
热液成矿系统构造控矿理论
杨立强, 杨伟, 张良, 高雪, 申世龙, 王偲瑞, 徐瀚涛, 贾晓晨, 邓军
热液成矿系统构造控矿理论
Developing structural control models for hydrothermal metallogenic systems: Theoretical and methodological principles and applications
构造对成矿的控制是热液成矿系统的典型特征之一,系统剖析多重尺度控矿构造的几何学、运动学、动力学、流变学和热力学对认识矿床成因和预测找矿至关重要;而如何实现控矿构造格架、渗透性结构、成矿流体通道和矿化变形网络由静态到多尺度时-空四维动态的转变,查明流体通道和矿床增量生长过程与控制因素,揭示热液成矿系统的构造-流体耦合成矿机制和定位规律是亟待解决的关键科学难题。为此,我们在对已有相关成果系统梳理的基础上,提出了科学构建热液成矿系统构造控矿理论的基本要点与对应方法及应用范畴:(1)流体而非构造是构造控矿理论的中心,热液系统的流体流动与成矿作用受控于断裂带格架及其渗透性结构,其中渗透率是将流体流动与流体压力变化联系起来理解控矿构造的核心;(2)不同控矿构造组合的关键控制是构造差应力和流体压力的大小,而矿化类型的变化可能是由于构造应力场引起的容矿构造方位的不同和赋矿围岩之间的强度差异所致;(3)流体通道的生长始于超压流体储库上游围岩中孤立的微裂隙沿流体压力梯度最大的方向、随裂隙发育且相互连结而形成新的长裂隙,并最终连通形成断裂网络内的流体通道,矿床的增量生长发生在高流体通量的短爆发期,断层反复滑动驱动其内流体压力、流速和应力快速变化,当由此诱发的流体通道生长破坏了流体系统的动态平衡时,随之而来的流体快速降压就成为金属沉淀成矿的关键驱动因素;(4)以热液裂隙-脉系统野外地质观测和构造-蚀变-矿化网络三维填图为基础,通过宏观与微观各级控矿构造相结合、地质历史与构造应力分析相结合、局部与区域点-线-面相结合、浅部与深部相结合、时间与空间相结合、定性和定量相结合,对各种控矿因素开展多学科、多尺度、多层次、全方位综合研究,是应遵循的基本原则;(5)通过构造-蚀变-矿化网络填图,将蚀变-矿化体与控矿构造的类型、形态、规模、产状和间距等几何学特征联系起来,利用热液裂隙-脉系统和断裂网络拓扑学及矿体三维几何结构分析等定量方法查明控矿构造格架和渗透性结构并揭示矿化变形网络的连通性与成矿潜力;(6)合理构建地质模型,选取合适的热力学参数和动力学边界条件,利用HCh和COMSOL等方法,定量模拟成矿过程中的流体流动、热-质传递、应力变形和化学反应等的时-空变化,是揭示构造-流体耦合成矿机理和定位规律、预测矿化中心和确定找矿目标的有效途径。进而提出了构造控矿理论的研究流程:聚焦构造-流体耦合成矿机制和定位规律这一关键科学问题,选择热液裂隙-脉系统和构造-蚀变-矿化网络为重点研究对象;通过几何学描述、运动学判断、流变学分析、动力学解析和热力学综合,厘定控矿构造格架,定位矿化中心,示踪成矿流体通道和多种矿化样式的增量生长过程及其关键控制,揭示渗透性结构的时-空演变规律及构造再活化与成矿定位的成因关联,建立构造-流体耦合成矿模式,服务新一轮战略找矿突破。以胶东焦家金矿田为例,开展控矿构造理论研究和成矿预测应用实践,证实了其科学性和有效性。
A defining feature of a hydrothermal metallogenic system (HMS) is strong structural control on ore mineralization. A systematic analysis of the geometry, kinematics, thermodynamics, and rheology of multiscale ore control structures is crucial for understanding the genesis of HMSs and for ore prospecting. The main challenges include: transitioning from static to multiscale spatiotemporal analysis of the 4D dynamical system involving ore-control structural frameworks, permeability structures, ore-forming fluid pathways, and mineralization deformation networks; identifying key influencing factors of fluid pathways that control ore deposition; and unraveling the mechanism of structure-fluid coupling control of ore formation and localization. This study presents the theoretical and methodological principles and application for developing structural control models for HMSs in the following aspects. (1) The theoretical core. It states that fluid, not structure, is at the core of a structural control model. Fluid flow and ore formation within a hydrothermal system are influenced by the fault zone architecture and permeability structure, where permeability, in linking fluid flow and fluid pressure variation, is key to understanding ore control structures. (2) Stress and pressure dynamics. It considers that differential stress and fluid pressure difference result in diverse combinations of ore control structures, while differences in regional stress field and host rock strength result in variations in mineralization type. (3) Growth of fluid pathways. It considers that fluid pathways initiate from isolated microfractures within the upstream host rocks of overpressured fluid reservoirs which evolve along the direction of the steepest pressure gradient to form new extended fractures through growth and interconnection. These extended fractures eventually interconnect to form fluid pathways. As ore deposition takes place during brief periods of high fluid flux when repeated fault sliding induces rapid changes in fluid pressure, flow velocity, and stress, rapid pressure release—caused by a disruption of dynamic equilibrium in the fluid system due to fluid pathways growth—is a key factor driving metal precipitation. (4) Integrated research. Methodology involves integrating macro and microscopic examination of ore control structures, integrating geological history and stress analysis, combining local and regional analyses, adopting shallow and deep perspectives, and employing a multidisciplinary, multiscale approach to study various ore-controlling factors. (5) Geological mapping. Methodology involves using structure-alteration-mineralization network mapping to characterize alteration-mineralization rock blocks in terms of geometric parameters for ore control structures (such as type, shape, size, occurrence, spacing), and performing quantitative analyses (such as topological analysis of hydrothermal vein-fracture systems, 3D geometric analysis of ore bodies) to determine ore-control structural frameworks and permeability structures and reveal the connectivity of mineralization deformation networks and their ore-forming potential. (6) Numerical modeling. Methodology involves developing geological models, selecting appropriate thermodynamic parameters and dynamic boundary conditions, and utilizing methods such as HCh and COMSOL to perform quantitative simulation of spatiotemporal variations in fluid flow, heat-mass transfer, stress deformation, and chemical reactions during ore formation. This is an effective approach to unveil the mechanism of ore formation controlled by structure-fluid coupling and ore localization pattern, predict ore-forming centers, and identify mineral exploration targets. Based on the above principles, this paper proposes a research methodology for model building, focusing on deriving metallogenic models and ore deposition patterns based on structure-fluid coupling control. Briefly, hydrothermal veins-fracture systems and structure-alteration-mineralization networks are selected as primary research subjects. Research methods include geometric description, kinematic assessment, rheological/dynamic analyses, and thermodynamic synthesis, seeking to delineate ore-control structural frameworks, identify mineralization centers, trace the developments of ore-forming fluid pathways and various mineralization styles, and reveal the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of permeability structures. Additionally, the causal relationship between tectonic reactivation and ore localization is explored. Finally, a metallogenic model based on structure-fluid coupling is constructed to support strategic mineral exploration. This research methodology was applied for mineral prediction in the Jiaojia gold field, Jiaodong Peninsula; its validity and effectiveness were tested and approved.
热液裂隙-脉系统 / 构造-蚀变-矿化网络 / 渗透性结构与成矿定位 / 流体通道和矿床增量生长 / 构造-流体耦合成矿模式
hydrothermal fracture and vein system / structure-alteration-mineralization network / permeability structure and mineralization localization / incremental growth of fluid pathway and ore deposits / a metallogenic model based on structure-fluid coupling
P611;P613;P614
[1] |
翟裕生. 论成矿系统[J]. 地学前缘, 1999, 6(1): 13-27.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
翟裕生. 成矿系统论[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010: 313.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
翟裕生, 林新多. 矿田构造学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1993: 214.
|
[9] |
陈国达. 成矿构造研究法[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1978: 413.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
邓军, 翟裕生, 杨立强, 等. 剪切带构造-流体-成矿系统动力学模拟[J]. 地学前缘, 1999, 6(1): 115-127.
|
[13] |
邓军, 杨立强, 翟裕生, 等. 构造-流体-成矿系统及其动力学的理论格架与方法体系[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2000, 25(1): 71-78.
|
[14] |
杨立强, 王光杰, 张中杰. 胶东金矿集中区岩石圈结构与深部成矿作用[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 2000, 25(4): 421-427.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
邓军, 陈玉民, 刘钦, 等. 胶东三山岛断裂带金成矿系统与资源勘查[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010: 371.
|
[20] |
杨立强, 邓军, 王中亮, 等. 胶东中生代金成矿系统[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(9): 2447-2467.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
杨立强, 邓军, 宋明春, 等. 巨型矿床形成与定位的构造控制: 胶东金矿集区剖析[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(3): 431-446.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
韩润生. 初论构造成矿动力学及其隐伏矿定位预测研究内容和方法[J]. 地质与勘探, 2003, 39(1): 5-9.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
王义天, 毛景文, 李晓峰, 等. 与剪切带相关的金成矿作用[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(2): 393-400.
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
王偲瑞. 胶西北金矿床构造-流体成矿动力学[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
池国祥, 薛春纪. 成矿流体动力学的原理、研究方法及应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2011, 18(5): 1-18.
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
江小军, 王忠强, 李超, 等. 滇东北会泽超大型铅锌矿Re-Os同位素特征及喜山期成矿作用动力学背景探讨[J]. 岩矿测试, 2018, 37(4): 448-461.
|
[57] |
陈世清. 对称经济学[M]. 北京: 中国时代经济出版社, 2010: 224.
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
赵海, 赵可广, 马耀丽, 等. 胶东新城金矿地质构造特征及深部找矿方向[J]. 地质力学学报, 2004, 10(2): 129-136.
|
[72] |
陆丽娜, 范宏瑞, 胡芳芳, 等. 胶西北新城金矿成矿流体与矿床成因[J]. 矿床地质, 2011, 30(3): 522-532.
|
[73] |
宋明春, 宋英昕, 崔书学, 等. 胶东焦家特大型金矿床深、浅部矿体特征对比[J]. 矿床地质, 2011, 30(5): 923-932.
|
[74] |
陈耀煌, 孙华山, 罗辉隆. 胶西北上庄金矿断裂岩体控矿规律[J]. 地质科技情报, 2012, 31(4): 55-60.
|
[75] |
卫清, 范宏瑞, 蓝廷广, 等. 胶东寺庄金矿床成因: 流体包裹体与石英溶解度证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2015, 31(4): 1049-1062.
|
[76] |
王力, 孙丽伟. 山东省寺庄金矿床成矿流体特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1697-1710.
|
[77] |
宋明春, 宋英昕, 丁正江, 等. 胶东焦家和三山岛巨型金矿床的发现及有关问题讨论[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(1): 92-110.
|
[78] |
魏瑜吉, 邱昆峰, 郭林楠, 等. 胶东大尹格庄金矿床成矿流体特征与演化[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(6): 1821-1832.
|
[79] |
杨喜安, 赵国春, 宋玉波, 等. 胶东牟平-乳山成矿带拆离断层控矿特征及找矿方向[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2011, 35(3): 339-347.
|
[80] |
|
[81] |
|
[82] |
李经纬, 邱昆峰, 马明, 等. 胶东旧店金矿床赋矿岩浆岩岩石成因及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2023, 39(2): 393-410.
|
[83] |
邹为雷, 沈远超, 曾庆栋, 等. 蓬家夼金矿与发云夼金矿地质地球化学特征对比研究: 兼议层间滑动角砾岩型金矿成矿模式[J]. 黄金, 2001(3): 1-7.
|
[84] |
李国华, 丁正江, 宋明春, 等. 胶东新类型金矿: 辽上黄铁矿碳酸盐脉型金矿[J]. 地球学报, 2017, 38(3): 423-429.
|
[85] |
宋明春, 林少一, 杨立强, 等. 胶东金矿成矿模式[J]. 矿床地质, 2020, 39(2): 215-236.
|
[86] |
阿尔伯特ALBERT N N. 胶东平里店金矿床地质-地球化学特征[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2016.
|
[87] |
贾飞, 胡跃亮, 王永锋, 等. 基于Vulcan软件的山东莱州留村金矿区三维建模及资源量估值[J]. 地质与勘探, 2022, 58(1): 12-23.
|
[88] |
宋明春, 张军进, 张丕建, 等. 胶东三山岛北部海域超大型金矿床的发现及其构造-岩浆背景[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(2): 365-383.
|
[89] |
宋明春, 杨立强, 范宏瑞, 等. 找矿突破战略行动十年胶东金矿成矿理论与深部勘查进展[J]. 地质通报, 2022, 41(6): 903-935.
|
[90] |
宋英昕, 宋明春, 丁正江, 等. 胶东金矿集区深部找矿重要进展及成矿特征[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2017, 25(3): 4-18.
|
[91] |
|
[92] |
|
[93] |
|
[94] |
|
[95] |
|
[96] |
|
[97] |
|
[98] |
|
[99] |
|
[100] |
|
[101] |
|
[102] |
陈小龙, 吕古贤, 唐朝永, 等. 显微构造研究在新城金矿成矿深度测算中的应用[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2011, 35(4): 612-617.
|
[103] |
|
[104] |
|
[105] |
|
[106] |
|
[107] |
|
[108] |
|
[109] |
|
[110] |
|
[111] |
|
[112] |
|
[113] |
|
[114] |
|
[115] |
|
[116] |
|
[117] |
|
[118] |
|
[119] |
|
[120] |
|
[121] |
|
[122] |
|
[123] |
|
[124] |
|
[125] |
|
[126] |
|
[127] |
|
[128] |
|
[129] |
|
[130] |
刘石年. 山东玲珑式金矿床矿体空间定位形式及其形成机制的探讨[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 1984(4): 47-56.
|
[131] |
吕古贤, 孔庆存. 胶东玲珑-焦家式金矿地质[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993: 253
|
[132] |
胡受奚, 叶瑛, 刘红樱. 地体构造对金区域成矿的重要意义[J]. 黄金地质, 2001, 7(4): 1-8.
|
[133] |
汪劲草, 王国富, 汤静如. 玲珑-焦家地区金矿成矿构造体制的新认识[J]. 桂林工学院学报, 2002(1): 1-4.
|
[134] |
|
[135] |
|
[136] |
|
[137] |
|
[138] |
|
[139] |
王晨光, 杨立强, 和文言. 滇西北衙金矿床磷灰石微量元素和卤素成分的地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(7): 2213-2224.
|
[140] |
|
[141] |
|
[142] |
|
[143] |
|
[144] |
|
[145] |
|
[146] |
|
[147] |
徐兴旺, 牛磊, 洪涛, 等. 流体构造动力学与成矿作用[J]. 地质力学学报, 2019, 25(1): 1-8.
|
[148] |
|
[149] |
|
[150] |
|
[151] |
孙晓明, 石贵勇, 翟伟, 等. 青藏高原喜马拉雅期碰撞造山型金矿矿化特征和动力学机制: 以哀牢山金矿带为例[J]. 矿床地质, 2010, (S1): 995-996.
|
[152] |
|
[153] |
|
[154] |
|
[155] |
|
[156] |
|
[157] |
|
[158] |
|
[159] |
许德如, 叶挺威, 王智琳. 成矿作用的空间分布不均匀性及其控制因素探讨[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(3): 368-388.
|
[160] |
|
[161] |
|
[162] |
|
[163] |
|
[164] |
|
[165] |
|
[166] |
|
[167] |
|
[168] |
|
[169] |
|
[170] |
|
[171] |
|
[172] |
|
[173] |
|
[174] |
|
[175] |
|
[176] |
肖庆辉. 国外变质岩构造研究概况[J]. 辽宁区域地质, 1981(1): 1-29.
|
[177] |
|
[178] |
郑义. 热液矿床超大比例尺构造-蚀变-矿化填图: 基本原理与注意事项[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(10): 3603-3615.
|
[179] |
|
[180] |
张微, 杨金中, 方洪宾, 等. 东昆仑—阿尔金地区遥感地质解译与成矿预测[J]. 西北地质, 2010, 43(4): 288-294.
|
[181] |
|
[182] |
滕寿仁, 董哲, 王营, 等. 1∶5万三维地质填图方法技术在本溪矿集区的应用[J]. 地质与资源, 2015, 24(4): 383-387.
|
[183] |
傅昭仁, 李德威, 李先富, 等. 变质核杂岩及剥离断层的控矿构造解析[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1992: 110.
|
[184] |
|
[185] |
张田, 张岳桥. 胶东半岛中生代侵入岩浆活动序列及其构造制约[J]. 高校地质学报, 2007, 13(2): 323.
|
[186] |
张田, 张岳桥. 胶北隆起晚中生代构造-岩浆演化历史[J]. 地质学报, 2008, (9): 1210-1228.
