Toxicity thresholds (ECx) for Cr in soils and prediction models

Xiaoyi SUN, Meng WANG, Luyao QIN, Lei YU, Jing WANG, Shibao CHEN

PDF(2958 KB)
PDF(2958 KB)
Earth Science Frontiers ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 121-129. DOI: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.11.55

Toxicity thresholds (ECx) for Cr in soils and prediction models

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The lack of toxicology data is the main factor hindering the ecological risk assessment of Cr contamination in soils and the revision of soil environmental quality standards in China. In this study, we conduct toxicology tests on seven soil types (with different soil properties) in China, using earthworm biomass, cabbage biomass, and microbial matrix induced respiration (SIR) as measurement endpoints. We determined the effective concentration (ECx) values under different soil types based on the Log-logistic dose-effect relationship and low-dose stimulus effect function model. On this basis we developed predictive models for estimating toxicity thresholds of Cr under different soil properties. Chromium toxicity in earthworms, Chinese cabbage, and soil microorganisms under different soil types showed significant inhibitory effect with increased soil Cr concentrations, and the dose-response (D-R) relationship was clearly sigmoid in shape. Under different soil types, the EC10 values for soil microorganisms (SIR), earthworms, and Chinese cabbage ranged between 22.1-53.7, 65.0-137.2, and 82.1-220.2 mg/kg, respectively, and the EC50 values between 50.3-103.7, 103.9-369.0, and 159.9-441.9 mg/kg, respectively. The Cr toxicity thresholds for the tested species, from high to low, followed the order of Chinese cabbage>earthworms>soil microorganisms, with soil microorganisms being the most sensitive to Cr toxicity. Under low Cr concentrations (<112 mg/kg), the tested species showed significant hormesis effects, among which earthworms had a maximum hormesis between 102%-108% under different soil types, and Chinese cabbage between 105%-112%, while soil microorganisms showed relatively small effect at 104%. Chromium toxicity thresholds under different soil types can be well predicted based on soil pH and clay/CEC contents. The research results provide a scientific basis for the ecological risk assessment of Cr in soils and for the formulation and revision of environmental quality standards for Cr in soils.

Key words

chromium / dose-response / hormesis / toxicity threshold

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xiaoyi SUN , Meng WANG , Luyao QIN , et al . Toxicity thresholds (ECx) for Cr in soils and prediction models. Earth Science Frontiers. 2024, 31(2): 121-129 https://doi.org/10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.11.55

References

[1]
SINGH D, SHARMA N, SINGH C K, et al. Chromium (VI)-induced alterations in physio-chemical parameters, yield, and yield characteristics in two cultivars of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2021, 12: 735129.
[2]
LARSEN K K, WIELANDT D, SCHILLER M, et al. Chromatographic speciation of Cr(III)-species, inter-species equilibrium isotope fractionation and improved chemical purification strategies for high-precision isotope analysis[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2016, 1443: 162-174.
[3]
DE FLORA S, BAGNASCO M, SERRA D, et al. Genotoxicity of chromium compounds. A review[J]. Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, 1990, 238(2): 99-172.
[4]
ASHRAF A, BIBI I, NIAZI N K, et al. Chromium(VI) sorption efficiency of acid-activated banana peel over organo-montmorillonite in aqueous solutions[J]. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2017, 19(7): 605-613.
[5]
SAHA R, NANDI R, SAHA B. Sources and toxicity of hexavalent chromium[J]. Journal of Coordination Chemistry, 2011, 64(10): 1782-1806.
[6]
SPEIR T W, KETTLES H A, PARSHOTAM A, et al. A simple kinetic approach to derive the ecological dose value, ED50, for the assessment of Cr(VI) toxicity to soil biological properties[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1995, 27(6): 801-810.
[7]
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000.
[8]
ZHANG X, ZHANG X, LI L, et al. The toxicity of hexavalent chromium to soil microbial processes concerning soil properties and aging time[J]. Environmental Research, 2022, 204: 111941.
[9]
HAANSTRA L, DOELMAN P, VOSHAAR J H O. The use of sigmoidal dose response curves in soil ecotoxicological research[J]. Plant and Soil, 1985, 84(2): 293-297.
[10]
李泽姣, 崔岩山, 蔡晓琳, 等. 土壤铬污染对赤子爱胜蚓抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2020, 37(1): 20-26.
[11]
王晓南, 刘征涛, 王婉华, 等. 重金属铬(Ⅵ)的生态毒性及其土壤环境基准[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(8): 3155-3161.
[12]
EZE M O, GEORGE S C, HOSE G C. Dose-response analysis of diesel fuel phytotoxicity on selected plant species[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 263: 128382.
[13]
GILLER K E, WITTER E, MCGRATH S P. Heavy metals and soil microbes[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41(10): 2031-2037.
[14]
OORTS K, BRONCKAERS H, SMOLDERS E. Discrepancy of the microbial response to elevated copper between freshly spiked and long-term contaminated soils[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2006, 25(3): 845-853.
[15]
CHEN S, MENG W, LI S, et al. Overview on current criteria for heavy metals and its hint for the revision of soil environmental quality standards in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(4): 765-774.
[16]
AMIN H, ARAIN B A, AMIN F, et al. Phytotoxicity of chromium on germination, growth and biochemical attributes of Hibiscus esculentus L[J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2013, 4(12): 2431-2439.
[17]
王爱云, 黄姗姗, 钟国锋, 等. 铬胁迫对3种草本植物生长及铬积累的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(6): 2028-2037.
[18]
KUPERMAN R G, SICILIANO S D, RÖMBKE J, et al. Deriving site-specific soil clean-up values for metals and metalloids: rationale for including protection of soil microbial processes[J]. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2014, 10(3): 388-400.
[19]
BERRY R III, LÓPEZ-MARTÍNEZ G. A dose of experimental hormesis: when mild stress protects and improves animal performance[J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology, 2020, 242: 110658.
[20]
BELZ R G, DUKE S O. Modelling biphasic hormetic dose responses to predict sub-NOAEL effects using plant biology as an example[J]. Current Opinion in Toxicology, 2022, 29: 36-42.
[21]
PATNAIK A R, ACHARY V M M, PANDA B B. Chromium (VI)-induced hormesis and genotoxicity are mediated through oxidative stress in root cells of Allium cepa L[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2013, 71: 157-170.
[22]
MORKUNAS I, WOŹNIAK A, MAI V C, et al. The role of heavy metals in plant response to biotic stress[J]. Molecules, 2018, 23(9): 2320.
[23]
UDDIN I, BANO A, MASOOD S. Chromium toxicity tolerance of Solanum nigrum L. and Parthenium hysterophorus L. plants with reference to ion pattern, antioxidation activity and root exudation[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2015, 113: 271-278.
[24]
TALEBI M, TABATABAEI B E S, AKBARZADEH H. Hyperaccumulation of Cu, Zn, Ni, and Cd in Azolla species inducing expression of methallothionein and phytochelatin synthase genes[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 230: 488-497.
[25]
CALABRESE E J, AGATHOKLEOUS E, KOZUMBO W J, et al. Estimating the range of the maximum hormetic stimulatory response[J]. Environmental Research, 2019, 170: 337-343.
[26]
ZHANG X X, LIN Z F. Hormesis-induced gap between the guidelines and reality in ecological risk assessment[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 243: 125348.
[27]
JARDINE P M, STEWART M A, BARNETT M O, et al. Influence of soil geochemical and physical properties on chromium(VI) sorption and bioaccessibility[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 47(19): 11241-11248.
[28]
LIN X L, SUN Z J, ZHAO L, et al. Toxicity of exogenous hexavalent chromium to soil-dwelling springtail Folsomia candida in relation to soil properties and aging time[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 224: 734-742.
[29]
LI B R, LIAO P, XIE L, et al. Reduced NOM triggered rapid Cr(VI) reduction and formation of NOM-Cr(III) colloids in anoxic environments[J]. Water Research, 2020, 181: 115923.
[30]
马虹, 王学东, 李金瓶, 等. 土壤理化性质对外源六价铬植物毒性的影响[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(4)224-232.
[31]
ALYAZOURI A, JEWSBURY R, TAYIM H, et al. Uptake of chromium by Portulaca oleracea from soil: effects of organic content, pH, and sulphate concentration[J]. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2020, 2020: 1-10.
[32]
LOYAUX-LAWNICZAK S, LECOMTE P, EHRHARDT J J. Behavior of hexavalent chromium in a polluted groundwater: redox processes and immobilization in soils[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2001, 35(7): 1350-1357.

Footnotes

Comments

PDF(2958 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/