PDF(1190 KB)
细煤泥电渗、振动挤压脱水试验研究及主控因素分析
林雪松, 李梦凡, 王东, 赵龙, 刘晟楠, 李沈玲, 桑雨, 王来贵
PDF(1190 KB)
PDF(1190 KB)
细煤泥电渗、振动挤压脱水试验研究及主控因素分析
Research of electrical osmosis and vibration dehydration experiments on fine coal slurry and analysis of the main controlling factors
为探寻高效、快速促进细煤泥脱水的有效途径,采用改装的空心圆柱扭剪仪进行多组平行试验,对比3载荷连续作用、2载荷同时作用、3载荷同时作用下细煤泥脱水过程与效果。研究结果表明:连续作用最佳脱水方案为挤压-振动-电渗;振动在挤压压力较小或脱水早期效果较好,振动脱水所需时间较短,频率接近固体固有频率时振动脱水效果最佳;电渗在挤压压力较大或脱水后期效果较好,单独挤压基础上每增加一种脱水措施均会产生新增的脱水量,同时缩短脱水时间;在相同载荷水平下,多种脱水措施同时作用的脱水效果优于连续作用。
In order to explore an effective way to promote the dewatering of fine coal slime efficiently and quickly, multiple sets of parallel tests were carried out by using the modified hollow cylindrical torsion shear apparatus, and the dewatering process and effect of fine coal slime under the continuous action of 3 loads, the simultaneous action of 2 loads and the simultaneous action of 3 loads were compared. The experimental results show that the best dehydration scheme for continuous action is extrusion-vibration-electroosmotic; the effect of vibration dehydration is better when the extrusion pressure is small or the early stage of dehydration is better, the time required for vibration dehydration is shorter, and the vibration dehydration effect is the best when the frequency is close to the natural frequency of the solid. The effect of electroosmosis is better in the later stage of extrusion pressure or dehydration. On the basis of single extrusion, each additional dehydration measure will produce new dehydration amount and reduce the dehydration time. The dehydration effect of continuous action under the same load level is not as good as that of simultaneous action.
煤泥 / 脱水 / 挤压 / 振动 / 电渗 / 空心圆柱扭剪仪
coal slime / dehydration / extrusion / vibration / electro-osmosis / hollow cylinder apparatus
TU411.4
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
吴春野.不同堆煤工况下的落煤塔结构静力特性研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2016,27(5):185-188.
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
陶燕丽,周建,龚晓南,等.铁和铜电极对电渗效果影响的对比试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(2):388-394.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
白冰,周健,曹宇春.冲击荷载作用下软粘土变形和孔压的若干问题[J].同济大学学报,2001,29(3):268-272.
|
| 18 |
张季超,梁铁锚,杨永康.动力排水固结法处理软土地基的关键技术研究[J].施工技术,2012,41(3):42-45.
ZHANG Jichao,LIANG Tiemao,YANG Yongkang,Study on the key construction technology of dynamic consolidation by drainage for soft soil ground[J].Construction Technology,2012,41(3):42-45.
|
| 19 |
李彰明,林军华.静动力排水固结法处理淤泥软基振动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2008,29(9):2378-2382.
|
| 20 |
房营光,朱忠伟,莫海鸿,等.碱渣土的振动排水固结特性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2008,29(1):43-47.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
苗永红,马小朋,殷杰.振动排水条件下软黏土的渗透特性试验研究[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2024,43(1):48-53.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |