Effects of biological additives on the quality of silage and the health of livestock

CHENG Chen, ZHANG Xiaohui, ZHOU Aimin, ZHANG Yu

PDF(594 KB)
PDF(594 KB)
Animals Breeding and Feed ›› 2024, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (09) : 29-34. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.cn42-1648/s.2024.09.007

Effects of biological additives on the quality of silage and the health of livestock

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objectives The theoretical basis and practical reference were provided to improve the efficiency of silage and prepare silage feed with high-quality, high-yield, and safety. Methods The types and application effects of biological additives in the process of silage were summarized by reviewing the literature related. The effects of silage additives on improving the quality of silage feed and the health of livestock were analyzed. The direction of developing biological additives in silage was prospected. Results Biological additives in silage can promote the proliferation of beneficial microorganisms such as lactic acid bacteria, prolong the storage time of silage feed, improve the efficiency of silage and the intake of livestock, and alleviate the shortage of feed in spring and winter in China. Conclusions Reasonable utilization of biological additives in silage can improve the quality of silage feed, promote the healthy growth of livestock, and play an important role in enhancing the production efficiency and economic benefits of animal husbandry.

Key words

microorganisms / additives / the quality of silage / the health of livestock

CLC number

S816.53

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHENG Chen , ZHANG Xiaohui , ZHOU Aimin , et al. Effects of biological additives on the quality of silage and the health of livestock. Animals Breeding and Feed. 2024, 23(09): 29-34 https://doi.org/10.13300/j.cnki.cn42-1648/s.2024.09.007

