
Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic surgery through three different approaches in the treatment of thyroid microcarcinoma
Liu Sanbao, Wang Yabing, Ren Junling
Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic surgery through three different approaches in the treatment of thyroid microcarcinoma
Objective To investigate the efficacy and complications of endoscopic surgery through three different approaches in the treatment of thyroid microcarcinoma. Methods We retrospectively included 240 patients with thyroid microcarcinoma who had undergone endoscopic surgery in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College from January 2020 to March 2023. According to surgical approaches,the patients were divided into transoral vestibular approach group(n=71),transaxillary approach group(n=73), and breast approach group(n=96). The three groups were comparted in terms of general clinical data, perioperative indicators,postoperative pain,incision aesthetics,patients’ degree of satisfaction, and postoperative complications. Results The operation time of the transaxillary group was significantly shorter than that of the other two groups(P<0.001). The length of incision was significantly different between the three groups: the transoral group < the breast group < the transaxillary group(P<0.001). The transoral group had a significantly greater number of dissected central lymph nodes and a significantly shorter dissection time compared with the other two groups(P<0.001). The visual analogue scale score was significantly lower in the transoral and transaxillary groups than in the breast group at 6 h,12 h,24 h,and 48 h after operation(P<0.001). The transoral group and the transaxillary group were significantly superior to the breast group in incision aesthetics and patients’ degree of satisfaction(P<0.001). The overall incidence of complications showed no significant difference between the three groups(P=0.491). Conclusion Endoscopic surgery through the three approaches were equivalently effective in the treatment of thyroid microcarcinoma, with no difference in complications. However,the transaxillary approach showed the shortest operation time, and the transoral vestibular approach was superior in central lymph node dissection, dissection time, and incision aesthetics while ensuring the effectiveness. Surgical approach selection should be based on patient’s actual condition.
thyroid microcarcinoma / endoscopic surgery / transoral vestibular approach / transaxillary approach / breast approach / clinical efficacy / prognosis
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
单宏杰,谢 芳,杨园园,等. 腔镜辅助老年甲状腺微小癌手术应用效果及安全性[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2020,40(8):1613-1615.
|
4 |
|
5 |
章德广,何高飞,高 力,等. 无充气颏下前庭联合入路腔镜甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌41例临床分析[J]. 中华外科杂志,2022,60(2):154-158.
|
6 |
李景铧,张 帆,张毅,等. 全腔镜与开放手术治疗cT1N0甲状腺乳头状癌的临床对比研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报,2019,41(15):1461-1467.
|
7 |
中国抗癌协会甲状腺癌专业委员会(CATO). 甲状腺微小乳头状癌诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2016版)[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2016,43(12):526.
Chinese Association of Thyroid Oncology(CATO). China expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of thyroid micropapillary carcinoma(2016 edition)[J]. Chin J Clin Oncol,2016,43(12):526.
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
朱英梅,高 山,张亚坤,等. 胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统手术的临床效果比较[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2021,27(2):1-7.
|
12 |
李小磊,贺青卿,庄大勇,等. 双侧腋窝乳晕入路机器人甲状腺手术单中心1 000例报告[J]. 中华外科杂志,2021,59(11):918-922.
|
13 |
王艺超,游 薇,赵婉君,等. 经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的研究进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2020,27(2):221-225.
|
14 |
李志宏,檀谊洪,梁伟新. 经口腔前庭入路与经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺微小乳头状癌手术的疗效及安全性对比研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志,2021,26(2):209-213.
|
15 |
许志亮,史曼曼,廖仕翀,等. 两种常用腔镜技术在甲状腺微小乳头状癌中央组淋巴结清扫中的运用[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版),2019,40(4):613-616.
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
周雨秋,李 超,蔡永聪,等. 无充气经腋完全腔镜下胸锁乳突肌后缘与胸锁乳突肌间隙入路治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的比较[J]. 中华外科杂志,2021,59(8):686-690.
|
19 |
刘招娣,李昱均,俞 星,等. 经口腔前庭和全乳晕入路腔镜手术与开放手术对T1b期甲状腺乳头状癌治疗效果的对比研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2020,55(10):905-912.
|
20 |
|
21 |
薛军军,郭宏义,宁亚文,等. 术中神经监测技术在甲状腺手术中的临床应用[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2020,30(3):81-86.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |