Discussion on the improvement of the textbook of formulology based on the method of prescription classification

Yuanchen DING, Yulan BAI, Zhongyong YIN

PDF(543 KB)
PDF(543 KB)
Education of chinese medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 12-17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2025.01.397

Discussion on the improvement of the textbook of formulology based on the method of prescription classification

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The overall structure and writing format of formulology textbooks in higher education institutions of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) have become relatively stable. However, disputes remain regarding the classification of prescriptions, including vague classification standards, a disconnect between classification and clinical practice, and limitations in classification evaluation. Through an analysis of the 11th edition of the textbook Formulology published by the China Traditional Chinese Medicine Publishing House, it is found that the species classification method combines both the clinical advantages of disease-based classification and the theoretical strengths of function-based classification. The species classification unifies standards, making it suitable for theoretical teaching, while emphasizing the correspondence between prescriptions and syndromes, enhancing its clinical relevance. This method highlights the unique characteristics of TCM prescriptions, provides a clear research path, and fosters the development of students’ clinical thinking and practical abilities. Additionally, it promotes the modern research of TCM with a focus on clinical value, offering useful insights for improving the classification method in the current formulology textbooks.

Key words

species classification / formulology / textbook of Formulology

Cite this article

Download Citations
Yuanchen DING , Yulan BAI , Zhongyong YIN. Discussion on the improvement of the textbook of formulology based on the method of prescription classification. Education of chinese medicine. 2025, 44(1): 12-17 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2025.01.397

References

1
陈西平,叶品良,贾波,等.关于《方剂学》教材中方剂分类方法的建议[J].时珍国医国药201526(7):1734-1735.
2
赵则阔,李春晖,杨具洁,等.论方剂的分类[J].广州中医药大学学报201936(5):746-751.
3
李冀,左铮云.方剂学[M].5版.北京:中国中医药出版社,2021.
4
张秉成.成方便读[M].张效霞,杜鹃,校注.北京:学苑出版社,2010:97.
5
张正,李少创,秦亚莉,等.基于医案数据挖掘探讨地黄饮子临床应用规律[J].辽宁中医药大学学报202325(12):121-126.
6
马媛虹,程淼,李长安,等.麻杏石甘汤辅助治疗肺系疾病的研究[J].世界中医药202318(18):2696-2700.
7
程海波,王俊壹,李柳,等.中医肿瘤“抗癌复衡”理论探讨[J].中华中医药杂志202338(6):2522-2525.
8
屈子怡,张雨田,王红,等.济川煎干预肠道动力改善慢传输型便秘的机制探究[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志202329(5):663-666.
9
刘聪,张悦,张润涛,等.济川煎对CaMKⅡγ沉默及过表达结肠平滑肌细胞的影响及机制研究[J].中药药理与临床202339(10):2-7.
10
田苗芳,吴俊武,谭王琪,等.“和方之祖”小柴胡汤及其衍化方探析[J].山西中医药大学学报202324(12):1395-1398.
11
杨杏林,梁尚华.近代中医未刊本精选-第十六册-医案医话[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2016:214.
12
岳美中.岳美中经方研究文集[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2012:8.
13
黄煌.经方方证[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2022:5-7.
14
徐灵胎.慎疾刍言[M].孟景春,点注.南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1984:4.
15
张璐.张氏医通[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:28.
16
汤小虎,邓中甲.百病之主桂枝说[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:50-52.
17
黄菁,王仕奇,汤小虎.桂枝汤及其类方、合方治疗自身免疫病的研究进展[J].医学综述202127(18):3694-3700.
18
丁娜娜,许二平,张楠,等.桂枝汤及其类方加减治疗抑郁症的研究新进展[J].中华中医药学刊202240(11):137-141.
19
刘翠航.统编教材建设参与意识形态再生产的历史观照[J].教学与管理2022(31):64-66.
20
张仲景.伤寒论[M].太原:山西科学技术出版社,2017:153.
21
段苦寒.中医类方辞典[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1995:1.

Comments

PDF(543 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/