PDF(690 KB)
Efficacy of Entecavir Alone and in Combination with Peginterferon in the Treatment of Patients with High Viral Load Chronic Hepatitis B
Jiwei FU, Qinglang XU, Si XIE, Xueping TAO, Sheng GUO, Pei SHI, Wentao ZHU, Mengyu TAO, Xiaoping WU
PDF(690 KB)
PDF(690 KB)
Efficacy of Entecavir Alone and in Combination with Peginterferon in the Treatment of Patients with High Viral Load Chronic Hepatitis B
Objective To observe the efficacy of entecavir (ETV) alone and in combination with peginterferon (Peg-IFN) in the treatment of patients with high viral load chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods This prospective cohort study included 152 patients with high viral load CHB who were treated at four hospitals, including the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, between December 2019 and December 2023. Based on the patients' conditions and their own wishes, the patients were divided into the ETV group (n = 102) and the Peg-IFN and ETV combined treatment group (n = 50). The primary endpoint was defined as HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance at week 48. Secondary endpoints were the 48-week HBsAg decline level, HBV e antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance, HBV-DNA negative conversion rate and decline level, and ALT decline level. Measurement data conformed to normal distribution and were compared between two groups using two independent samples t-test, and within-group comparisons before and after treatment were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Count data were compared between two groups using the chi-square test, and within-group comparisons before and after treatment were statistically analyzed using Cochran's Q test for multiple comparisons. Results ALT, HBV-DNA, and HBsAg levels decreased significantly in both groups throughout the 48-week treatment period compared with pre-treatment (P < 0.001). At 48 weeks of treatment, alanine aminotransferase (30.82 ± 9.86) U/L was significantly lower in the ETV group than in the combination therapy group (37.57 ± 19.84) U/L (P = 0.027); The HBV-DNA and HBsAg levels in the ETV group were significantly higher at(1.22 ± 1.17)lg IU/mL and(3.65 ± 0.85)lg IU/mL, respectively, than those in the combination therapy group at(0.82 ± 0.96)lg IU/mL and(2.62 ± 1.45)lg IU/mL (P = 0.034, P < 0.001). Both HBeAg and HBV-DNA clearance were significantly higher in the ETV group at 48 weeks of treatment compared with pre-treatment (P < 0.001), whereas the difference between HBsAg clearance and pre-treatment was not statistically significant (P = 0.171). HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV-DNA clearance rates were significantly higher in the combination therapy group at 48 weeks of treatment compared to pre-treatment (P < 0.05). At 48 weeks of treatment, HBsAg and HBeAg seroclearance rates of 2.0% and 13.7%, respectively, were significantly lower in the ETV group than in the combination therapy group at 12.0% and 38.0% (P = 0.027, P = 0.001); The HBV-DNA clearance rate of 89.2% in the ETV group was lower than that of 94.0% in the combination therapy group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.509). Conclusion The Peg-IFN combined with ETV regimen can be the first recommended treatment option for patients with high viral load CHB.
Chronic hepatitis B / Peginterferon / Entecavir / High viral load / Combination therapy
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
李琼, 毛小荣, 田爱平, 等. 乙肝肝硬化后慢加急性肝衰竭病人发生急性肾脏疾病的影响因素[J]. 西南医科大学学报, 2023, 46(1): 41-45.
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
中华医学会感染病学分会, 中华医学会肝病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2019年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(12): 2648-2669.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
李双玲, 刘丽, 陈艺, 等. 富马酸丙酚替诺福韦与恩替卡韦治疗高血清病毒载量的代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者效果比较研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27(5): 749-752.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
武晓丽. PEG-IFNα-2a与阿德福韦酯的联用方式对HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎疗效的影响[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(12): 2311-2315.
|
| 13 |
蒋兆荣, 邹梅, 姬腾飞, 等. 核苷(酸)类似物联合聚乙二醇干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床疗效分析[J]. 肝脏, 2023, 28(9): 1048-1049, 1052.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
彭麟, 杨春, 李兴泉. 聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合恩替卡韦治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者疗效研究[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2024, 27(5): 677-680.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
李骁. 聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合替诺福韦酯对高病毒载量慢性乙肝初治患者血清Mig、RANTES及肝纤维化指标表达的影响[J]. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(1): 165-168.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |