
东北黑土区地埂间距对土壤物理性质空间分布特征影响
邵帅, 刘滨辉, 魏思雨, 付玉
东北黑土区地埂间距对土壤物理性质空间分布特征影响
The Impact of Field Ridge Spacing on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Physical Properties in the Northeast Black Soil Region
明确不同地埂植物带间距的坡耕地土壤持水能力和土壤结构的空间分布特征,为东北黑土区地埂植物带及坡耕地水土保持措施的优化提供科学依据。选取修筑地埂植物带的坡耕地(地埂1为埂带间距为12.5 m;地埂2为埂带间距为19.5 m)为研究对象,以坡耕地为对照,采用空间均匀布点取样法获取表层(0~15 cm)土壤的基本物理性质指标,量化不同地埂植物带间距的坡耕地土壤持水能力和土壤结构的空间分布特征差异。结果表明,在坡耕地修筑地埂后,土壤的总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、饱和持水量、田间持水量和毛管持水量均显著增加,且在整个坡面上分布相对均匀。此外,地埂1土壤的总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、饱和持水量、田间持水量、毛管持水量是地埂2的0.96~1.11、1.21~1.31、1.03~1.25、1.22~1.78、1.33~1.52倍。地埂样地机械稳定团聚体质量分数、平均重量直径、水稳性团聚体质量分数、几何平均直径在所有4个田面都有显著性提高,是无措施坡耕地的1.01~1.15、0.94~1.61、1~1.17、1.05~1.55倍,表明修筑地埂后的坡耕地较无措施的对照样地能够有效改善土壤结构。地埂1土壤机械稳定团聚体质量分数、平均重量直径、水稳性团聚体质量分数、几何平均直径是地埂2的1.08~1.14、0.95~1.28、1.07~1.15、1.14~1.40倍。修筑地埂可以改善土壤持水能力和土壤结构特征,较小的地埂间距改善作用更为显著。
This study aims to clarify the spatial distribution characteristics of ridge plant belts on soil water-holding capacity and soil structure in sloping farmland, providing a scientific basis for optimizing ridge plant belt configurations and soil and water conservation measures in Northeast China's black soil region. Sloping farmland with ridge plant belts was selected as the research object (Ridge 1:ridge spacing of 12.5 m; Ridge 2:ridge spacing of 19.5 m), and sloping farmland was selected as the control. The uniform spatial point sampling method was obtained using basic physical property indicators in the surface layer (0-15 cm), and to quantify the differences in the spatial distribution characteristics of soil water-holding capacity and soil structure in sloping farmland with different spacing of ridge plant belts. The result showed that, the sloping farmland with ridge construction showed a significant increase in total porosity, capillary porosity, saturated water-holding capacity, field capacity, and capillary water-holding capacity, with a relatively uniform distribution across the slope. In addition, compared to the Ridge 2, the soil of Ridge 1 showed an increase of 0.96-1.11 times in total porosity, 1.21-1.31 times in capillary porosity, 1.03-1.25 times in saturated water-holding capacity, 1.22-1.78 times in field capacity, and 1.33-1.52 times in capillary water-holding capacity, respectively. The soil mechanical stable aggregate mass fraction, MWD (mean weight diameter), water-stable aggregate mass fraction, and GMD (geometric mean diameter) in the sloping farmland with ridge showed significant improvements across all fields. Compared to the controls, the sloping farmland with ridge increased by 1.01-1.15 times, 0.94-1.61 times, 1-1.17 times, and 1.05-1.55 times, respectively. This indicated that the sloping farmland with ridge effectively improved soil structure compared to the control. Moreover, compared to the sloping farmland with Ridge 2, the soil mechanical stable aggregate mass fraction, MWD, water-stable aggregate mass fraction, and GMD in the sloping farmland with Ridge 1 increased by 1.08-1.14 times, 0.95-1.28 times, 1.07-1.15 times, and 1.14-1.40 times, respectively. Constructing ridges can improve water-holding capacity and soil structure characteristics, with a more significant improvement effect observed in relatively small distances smaller distances between ridges.
黑土区 / 地埂植物带 / 空间变化 / 土壤持水能力 / 土壤结构特征
Black soil region / ridge plant belt / spatial variation / soil water-holding capacity / soil structure characteristics
S157.3+2 / S151.9+2
1 |
张瑜,刘肃,徐子棋,等.黑土区坡地环境因子对紫斑牡丹生长和产量的影响[J].森林工程,2020,36(4):21-28.
|
2 |
张兴义,刘晓冰.东北黑土区沟道侵蚀现状及其防治对策[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(3):320-326.
|
3 |
阎百兴,杨育红,刘兴土,等.东北黑土区土壤侵蚀现状与演变趋势[J].中国水土保持,2008(12):26-30.
|
4 |
田芷源,卢慧中,马瑞,等.东北黑土区耕地侵蚀退化空间分异特征[J/OL].土壤学报,1-16[2024-11-17].
|
5 |
吕沅杭,王姿澄,董灵波.基于RUSLE模型的帽儿山实验林场不同林分类型土壤侵蚀动态评估[J].森林工程,2024,40(3):20-32.
|
6 |
何舢,韩少杰,王丹彤,等.典型黑土区坡耕地表层土壤活性有机碳变化特征[J].森林工程,2024,40(2):85-91.
|
7 |
杨文文,张学培,王洪英.东北黑土区坡耕地水土流失及防治技术研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2005(5):236-240.
|
8 |
张瑜,徐子棋,杨献坤,等.吉林省山地丘陵区典型坡面水土保持措施适宜性研究[J].森林工程,2021,37(6):25-33,38.
|
9 |
王保一,张荣华,荆莎莎,等.降雨和坡度对路基边坡产流产沙的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(2):114-120.
|
10 |
薛建斌.国家坡耕地水土流失综合治理试点工程静宁县项目区建设的有效尝试[J].中国水土保持,2011(4):53-54.
|
11 |
包昂,范昊明,许秀泉,等.东北半干旱区不同耕作方式下的侵蚀性降雨标准比较[J].土壤通报,2022,53(1):81-88.
|
12 |
陈光,范海峰,陈浩生,等.东北黑土区水土保持措施减沙效益监测[J].中国水土保持科学,2006(6):13-17.
|
13 |
吕刚,班小峰,雷泽勇,等.东北黑土区坡耕地治理过程中的水土保持效应[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(6):51-55.
LYU G,
|
14 |
冯洋,郭成久,李勇,等.不同水土保持措施对黑土区坡耕地氮、磷流失的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):47-50,56.
|
15 |
王禹宸.黑土区埂带植物筛选及其效益评价[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2015.
|
16 |
白建宏.东北黑土区埂带水土保持植物引进筛选[J].中国水土保持,2016(3):31-33.
|
17 |
陈立新.土壤实验实习教程[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,2005.
|
18 |
魏思雨,张延玲,刘滨辉,等.东北黑土区地埂坡耕地土壤物理性质的空间分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(4):135-144.
|
19 |
刘明义,许晓鸿,刘艳军,等.不同植物带地埂土壤抗侵蚀效果研究[J].中国水土保持,2012(7):43-45,75.
|
20 |
金万鹏.典型黑土区坡耕地土壤性状及水保措施优化配置研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2020.
|
21 |
贾燕锋,王佳楠,范昊明,等.东北黑土区水土保持措施防治多营力侵蚀的作用与优化配置[J].中国水土保持科学,2022,20(5):124-132.
|
22 |
赵梅,孟令钦,王秀颖.地埂植物带在坡耕地治理中的作用与综合效益分析——以东北黑土区为例[J].南方农业学报,2014,45(6):1015-1020.
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
杜兰兰,王志齐,王蕊,等.模拟条件下侵蚀-沉积部位土壤CO2通量变化及其影响因素[J].环境科学,2016,37(9):3616-3624.
|
27 |
张发民,杜兰兰,袁瀛,等.土壤侵蚀和沉积对土壤理化性状的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(6):161-167.
|
28 |
张孝存,郑粉莉,安娟,等.典型黑土区坡耕地土壤侵蚀对土壤有机质和氮的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(4):182-186.
|
29 |
赵赛东.不同水土保持措施对黑土坡耕地土壤侵蚀及肥力的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2016.
|
30 |
宋春雨,屈远强,张兴义,等.地埂水土保持技术回顾[J].土壤与作物,2018,7(1):1-12.
|
31 |
史志华,刘前进,张含玉,等.近十年土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1117-1127.
|
32 |
杨青松,杨伟,彭珏,等.典型黑土区坡耕地土壤微生物多样性及群落结构对侵蚀-沉积的响应[J/OL].土壤学报,1-15[2024-05-12].
|
33 |
李娅芸,刘雷,安韶山,等.应用Le Bissonnais法研究黄土丘陵区不同植被区及坡向对土壤团聚体稳定性和可蚀性的影响[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(2):287-298.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |