
Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy in patients with different levels of body mass index
Zhu Mengqiu, Yi Qianlin, Wu Jialin, Chen Wanli, Xiao Lin
Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy in patients with different levels of body mass index
Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy versus traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy in patients with different levels of body mass index. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the case data of 416 patients who received robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy and 725 patients who received traditional laparoscopic total hysterectomy in The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from February 2016 to April 2021. The patients were stratified according to the different levels of body mass index(non-overweight,overweight,and obese),and the two groups and the subgroups based on body mass index were compared in terms of perioperative conditions and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results The overweight subgroup in the robot-assisted laparoscopic group had a significantly shorter time of operation than that in the traditional laparoscopic group[(125.37±50.92) min vs. (135.68±44.55) min,P<0.05],and all three subgroups in the robot-assisted laparoscopic group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss than those in the traditional laparoscopic group[non-overweight:(60.46±45.20) mL vs. (92.88±105.13) mL,P<0.05;overweight:(72.01±62.03) mL vs. (115.02±123.38) mL,P<0.05; obese:(65.59±37.92) mL vs. (125.16±96.07) mL,P<0.05]. The overweight and obese subgroups in the robot-assisted laparoscopic group had a significantly shorter time to first flatus than those in the traditional laparoscopic group[overweight:(2.04±0.83) d vs. (2.19±0.63) d,P<0.05;obese:(1.97±0.54) vs. (2.19±0.54) d,P<0.05]. All three subgroups in the robot-assisted laparoscopic group had a lower overall incidence rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications than those in the traditional laparoscopic group,but with no statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusion As for total hysterectomy in overweight and obese patients,robot-assisted laparoscopy has certain advantages over traditional laparoscopy in reducing perioperative complications.
robot-assisted laparoscopy / traditional laparoscopy / total hysterectomy / body mass index / perioperative conditions
1 |
黎金婷,芦恩婷,田东立,等. 体质量指数对机器人辅助腹腔镜全子宫切除术的影响[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2022,3(1):42-47.
|
2 |
王海波,李苓妙,胡晓丽,等. 肥胖妇女腹腔镜全子宫切除术并发症比较与风险评估[J]. 解放军医药杂志,2019,31(8):66-69.
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
黄聂笑,肖 琳,马丹,等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下盆腔淋巴结清扫与传统腹腔镜下盆腔淋巴结清扫的对比研究[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2020,1(2):77-85.
|
7 |
马金香,张文娟,黄婷婷. 机器人辅助腹腔镜对比传统腹腔镜关于全子宫切除术的Meta分析[J]. 医学理论与实践,2020,33(16):2613-2617.
|
8 |
李津津,欧阳熙坪,龚 雪,等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜宫颈癌手术的临床对比研究[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2020,1(3):166-173.
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |