PDF(1247 KB)
Risk factors for concurrent hepatic hydrothorax before intervention in primary liver cancer and construction of a nomogram prediction model
Yuanzhen WANG, Renhai TIAN, Yingyuan ZHANG, Danqing XU, Lixian CHANG, Chunyun LIU, Li LIU
PDF(1247 KB)
PDF(1247 KB)
Risk factors for concurrent hepatic hydrothorax before intervention in primary liver cancer and construction of a nomogram prediction model
,
Objective To investigate the influencing factors for hepatic hydrothorax (HH) before intervention for primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC), and to construct and assess the nomogram risk prediction model. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 353 hospitalized patients who attended the Third People’s Hospital of Kunming for the first time from October 2012 to October 2021 and there diagnosed with PHC, and according to the presence or absence of HH, they were divided into HH group with 153 patients and non-HH group with 200 patients. General data and the data of initial clinical testing after admission were collected from all PHC patients. The independent-samples t test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between two groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between two groups; the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. After the multicollinearity test was performed for the variables with statistical significance determined by the univariate analysis, the multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent influencing factors. The “rms” software package was used to construct a nomogram risk prediction model, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess the risk prediction model; the “Calibration Curves” software package was used to plot the calibration curve, and the “rmda” software package was used to plot the clinical decision curve and the clinical impact curve. Results Among the 353 patients with PHC, there were 153 patients with HH, with a prevalence rate of 43.34%. Child-Pugh class B (odds ratio [OR]=2.652, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.050 — 6.698, P=0.039), Child-Pugh class C (OR=7.963, 95%CI: 1.046 — 60.632, P=0.045), total protein (OR=0.947, 95%CI: 0.914 — 0.981, P=0.003), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (OR=1.007, 95%CI: 1.001 — 1.014, P=0.025), and interleukin-2 (OR=0.801, 95%CI: 0.653 — 0.981, P=0.032) were independent influencing factors for HH before PHC intervention, and a nomogram risk prediction model was established based on these factors. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the model had a good degree of fitting (χ2=5.006, P=0.757), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.752 (95%CI: 0.701 — 0.803), a sensitivity of 78.40%, and a specificity of 63.50%. The calibration curve showed that the model had good consistency in predicting HH before PHC intervention, and the clinical decision curve and the clinical impact curve showed that the model had good clinical practicability within a certain threshold range. Conclusion Child-Pugh class, total protein, interleukin-2, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein are independent influencing factors for developing HH before PHC intervention, and the nomogram model established based on these factors can effectively predict the risk of developing HH.
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
李姣姣, 杨会会, 霍刚. 原发性肝癌患者临床特征、细胞形态学分析及其预后的影响因素分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2024, 23(6): 566-570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.06.002 .
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
谢远喜, 邱洁净, 唐雯桢, 等. 肝癌病人肝切除术后难治性胸腔积液风险预测模型的构建[J]. 护理研究, 2024, 38(1): 130-134. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2024.01.021 .
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
General Office of National Health Commission. Standard for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer(2022 edition)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38(2): 288-303. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.009 .
国家卫生健康委办公厅. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38(2): 288-303. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.009 .
|
| 19 |
Pleural and Mediastinal Diseases Working Group of Chinese Thoracic Society. Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis of pleural effusion[J]. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis, 2022, 45(11): 1080-1096. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20220511-00403 .
中华医学会呼吸病学分会胸膜与纵隔疾病学组. 胸腔积液诊断的中国专家共识[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2022, 45(11): 1080-1096. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20220511-00403 .
|
| 20 |
马博, 尚天玲, 黄剑洁, 等. 肝性胸水临床研究进展与挑战[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38(2): 452-456. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.040 .
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 69(2): 406-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024 .
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
张丽娜, 马治国, 马伟芳, 等. 失代偿期肝硬化合并肝性胸水临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2023, 43(7): 578-582. DOI: 10.19538/j.nk2023070110 .
|
| 27 |
刘洋. 原发性肝癌微波消融术后胸腔积液相关因素分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2023.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
葛海龙, 杨岳, 虞卫新, 等. 肝内胆管细胞癌根治术后胸腔积液的危险因素研究[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2023, 22(9): 945-948. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2023.09.013 .
|
| 31 |
罗林, 陈浩, 程永浪, 等. 肝癌切除术后胸腔积液危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2021, 30(7): 761-771. DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2021.07.002 .
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
武江海, 舒敬奎, 张剑青, 等. 结核与肿瘤患者胸腔积液中TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4的水平及临床意义[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2019, 40(12): 103-107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2019.12.021 .
|
| 35 |
杜凤娇, 杜博平, 贾红彦, 等. 液态芯片技术筛选胸腔积液细胞因子对结核性胸膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 天津医药, 2024, 52(3): 319-323. DOI: 10.11958/20230793 .
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
刘凌, 舒敬奎, 武江海, 等. Th1/Th2细胞及细胞因子和结核性胸膜炎粘连的相关性[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(2): 239-242, 246. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2018.02.020 .
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
曾瑞璜, 王小林, 曾叶, 等. 基于数据挖掘模型分析CA125、NLR、PLR、hs-CRP联合检测对社区获得性肺炎伴胸腔积液的临床意义[J]. 检验医学, 2020, 35(11): 1103-1107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2020.11.005 .
|
| 40 |
刘芳, 季良, 陈男男, 等. 血清甲胎蛋白异质体L3、超敏C反应蛋白及乙肝病毒载量在诊断乙肝肝硬化与肝癌中的价值[J]. 黑龙江医学, 2021, 45(9): 984-986. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5775.2021.09.035 .
|
| 41 |
|
王远珍、刘春云、刘立负责论文框架;王远珍负责数据收集,统计学分析,绘制图表,起草论文;刘立负责论文修改;田仁海、张映媛、许丹青、常丽仙、刘春云、刘立负责拟定写作思路,指导撰写文章并最后定稿。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |