Improvement in bone age assessment efficiency of physicians based on the artificial intelligence-assisted bone age assessment system

Wu Peng, Liu Xinding, Zhao Deli, Jin Cuicui, Sun Rui

PDF(2086 KB)
PDF(2086 KB)
Journal of Chongqing Medical University ›› 2024, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (01) : 60-64. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.
Clinical research

Improvement in bone age assessment efficiency of physicians based on the artificial intelligence-assisted bone age assessment system

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To compare the bone age assessment efficiency of radiologists for children by left hand radiography before and after the implementation of the artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted bone age assessment system. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of left hand X-ray plain films of 300 children treated in our hospital. The China-05 standards were used to assess bone age. The bone age development grade of each bone in the left hand was assessed by two junior physicians(physician 1 and physician 2,experimental group) with and without the assistance of the AI system,and the time was recorded. The accuracy,root mean square error(RMSE),and time of bone age assessment were calculated with the mean values of assessment results of two senior radiologists(control group) with and without the assistance of the AI system as the reference standards. Results Without the assistance of the AI system,the diagnostic accuracy rates of physician 1 and physician 2 were 77.3%/83% and 88.7%/93.7% at month 6 and month 12,respectively,and the RMSE values were 9 and 8,respectively. With the assistance of the AI system,the diagnostic accuracy rates of physician 1 and physician 2 were 88.7%/90.3% and 97%/97.3% at month 6 and month 12,respectively,and the RMSE values were 6 and 6,respectively,showing significant differences. Without the assistance of the AI system,the mean assessment time of physicians in the experimental and control groups was 124.79 s and 89.13 s,respectively. With the assistance of the AI system,the mean assessment time of physicians in the experimental and control groups was 86.10 s and 63.87 s,respectively. By utilizing AI,the mean assessment time was significantly reduced(P<0.001). Conclusion The AI-assisted bone age assessment system can significantly improve physicians’ work efficiency and reduce the film reading time.

Key words

imaging diagnosis / bone age assessment / artificial intelligence

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wu Peng , Liu Xinding , Zhao Deli , et al . Improvement in bone age assessment efficiency of physicians based on the artificial intelligence-assisted bone age assessment system. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2024, 49(01): 60-64 https://doi.org/10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.

References

1
何晓芬,唐桂波,李国峰,等. 青海省西宁市青少年腕部骨龄评价[J]. 实用放射学杂志201127(9):1396-1398.
He XF Tang GB Li GF,et al. Investigation of wrist bone age of adolescent in Xining area of Qinghai Province[J]. J Pract Radiol201127(9):1396-1398.
2
Wicks EC Menezes LJ Barnes A,et al. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of simultaneous hybrid 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging201819(7):757-767.
3
Kagioka Y Yasuda M Okune M,et al. Right ventricular involvement is an important prognostic factor and risk stratification tool in suspected cardiac sarcoidosis:analysis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Clin Res Cardiol2020109(8):988-998.
4
Tajmir SH Lee H Shailam R,et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted interpretation of bone age radiographs improves accuracy and decreases variability[J]. Skeletal Radiol201948(2):275-283.
5
Berst MJ Dolan L Bogdanowicz MM,et al. Effect of knowledge of chronologic age on the variability of pediatric bone age determined using the Greulich and Pyle standards[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol2001176(2):507-510.
6
国家卫生健康委员会2019年1月25日例行新闻发布会文字实录[EB/OL].[2019-01-25].
Transcript of the regular press conference of the National Health Commission on January 25,2019[EB/OL].[2019-01-25].
7
张鹏飞,李 辉. 三种骨龄评价方法在3~17岁儿童临床应用中的一致性比较研究[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志201712(4):263-267.
Zhang PF Li H. Comparison of the consistency of three skeletal age methods in 3 to 17 years old children[J]. Chin J Evid Based Pediatr201712(4):263-267.
8
Chen L Zhang H, Xiao J,et al .SCA-CNN:Spatial and channel-wise attention in convolutional networks forimage captioning[EB/OL].[2017-11-19].
9
Spampinato C Palazzo S Giordano D,et al. Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images[J]. Med Image Anal201736:41-51.
10
Spampinato C Palazzo S Giordano D,et al. Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images[J]. Med Image Anal201736:41-51.
11
Kim JR Shim WH Yoon HM,et al. Computerized bone age estimation using deep learning based program:evaluation of the accuracy and efficiency[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol2017209(6):1374-1380.
12
Lee H Tajmir S Lee J,et al. Fully automated deep learning system for bone age assessment[J]. J Digit Imaging201730(4):427-441.
13
Wang FD Gu X Chen S,et al. Artificial intelligence system can achieve comparable results to experts for bone age assessment of Chinese children with abnormal growth and development[J]. PeerJ20208:e8854.

Comments

PDF(2086 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/