
Effects of lactic acid bacteria additives on the quality of whole plant corn silage of Qiaodan 6
MA Yidan, JI PENG, AN Qingcong, LI Qihua, WEI Qiang, XING Xiaokun, AN Tongxin
Effects of lactic acid bacteria additives on the quality of whole plant corn silage of Qiaodan 6
Objectives To study the effects of self-extracted lactic acid bacteria additive GMDL-25 on the quality of Qiaodan 6 whole corn silage. Methods The whole corn plants of Qiaodan6 at the stage of wax maturity (the whole plant chopped to 2 cm) were selected to set up 3 treatment groups, with 3 replicates for each treatment and 1 bag for each replicate. The natural fermentation group was used as the control group, the experimental group was added with self-extracted lactic acid bacteria additive GMDL-25 and commercially available lactic acid bacteria additive, respectively. After being packed in silage bags, they were vacuum sealed and fermented in a dark and cool place for about 2 months. After fermentation, sensory evaluation was conducted and the number of microorganisms, the content of ammonia nitrogen, pH value, and nutritional composition were determined. The effects of different lactic acid bacteria additives on the whole corn silage quality of Qiaodan 6 were analyzed. Results The whole plant corn silage in the group added with self-extracted lactic acid bacteria additive GMDL-25 had a strong aroma, with color similar to the raw material and the highest sensory index of 20 points. The number of lactic acid bacteria in the group added with self-extracted lactic acid bacteria additive GMDL-25 was 78.00 lgCFU/g, significantly increased (P<0.05) compared with that in the natural fermentation group. Conclusions Adding self-extracted lactic acid bacteria additive GMDL-25 to the whole plant of Qiaodan 6 corn can significantly improve sensory index and the number of lactic acid bacteria, maintaining good silage quality.
GMDL-25 additive / lactic acid bacteria / silage quality / silage corn
S816.53
1 |
王里彦, 严慧, 李金辉, 等. 基于Meta分析的全株玉米青贮营养成分含量及其影响因素[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022,34(2):1352-1360.
|
2 |
李春喜, 叶润蓉, 杜岩功, 等. 高寒牧区青贮玉米生产性能初步研究[J]. 草地学报, 2013,21(6):1214-1217.
|
3 |
李旭业, 徐艳霞, 董扬, 等. 青贮添加剂种类及其对青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 现代畜牧科技, 2016(1):32-33.
|
4 |
王亚芳, 姜富贵, 成海建, 等. 不同青贮添加剂对全株玉米青贮营养价值、发酵品质和瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020,32(6):2765-2774.
|
5 |
洪梅, 刁其玉. 青贮同型与异型发酵接种剂的研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2009,30(22):58-60.
|
6 |
刘子瑜. 布氏乳杆菌及其在青贮饲料中应用的研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2013,34(2):15-18.
|
7 |
王诚, 刘德娟, 何荣彦, 等. 植物乳杆菌和布氏乳杆菌对全株玉米青贮发酵品质影响[J]. 山东畜牧兽医, 2022,43(1):15-18.
|
8 |
成娟丽, 林金水. 布氏乳杆菌与不同乳酸菌联用对玉米青贮发酵、干物质回收率和营养价值的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2018,(20):17-21.
|
9 |
洪梅, 刁其玉, 姜成钢, 等. 布氏乳杆菌对青贮发酵及其效果的研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2011,20(5):266-271.
|
10 |
臧艳运, 王雁, 陈鹏飞, 等. 青贮饲料品质评定标准[C]//中国草学会.中国草学会青年工作委员会学术研讨会论文集(上册). 海口: 中国草学会, 2010.
|
11 |
王林, 孙启忠, 张慧杰. 苜蓿与玉米混贮质量研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011,20(4):202-209.
|
12 |
邵勇军. 青贮饲料加工原理与技术[J]. 畜牧兽医科学(电子版), 2020,(11):179-180.
|
13 |
常玉萍. 洛阳市奶牛场青贮玉米饲料质量评价[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2009.
|
14 |
|
15 |
陈跃鹏, 郑爱荣, 孙骁, 等. 不同方法处理的全株玉米青贮与玉米秸秆青贮对肉牛生长性能及经济效益的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018,30(7):2571-2580.
|
16 |
袁仕改. 不同添加剂对青贮玉米发酵品质及其有氧稳定性的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2018.
|
17 |
侯建建, 白春生, 张庆, 等. 单一和复合乳酸菌添加水平对苜蓿青贮营养品质及蛋白组分的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2016,33(10):2119-2125.
|
18 |
郝丽红, 王彦平, 王勇, 等. 不同类型乳酸菌对玉米果穗青贮饲料品质和营养价值的影响[J]. 中国饲料, 2023(5):163-167.
|
19 |
温雅俐, 高民. 青贮饲料中乳酸菌代谢及其青贮品质影响研究进展[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2011,32(S1):152-154.
|
20 |
高苙宸, 林金生. 乳酸菌青贮与自然青贮的质量及其对反刍动物的影响[J]. 中国奶牛, 2017(6):17-20.
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |