Effects of shaving or segmental bowel resection on intestinal function in patients with bowel endometriosis: a 10-year follow-up study

TIAN Qi, CHEN Yun, LI Xin-xiang, LU Wei-qi, YE Jiang-feng, HUA Ke-qin, YI Xiao-fang

PDF(1158 KB)
PDF(1158 KB)
Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (03) : 349-357. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2025.03.005
Papers

Effects of shaving or segmental bowel resection on intestinal function in patients with bowel endometriosis: a 10-year follow-up study

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics of preoperative intestinal symptoms in patients with bowel endometriosis and to compare the effects of shaving versus segmental bowel resection on postoperative intestinal function. Methods A total of 105 patients diagnosed with bowel endometriosis and treated by the same surgical team at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University between Aug 1, 2013 and Dec 30, 2017 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Clinical data were collected via outpatient visits and telephone follow-ups at four time points: preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1: Nov 2018; T2: Nov 2020; T3: Apr 2024). The primary outcome was bowel symptoms and gastrointestinal function scores; secondary outcome was pain scores. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to analyze the interaction effect of surgical approach and follow-up time on outcomes. Results Ultimately, a total of 89 patients were included (15.24% loss to follow-up), among whom 79 patients (88.76%) underwent shaving excision. Preoperatively, 46 patients (51.68%) presented with bowel symptoms, primarily anus bulge (21 cases, 46.65%) and diarrhea (15 cases, 32.61%) during menstruation. Postoperatively, there was a significant increase in constipation rates (T1:71.43%;T2:50.00%;T3:72.00%). Both surgical groups exhibited significant improvements in dysmenorrhea, gastrointestinal discomfort scores as well as gastrointestinal quality of life index (P<0.000 5). However, the segmental resection group had significantly higher scores for low anterior resection syndrome, constipation compared with the shaving excision group(P=0.02 and P=0.05). Conclusion Approximately half of the patients with bowel endometriosis exhibit typical bowel symptoms preoperatively, such as anus bulge and diarrhea. Both shaving excision and segmental resection effectively alleviate pain; however, shaving excision demonstrates an advantage regarding preservation of bowel function, whereas segmental resection may elevate risks associated with postoperative constipation or altered defecation patterns due to structural changes. The selection of surgical approach should carefully balance lesion removal and functional preservation, moreover, be sure that potential risks are thoroughly informed to patients prior to surgery.

Key words

bowel endometriosis / surgical approach / bowel symptoms / intestinal dysfunction

Cite this article

Download Citations
TIAN Qi , CHEN Yun , LI Xin-xiang , et al . Effects of shaving or segmental bowel resection on intestinal function in patients with bowel endometriosis: a 10-year follow-up study. Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences. 2025, 52(03): 349-357 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2025.03.005

References

1
CRESTANI A MERLOT B GOUALARD PH,et al.Bowel endometriosis: surgical customization is demanding[J].Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol202494:102495.
2
HORNE AW MISSMER SA.Pathophysiology,diagnosis,and management of endometriosis[J].BMJ2022379:e070750.
3
HEINZ-PARTINGTON S COSTA W MARTINS WP,et al.Conservative vs radical bowel surgery for endometriosis:a systematic analysis of complications[J].Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol202161(2):169-176.
4
FENG J ZHANG S CHEN J,et al.Long-term trends in the incidence of endometriosis in China from 1990 to 2019:a joinpoint and age-period-cohort analysis[J].Gynecol Endocrinol202137(11):1041-1045.
5
田琦,易晓芳.深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症相关肠道功能紊乱的研究进展[J].国际妇产科学杂志201946(1):4.
6
ROMAN H HUET E BRIDOUX V,et al.Long-term outcomes following surgical management of rectal endometriosis:seven-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized trial[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol202229(6):767-775.
7
QUINTAIROS RDA BRITO LGO FARAH D,et al.Conservative versus radical surgery for women with deep infiltrating endometriosis:systematic review and meta-analysis of bowel function[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol202229(11):1231-1240.
8
CHOW SC SHAO J WANG H.Sample size calculations in clinical research[M].New York:Marcel Dekker,2008.
9
FORD WP WESTGATE PM.A comparison of bias-corrected empirical covariance estimators with generalized estimating equations in small-sample longitudinal study settings[J].Stat Med201837(28):4318-4329.
10
PASHKUNOVA D DARICI E SENFT B,et al.Lesion size and location in deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis:Correlation with gastrointestinal dysfunction and pain[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2024103(9):1764-1770.
11
RAIMONDO D COCCHI L RAFFONE A,et al.Pelvic floor dysfunction at transperineal ultrasound and chronic constipation in women with endometriosis[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet2022159(2):505-512.
12
VERCELLINI P SERGENTI G BUGGIO L,et al.Advances in the medical management of bowel endometriosis[J].Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol202171:78-99.
13
DARICI E DENKMAYR D PASHKUNOVA D,et al.Long-term surgical outcomes of nerve-sparing discoid and segmental resection for deep endometriosis[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2022101(9):972-977.

田琦 数据采集,统计分析,论文撰写。陈云,李心翔,陆维祺,华克勤 数据采集,手术实施。叶江枫 统计指导。易晓芳 试验设计和指导,论文修订。

Funding

Building Project of Shanghai Clinical Medical Research Center for Gynecological Diseases(22MC1940200)

Comments

PDF(1158 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/