Risk factors for adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an analysis based on a random forest survival model

Zhu Xiang, Yu Shun, Liu Xingyu, Wang Shengnan, Wu Lei

PDF(1826 KB)
PDF(1826 KB)
Journal of Chongqing Medical University ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (03) : 295-302. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003455
Clinical research

Risk factors for adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an analysis based on a random forest survival model

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To comprehensively analyze the influencing factors for the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),to construct a prediction model and a prognosis scoring system,and to provide a reference for individualized vascular treatment in clinical practice. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for all AMI patients who underwent PCI in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2018 to June 2022,with the follow-up outcome of the onset of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) for the first time after surgery. The ten-fold cross-validated lasso regression analysis was used to determine the variables to be included in the model,and a random survival forest(RSF) model and a Cox proportional hazards model were constructed. The area under the ROC curve(AUC) and calibration curves were used to evaluate the performance of the model,and a risk calculator was developed according to the fitting results of RSF model. Results A total of 3 880 patients with AMI were finally included in the study,among whom 473(12.2%) experienced MACE within one year after surgery. Lasso regression obtained 15 variables including sex,type of AMI,and hypertension,and the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes,low left ventricular ejection fraction(30%~40%),and degree of vascular stenosis were the risk factors for postoperative MACE. In the validation set,the RSF and Cox models had an AUC of 0.774(95%CI=0.761~0.787) and 0.597(95%CI=0.581~0.613),respectively. The calibration curves showed that the model had a relatively high accuracy in predicting the risk of MACE within one year,and RSF score with the optimal cut-off value of 133 could also accurately distinguish the cumulative risk of MACE(P<0.001). Conclusion The RSF model and the scoring system constructed based on the above factors can effectively predict the risk of postoperative MACE and perform risk stratification,thereby helping cardiovascular physicians to formulate individualized treatment regimens in clinical practice.

Key words

acute myocardial infarction / major adverse cardiovascular events / random survival forest / Cox regression / prognostic score

Cite this article

Download Citations
Zhu Xiang , Yu Shun , Liu Xingyu , et al . Risk factors for adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an analysis based on a random forest survival model. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2024, 49(03): 295-302 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.003455

References

1
Song JL Murugiah K Hu S,et al. Incidence,predictors,and prognostic impact of recurrent acute myocardial infarction in China[J]. Heart2020107(4):313-318.
2
You JY Gao LM Shen YL,et al. Predictors and long-term prognosis of left ventricular aneurysm in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era[J]. J Thorac Dis202113(3):1706-1716.
3
Madhavan MV Stone GW. Adverse events beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Curr Opin Cardiol202035(6):687-696.
4
Madhavan MV Kirtane AJ Redfors B,et al. Stent-related adverse events >1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol202075(6):590-604.
5
Copeland-Halperin RS Baber U Aquino M,et al. Prevalence,correlates,and impact of coronary calcification on adverse events following PCI with newer-generation DES:findings from a large multiethnic registry[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv201891(5):859-866.
6
Riley RD Snell KI Ensor J,et al. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model:part II - binary and time-to-event outcomes[J]. Stat Med201938(7):1276-1296.
7
Jespersen L Hvelplund A Abildstrøm SZ,et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events[J]. Eur Heart J201233(6):734-744.
8
van Buuren S Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice:multivariate imputation by chained equations inR [J]. J Stat Soft201145(3):1-67.
9
Xie CY Du R Ho JW,et al. Effect of machine learning re-sampling techniques for imbalanced datasets in 18F-FDG PET-based radiomics model on prognostication performance in cohorts of head and neck cancer patients[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging202047(12):2826-2835.
10
Ramsay IS Ma SS Fisher M,et al. Model selection and prediction of outcomes in recent onset schizophrenia patients who undergo cognitive training[J]. Schizophr Res Cogn201711:1-5.
11
Taylor JMG. Random survival forests[J]. J Thorac Oncol20116(12):1974-1975.
12
Kong FY Xiang L Wu YN,et al. Evaluation of the prognostic role of the wall motion score index and the SYNTAX score II in patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention by evaluation of major adverse cardiovascular events at 12-month follow-up[J]. Med Sci Monit202127:e932652.
13
Lee HH Lee H Cho SMJ,et al. On-treatment blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in adults with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol202178(15):1485-1495.
14
Cahn A Wiviott SD Mosenzon O,et al. Association of baseline HbA1c with cardiovascular and renal outcomes:analyses from DECLARE-TIMI 58[J]. Diabetes Care202245(4):938-946.
15
McGregor DE Palarea-Albaladejo J Dall PM,et al. Cox regression survival analysis with compositional covariates:application to modelling mortality risk from 24-h physical activity patterns[J]. Stat Methods Med Res202029(5):1447-1465.
16
李 瑞,刘墨麒,黎佳璐,等. 心脑血管系统的影像评估对主要心血管不良事件的预测作用[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志202219(3):154-160.
Li R Liu MQ Li JL,et al. Predictive value of imaging assessment on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems for major adverse cardiovascular events[J]. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis202219(3):154-160.
17
张 鑫,丁 莹,姚毅仁,等. 早发急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后风险列线图模型的构建与验证[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)202242(11):1539-1546,1552.
Zhang X Ding Y Yao YR,et al. Establishment and validation of prognostic risk nomogram model among patients with premature ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. J Nanjing Med Univ Nat Sci202242(11):1539-1546,1552.
18
Disease Kidney :Improving Global Outcomes(KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of glomerular diseases[J]. Kidney Int2021100(4S):S1-S276.
19
赵圣吉,刘超权,郑伟民. eGFR对行直接PCI治疗的急性心肌梗死患者预后的影响[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志201810(12):1534-1536,1539.
Zhao SJ Liu CQ Zheng WM. Influence of estimated glomerular filtration rate on prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Chin J Evid Based Cardiovasc Med201810(12):1534-1536,1539.
20
Perkins BA Bebu I Gao XY,et al. Early trajectory of estimated glomerular filtration rate and long-term advanced kidney and cardiovascular complications in type 1 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care202245(3):585-593.
21
Steubl D Schneider MP Meiselbach H,et al. Association of serum uromodulin with death,cardiovascular events,and kidney failure in CKD[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol202015(5):616-624.
22
Sasso FC Pafundi PC Simeon V,et al. Efficacy and durability of multifactorial intervention on mortality and MACEs:a randomized clinical trial in type-2 diabetic kidney disease[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol202120(1):145.
23
McCallum W Tighiouart H Testani JM,et al. Acute kidney function declines in the context of decongestion in acute decompensated heart failure[J]. JACC Heart Fail20208(7):537-547.
24
张亚茹,薛政凯,缪 帅,等. 支架数目对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相关的围术期心肌梗死的影响[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志202022(8):828-831.
Zhang YR Xue ZK Miao S,et al. Effect of implanted stents on PCI-related periprocedural myocardial infarction[J]. Chin J Geriatr Heart Brain Vessel Dis202022(8):828-831.
25
张海华,俞梦越. 青年非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床特点分析[J]. 中国循环杂志202237(9):914-919.
Zhang HH Yu MY. Clinical characteristics of young patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Chin Circ J202237(9):914-919.

Comments

PDF(1826 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/