PDF(1250 KB)
Effects of genomic instability and MYC gene mutation of non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells on resistance of gemcitabine
Zongjun CHEN,Yahong CHEN,Liyun HUANG,Ziying LIANG
PDF(1250 KB)
PDF(1250 KB)
Effects of genomic instability and MYC gene mutation of non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells on resistance of gemcitabine
Objective To discuss the effects of genomic instability and MYC gene mutation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) A549 cells on the resistance of gemcitabine, and to clarify the mechanism. Methods The A549 cells were continuously treated with 2 mg·L-1 of gemcitabine (A549 group) to establish the resistant cell line A549R (A549R group), and si-NC and si-MYC were transfected into the A549R cells to regarded as si-NC A549R group and si-MYC A549R group, respectively. CCK-8 assay was used to detect the inhibitory rates of the cells in various groups after treated with various concentrations of gemcitabine (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg·L-1);flow cytometry was used to detect the apoptotic rates of the cells in various groups; transcriptome sequencing technology (RNA-seq) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signaling pathway enrichment analysis were used to identify the differentially expressed genes in the A549 and A549R cells; real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) method was used to detect the expression levels of muts homology 2 (MSH2), muts homology 6 (MSH6), and recombinant DNA repair protein RAD50(RAD50) in the A549 and A549R cells; Western blotting method was used to detect the expression levels of genome instability-related proteins MYC proto-oncogene (MYC) and phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AX) in the cells in various groups; chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was used to detect the enrichment of RNA pol Ⅱ and γH2AX on the MYC gene; PCR method was used to amplify and detect the mutations in MYC gene in the A549R cells. Results Compared with A549 group, the inhibitory rates of the A549R cells in A549R group treated with 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg·L-1 gemcitabine were decreased, and the apoptotic rate of the cells after treated with 8 mg·L-1 gemcitabine was decreased (P<0.05). Compared with A549 group, a total of 234 mRNAs in the cells in A549R group were upregulated and 205 mRNAs in the cells were downregulated, and the expression levels of mismatch repair-related genes (MSH2 and MSH6), RAD50, and MYC were significantly increased (P<0.05). The KEGG signaling pathway enrichment analysis showed that the upregulated genes were mainly involved in non-homologous end-joining, mRNA surveillance pathway, and DNA replication signaling pathways. Compared with A549 group, the expression levels of MYC and γH2AX proteins in the cells in A549R group were increased (P<0.05).The ChIP assay results showed that the enrichment of RNA pol Ⅱ and γH2AX at the MYC transcription start site and exon 2, with a G254A mutation identified in MYC exon 2 was increased. Compared with si-NC A549R group, the expression levels of MYC mRNA and protein in the cells in si-MYC A549R group were decreased (P<0.05), the inhibitory rates of the cells after treated with 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg·L-1 gemcitabine were increased(P<0.05), and the apoptotic rates were increased (P<0.05). Conclusion The genome instability of the A549R NSCLC cells resistant to gemcitabine is increased, and the mutations and amplification occur in the MYC gene. Knockdown of MYC can restore the sensitivity of A549R cells to gemcitabine.
Gemcitabine / Cancer,non-small cell lung / Genomic instability / MYC augmentation / MYC mutation
R734.2
| 1 | MILLER K D, FIDLER-BENAOUDIA M, KEEGAN T H, et al. Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults,2020[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2020,70(6):443-459. |
| 2 | MOLINA J R, YANG P, CASSIVI S D, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2008, 83(5):584-594. |
| 3 | JONNA S, SUBRAMANIAM D S. Molecular diagnostics and targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an update[J]. Discov Med, 2019, 27(148):167-170. |
| 4 | NEGRI M, GENTILE A, ANGELIS C D, et al. Vitamin D-induced molecular mechanisms to potentiate cancer therapy and to reverse drug-resistance in cancer cells[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(6):1798. |
| 5 | WEI L, WEN J Y, CHEN J, et al. Oncogenic ADAM28 induces gemcitabine resistance and predicts a poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(37):5590-5603. |
| 6 | XIE X M, LEE J, LIU H, et al. Birinapant enhances gemcitabine's antitumor efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer by inducing intrinsic pathway-dependent apoptosis[J]. Mol Cancer Ther, 2021, 20(2):296-306. |
| 7 | LIU K, GENG Y, WANG L, et al. Systematic exploration of the underlying mechanism of gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J]. Mol Oncol, 2022, 16(16):3034-3051. |
| 8 | 钱麒钰,袁改利,马珊珊,等.槲皮素通过miR-101/EZH2轴介导的EMT途径改善NSCLC吉西他滨耐药的机制研究[J].天津医药,2022,50(2):125-130. |
| 9 | 曲智锋,徐 远,王 培.FTY720联合吉西他滨对非小细胞肺癌肿瘤相关细胞株增殖和凋亡作用的研究[J].重庆医学,2017,46(17):2334-2336. |
| 10 | LIN H, CHEN X N, PAN J N, et al. Secretion of miRNA-326-3p by senescent adipose exacerbates myocardial metabolism in diabetic mice[J]. J Transl Med, 2022, 20(1):278. |
| 11 | 赵坤宇, 亓妍文, 秦国慧, 等. 中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值和淋巴细胞单核细胞比值对PD-1抑制剂治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的预测价值[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2022, 57(3): 379-382. |
| 12 | KIM M S, YANG S H, KIM M S. TRPML3 enhances drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells by promoting Ca2+-mediated lysosomal trafficking[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2022, 627:152-159. |
| 13 | SZAKáCS G, PATERSON J K, LUDWIG J A, et al. Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer[J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2006, 5(3):219-234. |
| 14 | PARK J M, PENG J M, SHEN Y S, et al. Phosphomimetic Dicer S1016E triggers a switch to glutamine metabolism in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer[J]. Mol Metab, 2022, 65:101576. |
| 15 | CHEN C, ZHAO S J, ZHAO X R, et al. Gemcitabine resistance of pancreatic cancer cells is mediated by IGF1R dependent upregulation of CD44 expression and isoform switching[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2022, 13(8):682. |
| 16 | TOSCHI L, FINOCCHIARO G, BARTOLINI S,et al. Role of gemcitabine in cancer therapy[J]. Future Oncol, 2005, 1(1):7-17. |
| 17 | TUNG C L, CHIU H C, JIAN Y J, et al. Down-regulation of MSH2 expression by an Hsp90 inhibitor enhances pemetrexed-induced cytotoxicity in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells[J]. Exp Cell Res, 2014, 322(2):345-354. |
| 18 | SYED A, TAINER J A. The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex conducts the orchestration of damage signaling and outcomes to stress in DNA replication and repair[J]. Annu Rev Biochem, 2018, 87:263-294. |
| 19 | KUO L J, YANG L X. Gamma-H2AX-a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks[J]. In Vivo, 2008, 22(3):305-309. |
| 20 | WANG X F, ZHANG P H, DENG K. MYC promotes LDHA expression through microRNA-122-5p to potentiate glycolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst), 2022, 2022:1435173. |
| 21 | HINDS J W, FERIS E J, WILKINS O M, et al. S146L in MYC is a context-dependent activating substitution in cancer development[J]. PLoS One, 2022,17(8):e0272771. |
| 22 | CHANG H W, FEOFANOV A V, LYUBITELEV A V,et al. N-terminal tails of histones H2A and H2B differentially affect transcription by RNA polymerase Ⅱ in vitro [J]. Cells, 2022, 11(16):2475. |
| 23 | MAO H J, CUI R F, WANG X C. Association analysis of selenoprotein S polymorphisms in Chinese Han with susceptibility to gastric cancer[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(7):10993-10999. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |