
Fatigue stiffness degradation and life prediction method of in-service concrete T-beams
ZUO Xin-dai, ZHANG Jin-quan, ZHAO Shang-chuan
Fatigue stiffness degradation and life prediction method of in-service concrete T-beams
In order to obtain the fatigue stiffness degradation law of in-service concrete T-beams and carry out fatigue life prediction. Based on the theory of damage mechanics, a stepped stiffness model of concrete T-beams including cracking damage was constructed. Through the full-scale model of three 10 m concrete T beams, static and fatigue failure tests were carried out to obtain the evolution law of fatigue residual stiffness with the number of loads. The fatigue damage coefficient and stiffness degradation coefficient were introduced to establish a concrete T beam in service fatigue life prediction model. The analysis results show that with the increase of load, the residual stiffness of the bridge exhibits three-stage decay, in which the initial and later stages of fatigue decay rapidly, but account for a relatively small proportion of the whole life. The result shows that more than 80% of the whole service life is the main stage of bridge service, it is about 82.7% of the initial stiffness at the time of fatigue failure. Finally, according to the working behavior of in-service concrete T-girder bridges, a life prediction method for in-service reinforced concrete girder bridges is proposed, the related research results can provide theoretical support for the study of life prediction of such bridges.
bridge engineering / in-service concrete T-beam / fatigue life / stepped stiffness model / cumulative damage coefficient
1 |
交通运输部. 2019年年交通运输行业发展统计公报[R]. 北京:交通运输部, 2020.
|
2 |
宋秀华, 肖新辉, 鲁乃唯. 基于疲劳损伤的中小跨径桥梁限载取值研究[J]. 交通科学与工程, 2019, 35(2): 58-63.
|
3 |
卫军, 杜永潇, 梁曼舒. 梁结构疲劳刚度退化对模态频率的影响[J] .浙江大学学报:工学版, 2019, 53(5): 899-909.
|
4 |
刘芳平, 易文韬. 钢筋混凝土梁基于疲劳刚度退化的承载力退化模型研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2020, 50(22): 99-104, 66.
|
5 |
汪炳, 黄侨, 刘小玲. 组合梁疲劳后的刚度退化规律及计算模型[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(6): 265-271.
|
6 |
周虎, 肖勇刚, 谭斌. 基于断裂力学的混凝土桥梁疲劳损伤及寿命评估分析[J]. 湖南城市学院学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 27(4): 6-10.
|
7 |
陈万. 重载交通作用下桥梁结构的疲劳损伤数值分析[D].邯郸: 河北工业大学土木工程学院, 2015.
|
8 |
赵少杰, 任伟新. 超限超载交通对桥梁疲劳损伤及可靠度的影响[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 48(11): 3044-3050.
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
朱红兵. 公路钢筋混凝土简支梁桥疲劳试验与剩余寿命预测方法研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学土木工程学院, 2011.
|
12 |
刘芳平, 周建庭. 基于疲劳应变演化的混凝土弯曲强度退化分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(4): 97-105.
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
曹晖, 郑星, 华建民, 等. 基于非线性振动特性的预应力混凝土梁损伤识别[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(2): 190-194.
|
16 |
卫军, 杜永潇. 基于固有频率的梁结构疲劳损伤演化规律[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2019, 50(8): 1866-1875.
|
17 |
朱红兵, 赵耀, 李秀, 等. 疲劳荷载作用下钢筋混凝土梁的刚度退化规律及计算公式[J].土木建筑与环境工程, 2014, 36(2): 1-13.
|
18 |
姚恒盈. 装配式预应力混凝土箱梁静动刚度足尺试验全过程分析[D]. 西安:长安大学公路学院, 2020.
|
19 |
廉伟, 姚卫星.复合材料层压板剩余刚度-剩余强度关联模型[J]. 复合材料学报, 2008, 25(5): 151-156.
|
20 |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |