
Efficacy and safety of a tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopy under local anesthesia in treatment of kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm
Chang Hai, Wang Linfeng, Zhang Gaojie, Peng Yueqiang, Luo Shengjun, Tang Wei
Efficacy and safety of a tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopy under local anesthesia in treatment of kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of a tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with a flexible ureteroscope under local anesthesia in the treatment of high-burden kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of the patients with kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm who underwent holmium laser lithotripsy by ureteral ureteroscopy under local anesthesia in Department of Urology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,from January to December 2023,and the patients were divided into flexible sheath group and conventional sheath group. General data were collected,and the two groups were compared in terms of perioperative indicators,postoperative complications,and surgical outcomes. Results A total of 96 patients were enrolled in this study,with 44 patients in the flexible sheath group and 52 patients in the conventional sheath group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the general data such as age,body mass index,and stone burden,and compared with the conventional sheath group,the flexible sheath group had a significantly higher postoperative stone clearance rate(72.73% vs. 46.15%,P<0.05),while the complication rates,such as fever(2.27%) and stone street formation(2.27%) were significantly lower than that of the traditional sheath group(23.08%/17.31%),P<0.05,There was no significant difference in the time of single operation between the flexible sheath group and the conventional sheath group(126.20±21.45 min vs. 116.71±27.39 min). Conclusion Tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopy under local anesthesia is safe and effective in the treatment of high-burden kidney stones with a diameter of ≥3 cm and thus holds promise for clinical application.
kidney stone / local anesthesia / tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath / flexible ureteroscopy
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
林奕伟,梁 慧,梁利健,等. 头端可弯曲负压输尿管鞘在大负荷肾结石(≥2 cm)输尿管软镜碎石取石术中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志,2023,38(6):433-436.
|
5 |
段传军,杨 瑞,赵红,等. 微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜在治疗2.0~4.0 cm肾结石中疗效与安全性比较[J]. 安徽医学,2024,45(2):203-206.
|
6 |
周文湖,陈道勋,卢东明,等. 经尿道可弯曲负压吸引鞘碎石取石治疗肾及输尿管上段结石的初步疗效[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2023,28(12):1028-1031.
|
7 |
王晨阳. 分期输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗直径3~4 cm肾结石的效果对比[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2023.
|
8 |
|
9 |
张明明,苏晓雨,刘 金. 输尿管镜手术治疗重复肾输尿管畸形合并输尿管结石21例临床分析[J]. 临床医学,2022,42(4):58-60.
|
10 |
黄闻彦. 一次性输尿管软镜及可重复使用输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效对比[D]. 广州:广州医科大学,2022.
|
11 |
林剑峰,叶志彬,涂建平,等. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘与常规鞘联合一次性输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的疗效比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2023,23(9):652-656.
|
12 |
吴小将,田文俊,郑达闻,等. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗直径2~3 cm上尿路结石的临床研究[J]. 中华全科医学,2023,21(9):1516-1519.
|
13 |
胡力仁,范先明,林剑锋,等. 可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜治疗2~3 cm上尿路结石[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2022,22(9):763-766.
|
14 |
伏 伟. 输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效比较分析[J]. 中华养生保健,2023,41(8):188-190.
|
15 |
伦晓璐,王永传,周海军,等. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗2~4 cm肾结石临床疗效观察[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志,2020,9(4):245-249.
|
16 |
丁 强,谢文华,何 屹. 40~80 Hz钬激光微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜手术治疗肾结石患者的疗效比较[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2024,29(1):65-68.
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
张慧铭,史 晶,徐虹,等. 杜非合剂联合利多卡因局部麻醉在输尿管软镜碎石取石的临床应用[J]. 基层医学论坛,2021,25(26):3743-3744.
|
20 |
王 宁,刘慧倩,唐永玺,等. 局麻输尿管软镜钬激光碎石取石术治疗高危上尿路结石患者疗效观察[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志,2022,37(8):620-625.
|
21 |
亓立成,楚 宁. 《2022 EAU指南:尿石症介入治疗的最佳实践》解读[J]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2022,14(4):31-36.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |