Clinical effect of 3D image registration combined with AI electromagnetic navigation in prostate biopsy

Chen Jiangchuan, Zhang Xuan, Li Changlong, Zhang Jiamo

PDF(3226 KB)
PDF(3226 KB)
Journal of Chongqing Medical University ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (06) : 694-700. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003521
Urinary system tumors

Clinical effect of 3D image registration combined with AI electromagnetic navigation in prostate biopsy

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of mpMRI-TRUS image fusion biopsy under transperineal 3D image registration combined with AI electromagnetic navigation. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 178 patients who underwent prostate biopsy in Yongchuan Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University from January 2022 to February 2024,and according to the puncture method,they were divided into transrectal cognitive group and transperineal AI group. The two puncture methods were compared in terms of the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) and complications,and the multivariate Cox analysis was used to determine the influencing factors for the detection rate of csPCa. Results A total of 94 patients underwent transperineal AI fusion biopsy,and 84 patients underwent transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy. Transperineal AI fusion biopsy was superior to transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy in identifying csPCa(67.0% vs. 53.5%,P=0.048). The multivariate regression analysis showed that age,PI-RADS score>3,and transperineal puncture were significant predictive factors of csPCa. Transperineal biopsy had a significantly higher urinary retention rate than with transrectal biopsy(18.5% vs. 4.7%,P=0.009). Conclusion AI-guided fusion biopsy has a better detection rate of csPCa than transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy,and in addition,transperineal biopsy has a relatively low risk of infectious complications.

Key words

prostate puncture / electromagnetic navigation / image registration / mpMRI-TRUS

Cite this article

Download Citations
Chen Jiangchuan , Zhang Xuan , Li Changlong , et al. Clinical effect of 3D image registration combined with AI electromagnetic navigation in prostate biopsy. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2024, 49(06): 694-700 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003521

References

1
傅 强,韩邦旻,刘振湘,等. 前列腺穿刺活检专家共识[J]. 中华男科学杂志202228(5):462-470.
Fu Q Han BM Liu ZX,et al. Expert consensus on prostate biopsy[J]. Natl J Androl202228(5):462-470.
2
中国抗癌协会泌尿男生殖系统肿瘤专业委员会前列腺癌学组. 前列腺癌筛查中国专家共识(2021年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志202131(5):435-440.
China expert consensus on prostate cancer screening(2021 edition)[J]. China Oncol202131(5):435-440.
3
Goldberg H Ahmad AE Chandrasekar T,et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound informed prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy Naïve men:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Urol2020203(6):1085-1093.
4
王林峰,罗生军,唐伟. 经直肠和经会阴前列腺穿刺对前列腺癌诊断价值的比较[J].重庆医科大学学报202348(8):921-925.
Wang LF Luo SJ Tang W. A comparison of the diagnostic value of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies for prostate cancer[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University202348(8):921-925.
5
Winoker JS Wajswol E Falagario U,et al. Transperineal versus transrectal targeted biopsy with use of electromagnetically-tracked MR/US fusion guidance platform for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer[J]. Urology2020146:278-286.
6
Bjurlin MA Carroll PR Eggener S,et al. Update of the standard operating procedure on the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis,staging and management of prostate cancer[J]. J Urol2020203(4):706-712.
7
Szabo RJ. “free-hand” transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia:review of the literature[J]. J Endourol202135(4):525-543.
8
中国医促会泌尿健康促进分会,中国研究型医院协会泌尿外科专业委员会. 超声引导下经直肠前列腺穿刺安全共识[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志201823(11):814-819.
Urological health promotion branch of china medical promotion association,Urology professional committee of china research hospital association. Safety consensus on ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate puncture [J]. J Mod Urol201823(11):814-819.
9
Rosenkrantz AB Verma S Choyke P,et al. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in patients with a prior negative biopsy:a consensus statement by AUA and SAR[J]. J Urol2016196(6):1613-1618.
10
Pepe P Garufi A Priolo GD,et al. Multiparametric MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy:advantages of a transperineal approach[J]. Anticancer Res201737(6):3291-3294.
11
Siddiqui MM Rais-Bahrami S Turkbey B,et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer[J]. JAMA2015313(4):390-397.
12
Baco E Rud E Eri LM,et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess and compare the outcomes of two-core prostate biopsy guided by fused magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images and traditional 12-core systematic biopsy[J]. Eur Urol201669(1):149-156.
13
Tu X Liu ZH Chang TC,et al. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may perform better than transrectal route in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer:systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer201917(5):e860-e870.
14
Amsellem-Ouazana D Younes P Conquy S,et al. Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer. Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging(MRSI) a useful tool?A preliminary study[J]. Eur Urol200547(5):582-586.
15
Kasivisvanathan V Rannikko AS Borghi M,et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med2018378(19):1767-1777.
16
Arsov C Rabenalt R Blondin D,et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies[J]. Eur Urol201568(4):713-720.
17
Fletcher P De Santis M Ippoliti S,et al. Vector prostate biopsy:a novel magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound image fusion transperineal biopsy technique using electromagnetic needle tracking under local anaesthesia[J]. Eur Urol202383(3):249-256.
18
Lee SH Chung MS Kim JH,et al. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in men with previously negative prostate biopsy results[J]. J Endourol201226(7):787-791.
19
Mottet N van den Bergh RCN Briers E,et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. part 1:screening,diagnosis,and local treatment with curative intent[J]. Eur Urol202179(2):243-262.

Comments

PDF(3226 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/