
锡林郭勒盟大型露天煤矿区地质环境时空演化评价
何辉, 穆文平, 张晓, 宋煜冰, 吕远洋, 武雄, 叶宝莹, 白中科
锡林郭勒盟大型露天煤矿区地质环境时空演化评价
Spatio-temporal evolution evaluation of geological environment of large open-pit coal mine areas in Xilin Gol league
内蒙古锡林郭勒盟大型露天煤矿区经过20多年的开发,产生了一系列矿山地质环境问题,矿区地质环境在一定程度上遭到破坏,因此,开展大型露天煤矿区地质环境时空演化评价可为矿区生态地质环境修复提供参考。本文对锡林郭勒盟3个大型矿区进行地质环境时空演化评价。首先通过现场调查,明确了研究区主要的矿山地质环境问题,包括植被覆盖度下降、土地压占(排土场和工业场地)、地形地貌景观破坏(露天采坑)和含水层破坏等4类;其次利用遥感影像定量获取了2000—2020年之间的矿山地质环境问题信息,并建立了矿山地质环境评价指标体系;然后应用层次分析法确定了矿山地质环境评价指标的权重,并通过基于GIS的影响指数模型对矿山地质环境影响进行了评价和区划,探讨了矿山地质环境时空演化规律。研究结果表明:(1)3个大型矿区植被覆盖度下降区域的面积、排土场压占土地面积和露天采坑破坏地形地貌景观面积随时间不断增加;(2)大型矿区采矿对地质环境的影响划分为无影响区、轻微影响区、一般影响区、较强影响区和强烈影响区5个等级分区;(3)3个大型矿区地质环境时空演化规律基本相同,不同影响区的空间分布特征和面积随时间变化的规律不同。
After more than 20 years of development in the large open-pit coal mine areas in Xilin Gol league, Inner Mongolia, a series of mining geological environmental problems have been generated and the geological environment of the mine area has been damaged to some extent, therefore, the evaluation of the spatial and temporal evolution of the geological environment of the large open-pit coal mine areas can provide a reference for the ecological and geological environment restoration of the mine areas. This study evaluates the spatial and temporal evolution of the geological environment in three large mining areas in Xilin Gol league. Firstly, through site investigation, it was clarified that the main mining geological environment problems in the study area mainly include four categories, such as vegetation coverage decline, land occupation (drainage field and industrial sites), topography landscape destruction (open-pit mining) and aquifer destruction. Then remote sensing images were used to quantitatively obtain information on mine geological environment problems between 2000 and 2020, and a mining geological environment evaluation index system was established. After that, the hierarchical analysis was applied to determine the weights of various geological environmental problems, and the impact index model based on GIS was used to evaluate and zone the impact of mine geological environment and explore the law of spatial and temporal evolution of mine geological environment. The results of the study show that: (1) The decreasing vegetation coverage, the area of the land occupied by the soil discharge site and the area of the open pit destroying the landscape of topography and geomorphology are increasing with time in the three large mining areas. (2) The impact of mining on the geological environment in the large mining area is divided into five class sub-areas: no impact area, slight impact area, general impact area, stronger impact area and strong impact area. (3) The spatial and temporal evolution pattern of the geological environment in the three large mining areas is basically the same, and the spatial distribution characteristics and the area change pattern of different impact areas with time are different.
露天煤矿区 / 地质环境 / 植被覆盖度 / 层次分析法 / 影响指数模型 / 时空演化评价
open-pit coal mine areas / geological environment / vegetation coverage / hierarchical analysis / impact index model / spatial and temporal evolution evaluation
X820.3;X87;X141
[1] |
滕吉文, 王玉辰, 司芗, 等. 煤炭、煤层气多元转型是中国化石能源勘探开发与供需之本[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(22): 9169-9193.
|
[2] |
范立民, 马雄德, 李永红, 等. 西部高强度采煤区矿山地质灾害现状与防控技术[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(2): 276-285.
|
[3] |
武强. 我国矿山环境地质问题类型划分研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2003, 30(5): 107-112.
|
[4] |
罗明, 张世文, 魏洪斌, 等. 基于IUCN《矿山生物多样性管理系列指南》的大宝山矿生态修复实践研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 90-99.
|
[5] |
余露, 白光宇, 周建伟, 等. 呼伦贝尔某煤矿区地境结构特征及其对草原生态恢复的意义[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2019, 26(4): 29-36.
|
[6] |
郝大海, 姚玉增, 关长庆, 等. 基于高分辨率遥感技术的辽宁大孤山铁矿排土场滑坡灾害评价[J]. 世界地质, 2020, 39(4): 937-945.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
杨金中, 许文佳, 姚维岭, 等. 全国采矿损毁土地分布与治理状况及存在问题[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 83-89.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
张晓德, 刘桂香, 王梦圆, 等. 开矿对锡林浩特市草原景观的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2018, 40(3): 102-109.
|
[12] |
郭二果, 蔡煜, 马静, 等. 草原区露天煤矿开发地下水水质影响评价[J]. 中国煤炭, 2015, 41(1): 123-130.
|
[13] |
李建中, 周爱国, 周建伟, 等. 华北煤田矿山开采导致含水层破坏风险评估: 以淄博洪山煤矿为例[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(3): 1027-1040.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
张紫昭, 隋旺华. 新疆地区煤矿地质环境影响程度分析评价模型[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(2): 344-352.
|
[18] |
蒋复量, 周科平, 李长山, 等. 基于层次分析和灰色综合评判的石膏矿山地质环境影响评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(3): 125-131.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
贾晗, 刘军省, 殷显阳. 安徽铜陵硫铁矿集中开采区矿山地质环境评价研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 132-141.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
王爽, 李庆旭, 张彪. 锡林郭勒盟净初级生产力时空变化及其气候影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(3): 825-834.
|
[25] |
张继贤, 顾海燕, 杨懿, 等. 高分辨率遥感影像智能解译研究进展与趋势[J]. 遥感学报, 2021, 25(11): 2198-2210.
|
[26] |
张凯翔. 露天矿地质环境解译标志体系和信息提取方法的研究及示范应用[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学(武汉), 2018: 29-95.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
李苗苗. 植被覆盖度的遥感估算方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院(遥感应用研究所), 2003: 41-55.
|
[29] |
武强, 王金华, 刘东海, 等. 煤层底板突水评价的新型实用方法Ⅳ: 基于GIS的AHP型脆弱性指数法应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2009, 34(2): 233-238.
|
[30] |
中华人民共和国环境保护部. 环境影响评价技术导则: 地下水环境: HJ 610—2011[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2011.
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
白中科, 周伟, 王金满, 等. 再论矿区生态系统恢复重建[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(11): 1-9.
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |