Comparison of benefits of ecological aquaculture models for crayfish in paddy fields

HOU Yingxia, SU Yingbing

PDF(471 KB)
PDF(471 KB)
Animals Breeding and Feed ›› 2024, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (01) : 13-19. DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.cn42-1648/s.2024.01.025

Comparison of benefits of ecological aquaculture models for crayfish in paddy fields

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objectives The benefits of ecological aquaculture of crayfish in paddy fields were compared with those of traditional aquaculture of crayfish to explore the scientific model for farming crayfish in paddy fields. Methods The project team selected new entities of agricultural management as detailed implementation units in four cities (counties) including Qianjiang, Honghu, Jianli, and Gong'an in Hubei Province and conducted contrast experiments between the ecological aquaculture models for crayfish in paddy fields and the traditional aquaculture models for crayfish from 2020 to 2022. The economic and ecological benefits of different models for farming crayfish were compared. Results The net income of ecological aquaculture of crayfish in paddy fields was 27 060.00 yuan/hm2 higher than that of traditional artificial aquaculture of crayfish. The demand of chemical oxygen, the content of ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) in water, the content of total phosphorus (TP) in water, and the content of total nitrogen (TN) in water under the ecological aquaculture of crayfish in paddy fields was 7.82, 2.74, 0.17, 7.26 mg/L lower than that under the traditional aquaculture of crayfish, respectively. Conclusions The ecological aquaculture models for crayfish in paddy fields saves labor, pesticides, and fertilizer, and has significant and stable benefits of economy and ecology compared with the traditional aquaculture models for crayfish.

Key words

crayfish in paddy fields / ecological aquaculture models / economic benefits / ecological benefits

CLC number

F326.11 / F326.4 / X322

Cite this article

Download Citations
HOU Yingxia , SU Yingbing. Comparison of benefits of ecological aquaculture models for crayfish in paddy fields. Animals Breeding and Feed. 2024, 23(01): 13-19 https://doi.org/10.13300/j.cnki.cn42-1648/s.2024.01.025

References

1
何红卫, 乐明凯. 荆楚大地起宏图[N]. 农民日报2019-07-29(1).
2
陈松文, 江洋, 汪金平, 等. 湖北省稻虾模式发展现状与对策分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报2020,39(2):1-7.
3
李亮, 王红玲. 气候智慧型农业新理念模型构建与实践研究[J]. 理论月刊2021(7):42-50.
4
奚业文, 张玲宏. 稻虾综合种养试验效益研究[J]. 河南水产2015(1):20-23.
5
奚业文, 周洵. 稻虾连作共作稻田生态系统中物质循环和效益初步研究[J]. 中国水产2016(3):78-82.
6
刘中来, 袁志华, 谢国强, 等. 赣北地区稻田小龙虾的养殖技术及效益分析[J]. 浙江农业科学201758(2):341-342,346.
7
刘亚迪, 余连祥, 冷华南. 乡村振兴战略背景下现代渔业发展优势、问题及政策分析——以浙江省湖州市南浔区渔业发展为例[J]. 海洋湖沼通报2020(5):155-163.
8
鲁国梁, 许淼, 汪本福, 等. 湖北省虾稻产业可持续发展的调研思考[J]. 湖北农业科学202059(19):23-26.
9
许辉, 赵阳阳, 孙东岳, 等. 稻虾共作模式研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报202224(2):160-168.
10
李嘉尧, 常东, 李柏年, 等. 不同稻田综合种养模式的成本效益分析[J]. 水产学报201438(9):1431-1438.
11
佀国涵, 彭成林, 徐祥玉, 等. 稻虾共作模式对涝渍稻田土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报201725(1):61-68.
12
佀国涵, 彭成林, 徐祥玉, 等. 稻–虾共作模式对涝渍稻田土壤微生物群落多样性及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤201648(3):503-509.
13
王蓉, 朱杰, 金涛, 等. 稻虾共作模式下稻田土壤氨氧化微生物丰度和群落结构的特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报201925(11):1887-1899.
14
HU L L, REN W Z, TANG J J, et al. The productivity of traditional rice-fish co-culture can be increased without increasing nitrogen loss to the environment[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2013, 177: 28-34.

Comments

PDF(471 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/