PDF(854 KB)
ALBI、EZ-ALBI及PALBI评分对HCV相关肝细胞癌患者中期预后的预测价值分析
木唤, 张映媛, 许丹青, 何愿强, 牟春燕, 刘春云, 刘立
PDF(854 KB)
PDF(854 KB)
ALBI、EZ-ALBI及PALBI评分对HCV相关肝细胞癌患者中期预后的预测价值分析
Value of albumin-bilirubin,easy albumin-bilirubin,and platelet-albumin-bilirubin scores in predicting the prognosis of patients with HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma
目的 探讨白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)、简易白蛋白-胆红素(EZ-ALBI)及血小板-白蛋白-胆红素(PALBI)评分对HCV相关肝细胞癌(HCV-HCC)患者2年生存期的预测价值。 方法 回顾性分析2020年1月—2022年1月于昆明市第三人民医院住院治疗的174例HCV-HCC患者临床资料,随访时间为入院后2年。根据随访结果将患者分为生存组(n=95)和死亡组(n=79)。计量资料两组间比较采用成组t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。计数资料两组间比较采用χ2检验。采用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析HCV-HCC患者生存的影响因素。通过Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,分析不同EZ-ALBI分级HCV-HCC患者的2年生存率,并使用Log-rank检验进行组间比较。 结果 生存组与死亡组患者比较,PLT、AST、TBil、Alb、AFP、前白蛋白、凝血酶原时间、国际标准化比值、PALBI评分、ALBI评分、EZ-ALBI评分、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、HCV基因分型、腹腔积液、血管侵犯差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。单因素Cox回归分析结果显示,AST、Alb、AFP、ALBI评分、EZ-ALBI评分、PALBI评分、MELD评分、巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期和腹腔积液是患者生存的影响因素(P值均<0.05);进一步多因素Cox回归分析结果显示,EZ-ALBI评分(HR=1.850,95%CI:1.054~3.247,P=0.032)和腹腔积液(HR=1.993,95%CI:1.030~3.858,P=0.041)是HCV-HCC患者生存的独立危险因素。生存曲线分析结果显示,EZ-ALBI 1级、2级、3级患者的2年生存率分别为90.9%、60.2%和32.2%,不同EZ-ALBI分级患者累积生存率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=26.294,P<0.001)。 结论 EZ-ALBI评分及有无腹腔积液可作为HCV-HCC患者生存情况的预测指标。
Objective To investigate the value of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI),easy albumin-bilirubin (EZ-ALBI),and platelet-albumin-bilirubin (PALBI) scores in predicting 2-year survival in patients with HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCV-HCC). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 174 patients with HCV-HCC who were admitted to The Third People’s Hospital of Kunming from January 2020 to January 2022,and the patients were followed up till 2 years after admission. According to the follow-up results,the patients were divided into survival group with 95 patients and death group with 79 patients. The independent-samples t test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups,and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model analyses were used to investigate the influencing factors for the survival of HCV-HCC patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves and analyze the 2-year survival rate of HCV-HCC patients with different EZ-ALBI grades,and the log-rank test was used for comparison between groups. Results There were significant differences between the survival group and the death group in platelet count,aspartate aminotransferase (AST),total bilirubin,albumin (Alb),alpha-fetoprotein (AFP),prealbumin,prothrombin time,international normalized ratio,PALBI score,ALBI score,EZ-ALBI score,Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score,HCV genotype,peritoneal effusion,and vascular invasion (all P<0.05). The univariate Cox regression analysis showed that AST,Alb,AFP,ALBI score,EZ-ALBI score,PALBI score,MELD score,Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging,and peritoneal effusion were influencing factors for the survival of patients (all P<0.05),and the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that EZ-ALBI score (hazard ratio [HR]=1.850,95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.054 — 3.247,P=0.032) and peritoneal effusion (HR=1.993,95%CI: 1.030 — 3.858,P=0.041) were independent risk factors for the survival of HCV-HCC patients. The survival curve analysis showed that the patients with EZ-ALBI grade 1/2/3 had a 2-year survival rate of 90.9%,60.2%,and 32.2%,respectively,and there was a significant difference in cumulative survival rate between the patients with different EZ-ALBI grades (χ2=26.294,P<0.001). Conclusion EZ-ALBI score and the presence or absence of peritoneal effusion can be used as predictors of the survival of HCV-HCC patients.
肝炎病毒属 / 癌,肝细胞 / ALBI评分 / EZ-ALBI评分 / PALBI评分 / 预后
Hepacivirus / Carcinoma,Hepatocellular / ALBI Score / EZ-ALBI Score / PALBI Score / Prognosis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
杨程凯, 许嘉绵, 王华翔, 等. ALBI和EZ-ALBI评分对肝衰竭肝移植术后早期生存的预测价值[J]. 器官移植, 2022, 13(5): 611-617. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2022.05.010.
|
| [11] |
陈怡, 施荣杰, 张凤莲, 等. PALBI评分在肝癌患者中的临床应用现状[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2022, 31(12): 1342-1345, 1352. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5709.2022.12.005.
|
| [12] |
National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer (2024 edition)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2024, 40(5): 893-918. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240508.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
黎锋, 李博, 朱秋映. 中国丙肝流行特征与诊断研究进展[J]. 国际病毒学杂志, 2023, 30(6): 509-511. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4092.2023.06.014.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
杨松. 丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗与肝癌防治[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(1): 64. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1358.2024.01.011.
|
| [20] |
许姗姗, 仇丽霞, 柳雅立, 等. 丙型肝炎持续病毒学应答后肝癌发生的危险因素及预测模型[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40(6):1259-1263. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240629.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
王月姣, 宋海燕, 邢练军, 等. HBV/HCV感染诱导肝细胞癌的病理机制[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(7): 1381-1386. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.07.040.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
HO SY,
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
HO SY,
|
| [35] |
HO SY,
|
木唤负责设计论文框架,起草论文;张映媛、许丹青负责收集相关数据和文献;何愿强、牟春燕负责统计学分析,绘制图表;刘春云、刘立负责修改论文。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |