
Geochemical exploration of blind sulfide-rich ore deposits: Sulphur gas geochemical detection
Qiang WANG, Zhizhong CHENG, Tingjie YAN, Chenggui LIN, Zezhong DU, Huixiang YUAN, Xiaolei LI
Geochemical exploration of blind sulfide-rich ore deposits: Sulphur gas geochemical detection
Sulfur gas geochemical detection has long been applied in mineral exploration. However, this method has not been widely used due to the high activity and reactivity of sulfur gases, low reproducibility of test results, and high cost. Today, as mineral exploration shifts from near-surface, easy-to-discover ore deposits to deep concealed ones, and with the successful development of portable, economical, efficient, real-time gas detection systems, a new opportunity arises to improve and promote this method. This paper reviews research progress, challenges, and future development directions regarding to concealed sulfide-rich deposits. Equilibrium thermodynamic models, simulation experiments on weathering and oxidation of sulfide minerals, and field studies suggest that gas geochemical anomalies of concealed sulfide-rich ore deposits are influenced by their mineral compositions, cover characteristics, geochemical landscapes, and physicochemical characteristics of sulfur gases. In regolith-covered terrains, portable multi-component gas analyzers can be used to obtain on-site, real-time measurements of soil gases including sulfur gases; more importantly, sulfur gas anomalies in soils tend to appear directly above the blind deposits if the blind deposits are covered by regolith directly. In bedrock outcrops, sulfur gases can be measured by rock thermal desorption; and the spatial relationship between the blind deposits and sulfur gas anomalies is primarily influenced by the development of permeable channels such as faults and fractures. Case studies indicate the sulfur gas geochemical detection is effective for mineral exploration in semi-arid and arid terrains and has great potential for mineral exploration in semi-humid and humid terrains. Future research directions should focus on three aspects: the formation and evolutionary process of sulfur gases in surface environment to ascertain the dominant controlling factors; the effectiveness of geochemical detection of sulphur-containing gases under different geochemical landscapes, especially in semi-humid and humid terrains; and the miniaturization and intelligent upgrading of portable soil gas detection equipment.
geochemical exploration / covered terrain / blind deposits / soil gas / sulfur gases
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
谢学锦, 王学求. 深穿透勘查地球化学[J]. 物探与化探, 1998, 22(3): 166-169.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
崔熙琳, 汪明启, 唐金荣. 金属矿气体地球化学测量技术新进展[J]. 物探与化探, 2009, 33(2): 135-139.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
张洁, 程志中, 伦知颍, 等. 土壤中CO2、SO2和H2S气体测量: 一种适用于覆盖区找矿的化探方法[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(4): 12-17.
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
李生郁, 徐丰孚. 轻烃及硫化物气体测量找寻多金属隐伏矿方法试验[J]. 物探与化探, 1997, 21(2): 128-138, 127.
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
林成贵, 程志中, 姚晓峰, 等. 基于PMGRA气体地球化学测量在辽东浅覆盖区找矿的可行性[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(11): 4038-4053.
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
王强, 王学求, 刘汉粮, 等. 半干旱—干旱地区以钙积层为采样介质的隐伏金矿地球化学勘查[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(3): 1104-1120.
|
[68] |
龚庆杰, 夏学齐, 刘宁强. 2011—2020中国应用地球化学研究进展与展望[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2020, 39(5): 927-944.
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
张民堂. 二氧化硫气体测量找矿法[J]. 化工地质, 1983, 5(1): 72-73.
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
[74] |
|
[75] |
|
[76] |
|
[77] |
|
[78] |
|
[79] |
万卫, 陈振亚, 程志中, 等. CO2气体测量方法在低山丘陵区隐伏矿勘查的试验研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(1): 70-76.
|
[80] |
|
[81] |
刘汉彬, 韩娟, 石晓, 等. 气体地球化学测量方法在皂火壕砂岩型铀矿勘查中的应用试验研究[J]. 铀矿地质, 2023, 39(2): 287-301.
|
[82] |
郭志娟, 孔牧, 张华, 等. 适合地球化学勘查的景观划分研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(1): 12-15.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |