The nutritional components and feeding values of roughages commonly used for sheep in Northern Shaanxi

GAO Ya'ni, LEI Xiuyun, XIE Zhiguo, HU Xiaoning, BAI Danhua

PDF(564 KB)
PDF(564 KB)
Animals Breeding and Feed ›› 2024, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (08) : 8-13. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.cn42-1648/s.2024.08.002

The nutritional components and feeding values of roughages commonly used for sheep in Northern Shaanxi

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objectives The nutritional components and feeding values of three commonly used roughages including green maize, sorghum and sunflower for sheep in Northern Shaanxi were studied to provide a reference for the further development and utilization of forage in the region. Methods The conventional method of analyzing feed was used to analyze the content of nutritional components including the crude ash (Ash), crude fiber (CF), crude fat (EE), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and the composition of amino acids in three types of roughages. The feeding values of three commonly used roughages were evaluated. Results Among the three commonly used roughages for sheep in Northern Shaanxi, sunflowers had higher content of crude protein (CP) and crude fat (EE), lower content of crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acidic detergent fiber (ADF). Sunflowers have good nutritional value, followed by sorghum and green maize. Sunflowers had the highest relative feeding value and organic matter digestibility (OMD), reaching 863.22% and 112.32%, with the roughage grading index (GI) of 147.59, belonging to the Grade I forage. Compared to green maize, sorghum had a higher content of total amino acids (TAA) and essential amino acids (EAA), reaching 0.9g/100g and 1.24g/100g, which can provide higher quality of protein for animals. Conclusions When feeding three commonly used roughages, priority can be given to feeding sunflowers and sorghum, followed by green maize.

Key words

commonly used roughages / nutritional components / feeding values / amino acid / organic matter digestibility (OMD)

CLC number

S826.5

Cite this article

Download Citations
GAO Ya'ni , LEI Xiuyun , XIE Zhiguo , et al . The nutritional components and feeding values of roughages commonly used for sheep in Northern Shaanxi. Animals Breeding and Feed. 2024, 23(08): 8-13 https://doi.org/10.13300/j.cnki.cn42-1648/s.2024.08.002

References

1
刘柯柯, 李鑫, 霍永智, 等. 榆林市山羊绒品质现状调查[J]. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2024, 43(1):57-59.
2
王缠石, 王韵, 李迎鸽, 等. 陕北白绒山羊产业发展现状及建议[J]. 中国畜牧业, 2021(11):48-50.
3
马彩英. 陕北白绒山羊养殖小区种养一体化模式研究与实践——以陕西榆林市横山区马家梁养殖小区为例[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023.
4
陈晓琳. 肉羊常用粗饲料营养价值和瘤胃降解特性研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛农业大学, 2015.
5
张暄梓, 于胜晨, 郝小燕, 等. 树叶、秸秆及糟渣类饲料在杜×寒杂交羊瘤胃中的降解特性研究[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2021,57(5):165-170, 176.
6
远德龙, 刘学峰, 刘志昌. 4种反刍动物非常规饲料的营养价值及瘤胃发酵参数比较[J]. 饲料研究, 2022,45(14):19-22.
7
赵崇学. 青贮甜高粱秸秆育肥羔羊效果研究[J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2015,35(6):79-80.
8
钟方寅, 郑琛, 李发弟, 等. 向日葵秆和向日葵盘对绵羊营养价值的评定[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(3):205-214.
9
张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007.
10
VAN SOEST P J, ROBERTSON J B, LEWIS B A, et al. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J]. Journal of dairy science, 1991,74(10):3583-3597.
11
ROHWEDER D A, BARNES R F, JORGENSE F, et al. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality[J/OL]. Journal of animal science, 1978,47(3):747[2024-05-24].
12
韩建国, 贾慎修. 放牧绵羊采食量及消化率的研究[J]. 草原牧业杂志, 1987,4(4):35-37.
13
其其格, 金曙光, 刘锋. 内蒙古地区12种牧草的粗饲料分级指数及粗饲料相对值的测定及比较[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,29(3):19-22.
14
张吉鹍, 邹庆华, 卢德勋. 反刍动物粗饲料纤维品质的整体评定研究[J]. 饲料工业, 2011,32(1): 31-34.
15
罗晓莉, 张沙沙, 严明, 等. 云南8种栽培食用菌蛋白质和氨基酸分析及营养价值评价[J]. 食品工业, 2021(8):328-332.
16
王郝为, 杨焕胜, 陈青, 等. 三种非常规粗饲料营养成分及饲用价值的比较研究[J]. 饲料研究, 2017(21):28-31.
17
陈艳, 王之盛, 张晓明, 等. 常用粗饲料营养成分和饲用价值分析.草业学报, 2015,24(5):117-125.
18
张雅飞, 张英杰, 段春辉, 等. 羊用四种粗饲料营养价值评定[J]. 饲料工业, 2017,38(9):27-30.
19
余苗, 王卉, 问鑫, 等. 牧草品质的主要评价指标及其影响因素[J]. 中国饲料, 2013(13):1-3, 7.
20
王慧娟. 羊常用粗饲料营养价值评定[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018.
21
秦贵信, 孙泽威, 龙国徽, 等. 饲料蛋白质的理化特性与其营养价值的关系[J]. 动物营养学报, 2014,26(10):2942-2948.
22
冯红红. 饲用高粱的营养价值研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医科学(电子版), 2021(11):113-114.

Comments

PDF(564 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/