References

1
杨楠, 邹苏燕, 戚如鑫, 等. 青贮微生物制剂及优良青贮菌种筛选的研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020, 32(2):578-85.
2
任付平. 复合微生物菌剂在全株玉米青贮中的应用与研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2007.
3
杜美妤. 不同TMR日粮对育肥羊生产性能、胃肠道微生物组及代谢组的影响研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2021.
4
李旭业, 徐艳霞, 董扬, 等. 青贮添加剂种类及其对青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 现代畜牧科技, 2016(1):32-33.
5
张增欣, 邵涛. 青贮添加剂研究进展[J]. 草业科学, 2006,23(9):56-63.
6
何进, 徐思杨, 刘波, 等. 乳酸菌在农业和食品加工中的应用研究进展[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2022,42(4): 1-11.
7
郭旭生, 丁武蓉, 玉柱. 青贮饲料发酵品质评定体系及其新进展[J]. 中国草地学报, 2008,30(4):7-8.
8
CARVALHO B F, SALES G F, SCHWAN R F, et al. Criteria for lactic acid bacteria screening to enhance silage quality [J]. J applied Microbiol, 2021,130(2):341-355.
9
崔卫东, 龙宣杞, 杨文琦, 等. 乳酸菌对青贮饲料发酵品质影响的研究进展[J]. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(19):155-158.
10
KIM D, LEE K D, CHOI K C. Role of LAB in silage fermentation: effect on nutritional quality and organic acid production:an overview [J]. Aims agriculture and food, 2021, 6(1): 216-234.
11
萨初拉, 苏少锋, 吴青海, 等. 微生物青贮添加剂研究进展[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2020, 41(1):48-55.
12
李献华, 王许刚, 高晶萍, 等. 乳酸菌的生物学功能及其在家禽养殖生产中应用的研究进展[J]. 饲料研究, 2022,45(14):121-124.
13
王芳芳, 刁华杰, 夏九龙, 等. 乳酸菌及其发酵饲料在动物生产中的应用[J]. 饲料研究, 2016 (1): 15-19.
14
王亮亮, 李胜利, 刘文奇, 等. 青贮添加剂对全株玉米青贮发酵效果和奶牛生产性能的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志2011,47(7):69-73.
15
李旭华, 刘海林. 不同处理稻草混合青贮料对奶牛生产性能的影响[J]. 饲料广角, 2006(21):43-44.
16
侯美玲, 杜珠梅, 范文强, 等. 乳酸菌与纤维素酶对草甸草原天然牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2017, 48(5):871-880.
17
郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香, 等. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021,29(5):1113-1117.
18
寇江涛, 程钰, 张海波, 等. 不同酶制剂对水稻秸秆和白酒糟混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2):396-401.
19
丁健, 贾亚红, 陈小莲, 等. 纤维素酶对玉米青贮饲料糖和有机酸生成量的影响[J]. 饲料工业2002, 23(9):10-11.
20
JIN L, DUNIERE L, LYNCH J P, et al. Impact of ferulic acid esterase producing lactobacilli and fibrolytic enzymes on conservation characteristics, aerobic stability and fiber degradability of barley silage [J]. Anim feed Sci Tech, 2015,207:62-74.
21
邹长连. 酶制剂及其添加水平对稻草青贮品质的影响[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2012.
22
黄秀文, 范雪, 唐明欢, 等. 青贮添加剂对牧草青贮品质影响的研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2023, 44(17):18-22.
23
周昕, 黄秋连, 王健, 等. 添加乳酸菌剂和糖蜜对不同含水量食叶草青贮发酵品质及体外干物质消失率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021,33(3):1594-1606.
24
王天威, 曹艳红, 杨果, 等. 乳酸菌对青贮品质及草食家畜健康的影响[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2020, 50(9):927-938.
25
孙展英, 高健, 郭孟娇, 等. 生物发酵农作物秸秆及其在反刍动物饲料中的应用[J]. 饲料工业, 2024, 45(1):10-16,33.
26
刘朝干, 贺建华, 张佩华. 整株玉米不同成熟阶段对其青贮品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2007(1):41-43.
27
许冬梅. 不同气候区及乳酸菌影响玉米青贮发酵的微生物组与代谢组学机制研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
28
刘辉, 卜登攀, 吕中旺, 等. 乳酸菌和化学保存剂对窖贮紫花苜蓿青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2015,46(5):784-791.
29
CHIQUETTE J, TALBOT G H, MARKWELL F A, et al. Repeated ruminal dosing of Ruminococcus flavefaciens NJ along with a probiotic mixture in forage or concentrate-fed dairy cows: effect on ruminal fermentation, cellulolytic populations and in sacco digestibility[J]. Can J Anim Sci, 2007, 87(2): 237-249.
30
MUCK R E, NADEAU E M G, MCALLISTER T A, et al. Silage review: recent advances and future uses of silage additives[J]. J dairy Sci, 2018,101(5):3980-4000.
31
王旭哲, 张凡凡, 马春晖, 等. 同/异型乳酸菌对青贮玉米开窖后品质及微生物的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018,34(10):296-304.
32
任海伟, 孙一帆, 任雨薇, 等. 基于文献计量的青贮添加剂研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2022,38(8):261-274.
33
白史且, 李平. 中国南方牧草青贮进展[J]. 草学, 2017(S1):5-17,22.
34
HOU M, GENTU G, LIU T, et al. Silage preparation and fermentation quality of natural grasses treated with lactic acid bacteria and cellulase in meadow steppe and typical steppe [J]. Asian Austral J Anim, 2017, 30(6): 788-796.
35
LIN C, BOLSEN K K, BRENT B E, et al. Epiphytic microflora on alfalfa and whole-plant corn [J]. J Dairy Sci, 1992,75(9): 2484-2493.
36
苏海鸣, 王晓春, 马晓霞, 等. 添加复合菌酶对芦苇青贮品质的影响[J]. 现代畜牧科技, 2023(9): 16-18.
37
辛鹏程, 原现军, 郭刚, 等. 添加丙酸对青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015,23(3):594-600.
38
LARA E C, BASSO F C, ASSIS F B, et al. Changes in the nutritive value and aerobic stability of corn silages inoculated with Bacillus subtilis alone or combined with Lactobacillus plantarum [J]. Anim Prod Sci, 2015, 56(11):1867-1874.
39
张俊丽, 岳彩娟, 李明, 等. 不同处理方式对红花秸秆发酵品质与营养价值的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(12):99-104.
40
黄秀文, 范雪, 唐明欢, 等. 青贮添加剂对牧草青贮品质影响的研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2023, 44(17): 81-85.
41
MISSOTTEN J A M, MICHIELS J, DEGROOTE J, et al. Fermented liquid feed for pigs: an ancient technique for the future[J]. J Anim Sci Biotechno, 2015, 6(1):4-6.
42
TODOROV S D, STOJANOVSKI S, ILIEV I, et al. Technology and safety assessment for lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Bulgarian fermented meat product “lukanka” [J]. Brazilian journal of microbiology, 2017, 48(3): 576-586.
43
SILVA B C, JUNG L R, SANDES S H, et al. In vitro assessment of functional properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from faecal microbiota of healthy dogs for potential use as probiotics [J]. Braz J Microbiol, 2013, 4(3): 267-275.
44
刘婷, 靳烨, 要铎, 等. 植物乳杆菌对苏尼特羊肠道菌群、血浆代谢物及肉品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022,38(3):286-294.
45
ADAMS M C, LUO J, RAYWARD D, et al. Selection of a novel direct-fed microbial to enhance weight gain in intensively reared calves [J]. Anim feed Sci Tech, 2008,145(1):41-52.
46
FRIZZO L S, SOTO L P, ZBRUN M V, et al. Lactic acid bacteria to improve growth performance in young calves fed milk replacer and spray-dried whey powder [J]. Anim feed Sci Tech, 2010, 157(3):159-167.
47
王红梅, 屠焰, 张乃锋, 等. 饲用酶制剂在反刍动物营养中的应用进展[J]. 草业学报, 2017,26(3):199-213.
48
黄右琴, 闫佰鹏, 李发弟, 等. 不同秸秆来源日粮添加酶制剂对湖羊生产性能和瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2020,37(10):2079-2088.
49
刘卓凡, 许贵善, 李博为, 等. 酶制剂调控反刍动物碳氮减量的研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2023,44(4):17-21.
50
周春晖, 孙加龙. 纤维素酶及其应用[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2002,15(2):43-44.
51
孙亚红, 胥福勋, 王玮婕, 等. 复合添加剂对肉牛生长性能和代谢参数的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2019, (18):56-59.
52
李新胜, 张春喜, 孙哲, 等. 加酶高粱青贮对奶牛产奶量的影响[J]. 中国奶牛, 2001(1):26-27.
53
王小平, 王小琪, 李标, 等. 复合菌剂对青贮玉米营养成分及其饲喂滩羊效果的研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020,28(8):1258-1264.
54
陈代文, 伍爱民, 余冰. 猪肠道病毒感染的致病机理与营养调控研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报, 2024, 36(4):2041-2056.
55
徐泽平, 肖润, 沈诗桀, 等. 桑叶青贮中的微生物变化与青贮品质改良[J]. 草业科学, 2020,37(9):1912-1925.

Comments

PDF(594 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/