|
[187] |
|
[188] |
|
[189] |
|
[190] |
吕庆田, 孟贵祥, 严加永, 等. 成矿系统的多尺度探测: 概念与进展: 以长江中下游成矿带为例[J]. 中国地质, 2019, 46(4): 673-689.
|
[191] |
|
[192] |
|
[193] |
张岳桥, 施炜, 李建华, 等. 大巴山前陆弧形构造带形成机理分析[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84(9): 1300-1315.
|
[194] |
池三川. 隐伏矿床(体)的寻找[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1988: 117.
|
[195] |
单文琅, 宋鸿林, 傅昭仁, 等. 构造变形分析的理论、方法和实践[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1991: 159.
|
[196] |
曾庆丰. 构造矿床学: 曾庆丰论选构造矿床学: 曾庆丰论著选编[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 619.
|
[197] |
杨立强, 邓军, 方云, 等. 构造-流体耦合成矿效应计算模拟[J]. 地球学报, 1999, 20(增刊): 433-437.
|
[198] |
梁一鸿, 孙德育, 张业明. 内蒙古中部地区金矿床控矿构造类型[J]. 黄金, 1993, 14(2): 5-9.
|
[199] |
魏赛拉加. 胶东郭城地区金矿床构造控矿规律研究及找矿方向[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2014.
|
[200] |
李瑞红. 焦家金矿带构造控矿模式[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2017: 195.
|
[201] |
|
[202] |
|
[203] |
|
[204] |
|
[205] |
|
[206] |
|
[207] |
孙岩. 裂隙岩相学研究: 以美国加州深钻岩心的扫描电镜观察为例[J]. 地质论评, 1990, 36(3): 249-254.
|
[208] |
邓军, 杨立强, 方云, 等. 成矿系统嵌套分形结构和自有序效应[J]. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(1): 133-146.
|
[209] |
|
[210] |
|
[211] |
|
[212] |
|
[213] |
|
[214] |
|
[215] |
|
[216] |
陈兴鹏, 李伟, 吴智平, 等. “伸展-走滑”复合作用下构造变形的物理模拟[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2019, 43(6): 1106-1116.
|
[217] |
|
[218] |
|
[219] |
|
[220] |
|
[221] |
|
[222] |
|
[223] |
|
[224] |
赵利, 徐旭辉, 方成名, 等. 中西部冲断带多尺度地球物理解释及其物理模拟实验[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(7): 2885-2896.
|
[225] |
|
[226] |
|
[227] |
|
[228] |
|
[229] |
|
[230] |
|
[231] |
|
[232] |
|
[233] |
|
[234] |
王迪, 吴智平, 宋国奇, 等. 断裂网络体系拓扑结构与油气运移的关系: 以临南洼陷为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021, 50(1): 154-162.
|
[235] |
|
[236] |
任建业. 变形岩石中的运动学标志[J]. 地质科技情报, 1988(1): 23-30.
|
[237] |
孙士军. 黔东北走滑断层之特征及形成机制分析[J]. 贵州地质, 1995, 12(3): 244-251.
|
[238] |
傅昭仁, 蔡学林. 变质岩区构造地质学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1996: 243.
|
[239] |
|
[240] |
|
[241] |
|
[242] |
|
[243] |
|
[244] |
杨农, 陈正乐, 雷伟志, 等. 冀北燕山地区印支期构造特征研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1996: 70.
|
[245] |
孙叶, 谭成轩. 构造应力场研究与实践[J]. 地质力学学报, 2001(3): 254-258.
|
[246] |
|
[247] |
|
[248] |
|
[249] |
|
[250] |
|
[251] |
|
[252] |
|
[253] |
|
[254] |
|
[255] |
|
[256] |
|
[257] |
|
[258] |
|
[259] |
|
[260] |
|
[261] |
|
[262] |
|
[263] |
|
[264] |
|
[265] |
|
[266] |
王偲瑞, 杨立强, 孔鹏飞. 焦家断裂渗透性结构与金矿床群聚机理: 构造应力转移模拟[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(8): 2494-2508.
|
[267] |
王偲瑞, 杨立强, 成浩, 等. 基底构造对矿床定位的控制机制: 焦家金矿带构造应力转移模拟[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(5): 1529-1546.
|
[268] |
宋国政, 李山, 闫春明, 等. 焦家金矿田Ⅰ号主矿体地质特征及找矿方向[J]. 地质与勘探, 2018, 54(2): 219-229.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |