markers,and normal structure on ultrasonography,the detection rates of pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variations were 3.03%,1.54%,and 1.10%,respectively. Conclusion Prenatal abnormality detection rate can be improved effectively by combining karyotyping and CMA,especially for cases of sonographic structural anomalies. The detection of chimerism should select appropriate technologies and samples. Special microstructural variations should be monitored for a long term.

Key words

chromosomal karyotyping / chromosomal microarray analysis / prenatal diagnosis / copy number variation

Cite this article

Download Citations
Shen Mengjie , Chen Ke , Tong Keya , et al . A retrospective analysis of the application value of chromosome karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2024, 49(09): 1181-1187 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003573

References

1
中华人民共和国卫生部. 中国出生缺陷防治报告 [S]. 2012.
Ministry of Health,People’s Republic of China. Report on prevention and treatment of birth defects [S]. 2012.
2
Evans MI Wapner RJ Berkowitz RL.Noninvasive prenatal screening or advanced diagnostic testing:caveat emptor[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol2016215(3):298-305.
3
Nevado J Mergener R Palomares-Bralo M,et al.New microdeletion and microduplication syndromes:a comprehensive review[J].Genet Mol Biol201437(1 Suppl):210-219.
4
Hillman SC McMullan DJ Hall G,et al.Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray:prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol201341(6):610-620.
5
中华医学会医学遗传学分会临床遗传学组,中国医师协会医学遗传医师分会遗传病产前诊断专业委员会,中华预防医学会出生缺陷预防与控制专业委员会遗传病防控学组. 低深度全基因组测序技术在产前诊断中的应用专家共识[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志201929(4):470-473.
Clinical Genetics Group,Medical Genetics Branch,Chinese Medical Association(CMA), Prenatal Diagnosis of Genetic Diseases Professional Committee,Medical Geneticists Branch,Chinese Medical Doctors Association(CMDA),Genetic Disease Prevention and Control Group,Birth Defect Prevention and Control Professional Committee,Chinese Preventive Medicine Association(CPMA). Expert consensus on the application of low-depth whole genome sequencing technology in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Chin J Med Genet201929(4):470-473.
6
Armour CM Dougan SD Brock JA,et al. Practice guideline:joint CCMG-SOGC recommendations for the use of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis and assessment of fetal loss in Canada[J].J Med Genet201855(4):215-221.
7
孟雁欣,于 湄,张静,等. 染色体核型联合微阵列分析应用于胎儿超声异常[J]. 实用医学杂志202036(5):667-671.
Meng YX Yu M Zhang J,et al. Application of chromosome karyotype combined with microarray analysis in fetal ultrasound abnormalities[J]. J Pract Med202036(5):667-671.
8
Wapner RJ Martin CL Levy B,et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med2012367(23):2175-2184.
9
中国医师协会医学遗传学分会,中国医师协会青春期医学专业委员会临床遗传学组,中华医学会儿科学会内分泌遗传代谢学组.染色体基因组芯片在儿科遗传病的临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志201654(6):410-413.
Medical Genetics Branch,Chinese Medical Doctors Association(CMDA),Clinical Genetics Group,Adolescent Medicine Professional Committee,Chinese Medical Doctors Association(CMDA),Endocrine Genetic Metabonomics Group,Paediatrics Society,Chinese Medical Association(CMA). Expert consensus on the clinical application of chromosome genome microarray in pediatric genetic diseases[J]. Chin J Pediatr201654(6):410-413.
10
Chen CP Su YN Hsu CY,et al. Mosaic deletion-duplication syndrome of chromosome 3:prenatal molecular cytogenetic diagnosis using cultured and uncultured amniocytes and association with fetoplacental discrepancy[J]. J Obstet Gynecol201150(4):485-491.
11
Lallar M Srivastava P Rai A,et al.Cytogenetic microarray in structurally normal and abnormal foetuses:a five year experience elucidating increasing acceptance and clinical utility[J]. J Genet201998:6.
12
Markus-Bustani K Yaron Y Goldstein M,et al. Undetected sex chromosome aneuploidy by chromosomal microarray[J]. Prenat Diagn201232(11):1117-1118.
13
Hao MZ Li LL Zhang H,et al. The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis[J]. J Clin Lab Anal202034(12):e23514.
14
陆国辉.产前遗传病诊断[M]. 广州:广东科技出版社,2002
Lu GH. Prenatal genetic disease diagnosis[M]. Guangzhou:Guangdong Science & Technology Press,2002
15
赵 珏,孙 娟,袁武锋,等. 羊水细胞染色体检测结果与产前诊断指征的关系研究[J].浙江医学201941(12):1273-1277,1282.
Zhao J Sun J Yuan WF,et al. Relationship between chromosomal test results and different prenatal diagnostic indications[J]. Zhejiang Med J201941(12):1273-1277,1282.
16
Callaway JLA Shaffer LG Chitty LS,et al. The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype:a review of the literature[J]. Prenat Diagn201333(12):1119-1123.
17
王淑娴,马京梅. 染色体微阵列分析技术的适宜产前诊断应用策略[J]. 中华围产医学杂志201922(1):26-29.
Wang SX Ma JM. Clinical pathway selection based on chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Chin J Perinat Med201922(1):26-29.
18
染色体微阵列分析技术在产前诊断中的应用协作组. 染色体微阵列分析技术在产前诊断中的应用专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志201449(8):570-572.
The application of chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis collaborative group. Expert consensus on the application of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol201449(8):570-572.
19
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No.581:the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol2013122(6):1374-1377.
20
Committee on Genetics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Committee opinion No.682:microarrays and next-generation sequencing technology:the use of advanced genetic diagnostic tools in obstetrics and gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol2016128(6):e262-e268.
21
Donnelly JC Platt LD Rebarber A,et al. Association of copy number variants with specific ultrasonographically detected fetal anomalies[J]. Obstet Gynecol2014124(1):83-90.
22
Hay SB Sahoo T Travis MK,et al. ACOG and SMFM guidelines for prenatal diagnosis:is karyotyping really sufficient?[J]. Prenat Diagn201838(3):184-189.
23
Zou ZY Huang LH Lin SB,et al. Prenatal diagnosis of posterior fossa anomalies:additional value of chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with cerebellar hypoplasia[J]. Prenat Diagn201838(2):91-98.
24
Lei T Feng JL Xie YJ,et al. Chromosomal aneuploidies and copy number variations in posterior fossa abnormalities diagnosed by prenatal ultrasonography[J]. Prenat Diagn201737(11):1160-1168.
25
de Wit MC Boekhorst F Mancini GM,et al. Advanced genomic testing may aid in counseling of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum on prenatal ultrasound[J]. Prenat Diagn201737(12):1191-1197.
26
Wu XQ An G Xie XR,et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis for pregnancies with or without ultrasound abnormalities in women of advanced maternal age[J]. J Clin Lab Anal202034(4):e23117.
27
Li DL Tekin M Buch M,et al. Co-existence of other copy number variations with 22q11.2 deletion or duplication:a modifier for variable phenotypes of the syndrome?[J]. Mol Cytogenet20125(1):18.
28
Matsuzaki J Berman JI Blaskey L,et al.Abnormal auditory mismatch fields in children and adolescents with 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication[J]. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging20205(10):942-950.
29
Weiss LA Shen YP Korn JM,et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism[J]. N Engl J Med2008358(7):667-675.

Comments

PDF(766 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/